Jump to content

Recommended Posts

My mate's Polish cleaner has resigned because she is better off on income support (single mum, dad pushed off). How does that work then? Does UK PLC pay for that or does it get divvied up by Europe?


I can't imagine there are many unemployed British cleaners in Warsaw drawing income support. Does Poland even have it?

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/22677-polish-cleaners/
Share on other sites

I imagine that'd be the case because no unemployed british cleaners have the wherewithal and vim to learn another language and get off their arses and go tto the bits of the EU where there is work to be had.


She clearly did all this and now, as a single mum, is entitled to a bit of support. I'd rather she was spending time bringing up her children right rather than working all the hours god sends to pay for the childcare and desperately make ends meet.


I'm sure she'd love to go back home and have the support of her family, but maybe dad is English and is leaning on her to stay in the country, difficult to judge without any knowledge of the situation.

As a Polish national she would need to have worked full time for 12 months and be actively looking for work to claim income support.


If she has resigned in order to claim income support then legally she's a benefit fraudster.


However, I think this overlooks the central tenet of the OP, which is insinuating that foreginers are coming to UK to be parasites on our welfare state and steal money from British people.


People should be reassured to discover that around 20% of Brits claim income support fo some kind - whereas only 6% of foreigners do.


So the Brits are more likely to be benefit parasites than Polish housemaids.

Indeed, that's the beauty of the EU. If you want to live somewhere warmer with a better quality of life you can do so. Obviously you need to learn a foreign language and stuff and actually do it in the first place though.

Good luck enjoying life in St Tropez on income support though ;)

A friend of mine who lives in Spain reckons that if you have worked there for a year and then lose your job, the amount you then get for unemployment benefit is calculated based on the salary that you were on.


I can't remember the exact figure he told me, but is was something really high - 75% may be??


No idea if this is true or not BTW!

That was more or less the case in the Netherlands when I lived there.


It was also very difficult to make someone redundant as redundancy applications have to go past the local authority who are also the same people who have to pay the generous benefits.


Forced redundancies are thus practically unheard of, so packages tend to be ludicrously generous to make them voluntary.


ABN went through two tranches of reducing headcount whilst I was in Amsterdam (sadly I was deemed to be part of a critical function despite my pleading for said generous package), conservatively costing a billion euros each. They needed to do it twice because after the first one they couldn't function and needed to hire lots of people....who cost too much, and they decided the best way to reduce costs was more sweeping redundancies....


Both times I tried to communicate the shortsighted stupidity of the strategy up the chain, but the likes of Huguenot the board weren't interested in the opinions of negative nancy minkies like myself and think that pointing out risks is just being a party pooper, because it'll all work out in the end.


ooops!!

Ha ha - I'm sure people like me aren't so stupid as to fail to realise the apparent foolishness of this exercise.


So that makes it much more likely that they knew something you didn't. That's not as satisfying of a vague feeling of superiority, so people choose to ignore it ;-)


People like El Pibe Drones often think they know better, only to discover that there's usually more to it than meets the eye, and that the job is a bit more difficult than they imagined.


*giggles*


Hating the boss and thinking the management are stupid is a pretty tired and usually inappropriate cliche.

Except of course they didn't have some special knowledge, they were either too optimistic, misguided or stupid. I was right.


Admittedly they slightly learnt from their mistakes. At the third attempt they didn't make people redundant, they outsourced them all to EDF. A better strategy but one that hadn't invloived reading private eye.

EDF were the worst employer of all time and all the capable people left for Barclays and RBS, leaving them with the detritus as the experienced developers and all the good ones replaced by the EDF detritus who weren't even good enough to make it to Peterborough County Council.

ABN were tied in to the contract for 5 years and unable to take on permanent staff independently. They hired in expensive contractors to plug the gap, then gave EDF a huge pay off to change the contract and left them looking after the hardware whilst they had to spend a fortune building up their expensive IT skillsets again.


Thinking the management know what they're doing because they're management is just plain foolish if you ask me.


You only have to look at what happened to ABN to see this, it went virtually bankrupt and dragged down RBS when they didn't do due diligence. THey probably assumed the management knew what they were doing too.


Oops again.


Oh, and I said this one would fail too. It hurts to be able to see the wood for the trees sometimes, even when you're a dull drone, devoid of the superhuman powers granted to management. ;)

nashoi Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> 12 months working in a bar in Calais and then

> signing on, that really is living the dream.

> Steveo have you ever considered a career in

> motivational speaking? I think the american talk

> show circuit beckons.


Do you think? I couldn't sign on over there though could I?


Semi seriously though, I wonder if there are any stats for international benefits claimants. I mean, if you have to scratch on, why not do it on the Riviera?

El Pibe Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Indeed, that's the beauty of the EU. If you want

> to live somewhere warmer with a better quality of

> life you can do so. Obviously you need to learn a

> foreign language and stuff and actually do it in

> the first place though.

> Good luck enjoying life in St Tropez on income

> support though ;)

Very interesting about learning the language- do people actually do that? Because a friend of ours from the EU is making a lucrative living translating all over the place in London!

Huguenot Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> As a Polish national she would need to have worked

> full time for 12 months and be actively looking

> for work to claim income support.

>

> If she has resigned in order to claim income

> support then legally she's a benefit fraudster.

