womanofdulwich Posted March 12, 2012 Share Posted March 12, 2012 Is it just me - or are more and more people posting with atrocious spellings? is it mistyping/ laziness/ poor English? Discuss. Link to comment https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/22448-spellings/ Share on other sites More sharing options...
maxxi Posted March 12, 2012 Share Posted March 12, 2012 Discuss? http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/9/97/Discus_Thrower_Copenhagen.jpg/220px-Discus_Thrower_Copenhagen.jpg Link to comment https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/22448-spellings/#findComment-530050 Share on other sites More sharing options...
womanofdulwich Posted March 12, 2012 Author Share Posted March 12, 2012 Don't get me going Maxxi.Poor spellings hurt! Link to comment https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/22448-spellings/#findComment-530053 Share on other sites More sharing options...
Alan Medic Posted March 12, 2012 Share Posted March 12, 2012 Why are there no spaces in your user name WOD? Link to comment https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/22448-spellings/#findComment-530057 Share on other sites More sharing options...
Voyageur Posted March 12, 2012 Share Posted March 12, 2012 Isn't it atrocious spelling? Link to comment https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/22448-spellings/#findComment-530059 Share on other sites More sharing options...
womanofdulwich Posted March 12, 2012 Author Share Posted March 12, 2012 Not in this case Voyageur-spellings are countable nouns- but you are correct it could be the verb "spelling". Link to comment https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/22448-spellings/#findComment-530063 Share on other sites More sharing options...
PeckhamRose Posted March 12, 2012 Share Posted March 12, 2012 I still can't spell vodaffffff -- ffffffffffff... Nope. Can't do it, it's wrong! Link to comment https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/22448-spellings/#findComment-530089 Share on other sites More sharing options...
El Pibe Posted March 12, 2012 Share Posted March 12, 2012 Tori Spelling, she was really poor! Link to comment https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/22448-spellings/#findComment-530102 Share on other sites More sharing options...
maxxi Posted March 12, 2012 Share Posted March 12, 2012 Apologies WOD but I was under the spell of a spelling-fit for a spell there even though I knew it could spell disaster.As Shakespeare/Shakespere/Shakespear/Shakspeare/Shackspeare/Shakspere/Shackespeare/Shackspere/Shackespere/Shaxspere/ Shexpere...etc. himself and other Elizabethans took a fairly relaxed approach to spelling, and sometimes relied on phonetic spelling to get their meaning across, I, as a modern Elizabethan, take a similarly relaxed view.But the next person to say "Would of..." or "Could of..." will get shrift of the shortest kind......and thus risk remaining unshriven. Link to comment https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/22448-spellings/#findComment-530105 Share on other sites More sharing options...
ibilly99 Posted March 12, 2012 Share Posted March 12, 2012 That's dyslexics fIcked then... Link to comment https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/22448-spellings/#findComment-530142 Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chippy Minton Posted March 13, 2012 Share Posted March 13, 2012 Shakespeare couldn't careless about spelling....just ask Topshophttp://i.dailymail.co.uk/i/pix/2012/03/05/article-2110534-120A039E000005DC-488_468x673.jpg Link to comment https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/22448-spellings/#findComment-530259 Share on other sites More sharing options...
Atticus Posted March 13, 2012 Share Posted March 13, 2012 I'm with voyageur here, 'spelling' should have been used. Link to comment https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/22448-spellings/#findComment-530262 Share on other sites More sharing options...
Burbage Posted March 13, 2012 Share Posted March 13, 2012 womanofdulwich Wrote:-------------------------------------------------------> Not in this case Voyageur-spellings are countable> nouns- but you are correct it could be the verb> "spelling".Atticus and Voyageur are delightfully correct."Spelling" is the gerund of a verb. You can, if you wish, use it as a verbal noun, such as in "her spelling is poor"; that is what gerunds are for. But to claim a gerund as a countable noun, and then to pluralize it, is a manifest error that would once have warranted corporal punishment.Would a jogger take "runnings" in the park, or a diner take their "eatings" in a restaurant? The line between grammar and insanity is finer than many think and, with respect, I suggest that the orthographical mishaps of others should be the least of WoD's worries. Link to comment https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/22448-spellings/#findComment-530438 Share on other sites More sharing options...
Voyageur Posted March 13, 2012 Share Posted March 13, 2012 Thank gawd [sic] for that! Thought I had lost my touch :( Link to comment https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/22448-spellings/#findComment-530443 Share on other sites More sharing options...
Saffron Posted March 13, 2012 Share Posted March 13, 2012 Burbage Wrote:-------------------------------------------------------> womanofdulwich Wrote:> --------------------------------------------------> -----> > Not in this case Voyageur-spellings are> countable> > nouns- but you are correct it could be the verb> > "spelling".> > Atticus and Voyageur are delightfully correct.> > "Spelling" is the gerund of a verb. You can, if> you wish, use it as a verbal noun, such as in "her> spelling is poor"; that is what gerunds are for. Grammar and insanity, indeed! Ending a sentence with a preposition, whatever next I ask you?!;-) Link to comment https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/22448-spellings/#findComment-530445 Share on other sites More sharing options...
Atticus Posted March 14, 2012 Share Posted March 14, 2012 Truss would be all over this, God, she annoys me! Link to comment https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/22448-spellings/#findComment-530666 Share on other sites More sharing options...
ianr Posted March 14, 2012 Share Posted March 14, 2012 > "Spelling" is the gerund of a verb. You can, if you wish, use it as a verbal noun, such as in> "her spelling is poor"; that is what gerunds are for. But to claim a gerund as a countable noun,> and then to pluralize it, is a manifest error that would once have warranted corporal punishment. Cf entry 2b below.From the OED Second edition, 1989; online version March 2012:spelling, n.2 1. a. The action, practice, or art of naming the letters of words, of reading letter by letter, or of expressing words by letters.[... eg]1809?10 S. T. Coleridge Friend (1837) III. 343 There is one branch of learning without which learning itself cannot be railed at with common decency, namely, spelling.1871 J. Earle Philol. Eng. Tongue ii. 121 That which we call a settled orthography is a habit of spelling which admits only of rare modification.... 2.a. Manner of expressing or writing words with letters; orthography. Also fig.[... eg] 1697 C. Leslie Snake in Grass (ed. 2) 112 By some unusual Spelling of some words.1894 W. M. Lindsay Lat. Lang. i. ?12 However natural it may appear for the Romans to have adopted Greek spelling....b. A particular instance of this; a special collocation of letters representing a word.[...eg]1738 Swift Compl. Coll. Genteel Conversat. p. l, Of these Spellings the Publick will meet with many Examples.1758 J. Armstrong Sketches 18 An Author seems reduced to great Extremities, who flies to new Spellings to distinguish himself.1811 Scott Let. Sept. (1932) II. 543 All the licenses of using obsolete words and uncommon spellings.1894 W. M. Lindsay Lat. Lang. i. ?8 The dates at which these spellings are first found on inscriptions. Link to comment https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/22448-spellings/#findComment-530724 Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now