Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Good lord. I leave you alone for 5 minutes and look what happens.


First, I was referring to Legaleagleish being single sexy and generous, not LM, though she no doubt has two of those three attributes. For the record, I don't want to run off with either of them. Yet.


Secondly, my sulk was with Karter for suggesting she (LE) was nicer than me (the fact that she is is just no excuse).


Thirdly, MP, LM has shown that you lie. You do not just offer curry. Though your disclaimer is appreciated, it appears to have failed. But perhaps now the principle of caveat emptor should apply and I will just have to turn up to another curry night and suck it and see, so to speak. Though I will be right mardy if Brum doesn't turn up with a good yarn or two.


And finally, EDL, of course I'm jealous. The local single fireman just dished the dirt on his 70's gigolo days and I didn't get in on the gossip. I'm a married old hag with sole care of two small kids. No longer do I become tired; I am tired. Vicarious living is a BIG DEAL!


Here endeth the lesson. Don't you lot have homes to go to?

OK


"Curry Club, involving conversation, drink, food and ripping yarns from the Saucy Sailor"


PLEASE NOTE THAT THE ORGANISORS CANNOT GUARANTEE THE QUALITY OF ANY OF THE ABOVE ELEMENTS AND ARE NOT BE RESPONSIBLE FOR ANY SHENANIGINS THAT MAY OR MAY NOT OCCUR BEFORE, DURING OR AFTER

Michael Palaeologus Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> OK

>

> "Curry Club, involving conversation, drink, food

> and ripping yarns from the Saucy Sailor"

>

> PLEASE NOTE THAT THE ORGANISORS CANNOT GUARANTEE

> THE QUALITY OF ANY OF THE ABOVE ELEMENTS AND ARE

> NOT BE RESPONSIBLE FOR ANY SHENANIGINS THAT MAY OR

> MAY NOT OCCUR BEFORE, DURING OR AFTER



Better! Case dismissed!


*still sniggering*

MP - b plus. A great improvement. You are now off the hook, and, though you probably now won't invite me, I may well attempt to make the next curry club.


[though for future ref the sign off should be "without prejudice save as to costs". That last bit could get you out of a lot of bother.]


Ahem.


Maybe I need to get out more?

Oh LM you are forgiven for I too was just entering into the comical aspect of this whole debacle! :))


We probably all should get out more, however, when the weather is what it is outside, what better way to spend the evening than with a jolly curry conundrum! :)-D

ED Lurker Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Oh LM you are forgiven for I too was just entering

> into the comical aspect of this whole debacle! :))


It's OK EDL...I'm STILL sniggering...hee hee


> We probably all should get out more, however, when

> the weather is what it is outside, what better way

> to spend the evening than with a jolly curry

> conundrum! :)-D


My sentiments exactly!


*waves regally to EDL*

karter Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> now now legalB, i was suggesting that LE may offer

> her services as a lawyer for free in suing Mike P

> of the curry club and i was not saying she is

> nicer than you. I am sure you are nice though.:)-D



[sniffle]


oh. ok then.

Ladymuck Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> ???? Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > Darn you Lady M

> >

> > *grabs handful and sobs*

>

> Oh LM you are just too lovely. Can I run off with you now?!

>

>

> *quietly tip-toes over and positions large bin

> next to the distraught ????...sneaks off again

> without making a sound*

legalbeagle Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> karter Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > now now legalB, i was suggesting that LE may

> offer

> > her services as a lawyer for free in suing Mike

> P

> > of the curry club and i was not saying she is

> > nicer than you. I am sure you are nice

> though.:)-D

>

>

> sniffle

>

> oh. ok then.


*hands over a bottle of the finest organic prosecco to LB*


:)-D


btw, curry cabin are pretty hot at the mo.

*hands over a bottle of the finest organic prosecco to LB*


[LB peers at present and notes to self that she has a bleedin' shop full of organic prosecco. "Coals to Newcastle" springs to mind. But hey, it's the thought that counts.]


