Jump to content

Recommended Posts



You should realise that it is a breach of someone's human rights to ask them to interrupt a mobile phone call in order that you can have a conversation with them. The person deprived of their phone call can claim damages under the Human Rights Act.


What's all this nonsense about the LL PO being busy being used by all the middle classes? Whenever I go there, there are plenty of people who don't appear to fit into the "middle class" category.

giggirl Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I think it should be a given that customers who

> need to fill out forms should stand aside to do

> it. I use the PO a lot and I arrive with my

> envelopes ready to be scanned. I literally only

> take seconds at the counter. If you need to fill

> out a form, borrow a pen, finish selotaping your

> package, or anything else that does not require

> staff input, then stand aside and let someone else


Good girl giggirl erm, anyway - absolutely spot on - be prepared, bring sellotape and a pen. been using it since way back when, and always exchage pleasentries. They are human beings behind the counter as well... and as for the phone thing - the height of rudeness.

> be served. It's soul destroying to watch staff

> staring into space whilst waiting for customers to

> get ready to be served.

>

> Don't get me started on people who are on their

> phones at the counter; that's rude to the staff

> serving them and to the people waiting.

>

> The staff at Lordship Lane are good people doing

> their best. It's not their place to say "oh it's

> busy today I won't take a break". That's the thin

> end of the wedge. They have to eat and they have

> errands to run, just like everyone else.

Designerjooles Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Attention Razors: I was sending a box of

> chocolates and a card to my father in New Zealand

> for his birthday. Yeah - I'm so middle-class for

> doing that! The horror!

> Grow up and try to get that chip off your

> shoulder. Life is better when your happy.

. . . . . . . .

Sending a box of chocolates half way around the world-thats the type of thing that probably held up the original poster in queue-try reading and undestanding the OP b4 popping. Did the chocs melt i wonder. .

Loz Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Razors Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > What does everyone expect- LL PO is very busy

> with the middle classes sending all kinds of tat

> over

> > the world to their middle class pals, and it is

> they who clog up the PO.

>

> I wish you would PO...

. . . . . . . . . . .

Well if yot are happy to queue then don't complain about the staff,and put the OP right.

What GigGirl said.

If the middle classes are keeping the postal service going (and clogging up LL post office as a side effect) then hats off to them. I gave up on the Royal Mail years ago. All the chocs I send to New Zealand relatives originate from New Zealand chocolate shops. That's the beauty of the internet.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Depends on what the Barista says doesnt it? There was no physical confrontation with the driver, OP thinks she is being targetted when she isnt. These guys work min wage under strict schedules so give them a break unless they damage your stuff
    • CPR Dave, attendance records are available on Southwark's website. Maggie Browning has attended 100% of meetings. Jon Hartley has attended 65%.
    • I do hope NOT, wouldn't trust Farage as far as I could throw him, Starmer & co.  He's backed by GB News which focus's predominantly on immigration while the BBC focus predominantly on the Israel - Gazza conflict.   
    • Everyone gets the point that Corbynites try to make with the "total number of votes cast" statistic, it's just a specious one.  In 2017, Corbyn's Labour got fewer votes than May's Tories (both the percentage of votes and aggregate number of votes). In 2019, Corbyn's Labour fewer votes than Johnson's Tories (both the percentage of votes and aggregate number of votes); and he managed to drop 2.7 million votes or 6.9% of vote share between the two elections. I repeat, he got trounced by Boris F***ing Johnson and the Tories after the Brexit omnishambles. It is not true that a "fairer" electoral system would have seen Labour beat the Tories: Labour simply got fewer votes than the Tories. Corbyn lost twice. There is no metric by which he won the general election. His failure to win was a disaster for the UK, and let Johnson and Truss and Sunak into office. Corbynites have to let go of this delusion that Corbyn but really won somehow if you squint in a certain way. It is completely irrelevant that Labour under Corbyn got more votes than Labour under Starmer. It is like saying Hull City was more successful in its 2014 FA Cup Final than Chelsea was in its 2018 FA Cup Final, because Hull scored 2 goals when Chelsea only scored 1. But guess what - Chelsea won its game and Hull City lost. Corbyn's fans turned out to vote for him - but an even larger group of people who found him repellant were motivated enough to show up and vote Tory.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...