>


I don't think that's strictly true. If you resign, you can still legally claim a reduced form of job seekers allowance after an enforeced time delay. This is not considered fraudulent. (Whether or not it's a good use of funds is entirely another kettle of fish.) Also, resigning a job does not necessarily effect one's eligibity for other forms of benefit payments, as I understand it. Admittedly I haven't checked the webpages today, so this all might have changed. It seems to change at the drop of a hat these days.

Surely you can't claim JSA if you've resigned without good reason? I am not speaking from experience, but it would be scandalous if it was paid out to somebody who quit their job because they thought they'd be better off on benefits.


And if somebody really would be better by not working, there's something seriously wrong with the welfare system.

Steveo, did your mate offer his cleaner more money, or did he look for another cheap Polish cleaner? If there's a market for cheap labour, then people will keep coming. (I'm not meaning to take a stab at your mate personally. I'm just referring to the scenario in general.)


I don't think the benefits system is perfect here, and I do think some individuals use it with questionable intent. Still I'd rather have an imperfect system than no system. I'd also be more inclined to debate the merits/faults of the system as a whole than to besmirch individuals for their choices, unless it is a case of fraud, which should obviously not be condoned. I would have thought it's quite tough to be a single parent in any event, even more so away from your native country.


On the up side, I do hear that Warsaw is lovely. ...lovley enough to relocate and work as a cleaner? Well it sounds tough any way you slice it. Hmmm.

  • 4 weeks later...

We had a Polish girl in to do a one off clean over the weekend. It was ?13 an hour, but not sure what cut of that she would have kept, and how much the company (the company seemed to be another Polish lady).


Anyway, she was chatting to my wife, and said that having cleaned in the UK for 2 years, she'd sent enough money home to buy a lovely new house with modern everything. She said another year or 2, and she'd have enough dosh to go to uni, and start a good career.


I thought bloody good on her, she worked like a trojan, and deserves the rewards that she is making for herself. I can't imagine she'd be better off on benefits, but then, she has a plan. Perhaps if she was planning to stay here long term, and had kids, things might be different, I don't know.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Honestly, the squirrels are not a problem now.  They only eat what has dropped.  The feeders I have are squirrel proof anyway from pre-cage times.  I have never seen rats in the garden, and even when I didn't have the cage.  I most certainly would have noticed them.  I do have a little family of mice which I have zero problem about.  If they stay outside, that's fine with me.  Plus, local cats keep that population down.  There are rats everywhere in London, there is plenty of food rubbish out in the street to keep them happy.  So, I guess you could fit extra bars to the cage if you wanted to, but then you run the risk of the birds not getting in.  They like to be able to fly in and out easily, which they do.   
    • Ahh, the old "it's only three days" chestnut.  I do hope you realise the big metal walls, stages, tents, toilets, lighting, sound equipment, refreshments, concessions etc don't just magically appear & disappear overnight? You know it all has to be transported in & erected, constructed? And that when stuff is constructed, like on a construction site, it's quite noisy & distracting? Banging, crashing, shouting, heavy plant moving around - beep beep beep reversing signals, engines revving - pneumatic tools? For 8 to 10 hours a day, every day? And that it tends to go on for two or three weeks before an event, and a week after when they take it all down again? I'm sure my boys' GCSE prep won't be affected by any of that, especially if we close the windows (before someone suggests that as a resolution). I'm sure it won't affect anyone at the Harris schools either, actually taking their exams with that background noise.
    • Thanks for the good discussion, this should be re-titled as a general thread about feeding the birds. @Penguin not really sure why you posted, most are aware that virtually all land in this country is managed, and has been for 100s of years, but there are many organisations, local and national government, that manage large areas of land that create appropriate habitats for British nature, including rewilding and reintroductions.  We can all do our bit even if this is not cutting your lawn, and certainly by not concreting over it.  (or plastic grass, urgh).   I have simply been stating that garden birds are semi domesticated, as perhaps the deer herds in Richmond Park, New Forest ponies, and even some foxes where we feed them.  Whoever it was who tried to get a cheap jibe in about Southwark and the Gala festival.  Why?  There is a whole thread on Gala for you to moan on.  Lots going on in Southwark https://www.southwark.gov.uk/culture-and-sport/parks-and-open-spaces/ecology-and-wildlife I've talked about green sqwaky things before, if it was legal I'd happily use an air riffle, and I don't eat meat.  And grey squirrels too where I am encourage to dispatch them. Once a small group of starlings also got into the garden I constructed my own cage using starling proof netting, it worked for a year although I had to make a gap for the great spotted woodpecker to get in.  The squirrels got at it in the summer but sqwaky things still haven't come back, starlings recently returned.  I have a large batch of rubbish suet pellets so will let them eat them before reordering and replacing the netting. Didn't find an appropriately sized cage, the gaps in the mesh have to be large enough for finches etc, and the commercial ones were £££ The issue with bird feeders isn't just dirty ones, and I try to keep mine clean, but that sick birds congregate in close proximity with healthy birds.  The cataclysmic obliteration of the greenfinch population was mainly due to dirty feeders and birds feeding close to each other.  
    • Another recommendation for Niko - fitted me in the next day, simple fix rather than trying to upsell and a nice guy as well. Will use again
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...