Thanks you Karter. How kind. I feel much better now.

legalbeagle Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------


> > Oh LM you are just too lovely. Can I run off

> with you now?!


*scratches pea brain whilst contemplating whether or not to play "hard to get"*


Well, only if I may have a swig of that nice organic prosecco which karter gave you...not that I'm shallow or easily bought you understand.;-)

Ladymuck Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> legalbeagle Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

>

> > > Oh LM you are just too lovely. Can I run off

> > with you now?!

>

> *scratches pea brain whilst contemplating whether

> or not to play "hard to get"*

>

> Well, only if I may have a swig of that nice

> organic prosecco which karter gave you...not that

> I'm shallow or easily bought you understand.;-)


Oh I quite understand. One should never be seen as a pushover, but at the same time, wouldn't want to price oneself out of the market, so to speak. A tricky balancing act for any girl. I usually open negotiations at two mars bars and a fiver, but organic prosecco is probably a classier bid.


It's a deal!

Ladymuck Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> karter Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > Organic prosecco and some nibbly bits too.

>

>

> nibbly bits?


I have no recollection of discussing nibbly bits either. No no. Most certainly not part of the negotiation.


How very dare you.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Girls In Your City - No Selfie - Anonymous Casual Dating https://SecreLocal.com [url=https://SecreLocal.com] Girls In Your City [/url] - Anonymous Casual Dating - No Selfie New Girls [url=https://secrelocal.com/girl/vanessa-100.html]Vanessa[/url] [url=https://secrelocal.com/girl/vanessa-100.html]Vanessa[/url] [url=https://secrelocal.com/girl/molly-15.html]Molly[/url] [url=https://secrelocal.com/girl/cheryl-blossom-48.html]Cheryl Blossom[/url] [url=https://secrelocal.com/girl/carola-conymegan-116.html]Carola Conymegan[/url] [url=https://secrelocal.com/girl/pupa-41.html]Pupa[/url] [url=https://secrelocal.com/girl/mia-candy-43.html]Mia Candy[/url]
    • This is a remarkable interpretation of history. Wikipedia (with more footnotes and citations than you could shake a shitty stick at sez: The austerity programme was initiated in 2010 by the Conservative and Liberal Democrat coalition government. In his June 2010 budget speech, Osborne identified two goals. The first was that the structural current budget deficit would be eliminated to "achieve [a] cyclically-adjusted current balance by the end of the rolling, five-year forecast period". The second was that national debt as a percentage of GDP would fall. The government intended to achieve both of its goals through substantial reductions in public expenditure.[21] This was to be achieved by a combination of public spending cuts and tax increases amounting to £110 billion.[26] Between 2010 and 2013, the Coalition government said that it had reduced public spending by £14.3 billion compared with 2009–10.[27] Growth remained low, while unemployment rose. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_Kingdom_government_austerity_programme From memory, last time around they were against the LTNs and competing with the Tories to pick up backlash votes - both failed. They had no counterproposals or ideas about how to manage congestion or pollution. This time around they're simply silent on the matter: https://www.southwark-libdems.org.uk/your-local-lib-dem-team/goosegreen Also, as we have seen from Mr Barber's comments on the new development on the old Jewsons yard, "leading campaigns to protect the character of East Dulwich and Goose Green" is code for "blocking new housing".
    • @Insuflo NO, please no, please don't encourage him to post more often! 😒
    • Revealing of what, exactly? I resurrected this thread, after a year, to highlight the foolishness of the OP’s op. And how posturing would be sagacity is quickly undermined by events, dear boy, events. The thread is about Mandelson. I knew he was a wrong ‘un all along, we all did; the Epstein shit just proves it. In reality, Kinnock, Blair, Brown, Starmer et all knew as well but accepted it, because they found him useful. As did a large proportion of the 2024 intake of Labour MPs who were personally vetted and approved by Mandelson.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...