Jump to content

Balanced papers/websites/magazines?


TheCat

Recommended Posts

I've often commented on this forum about the lack of balance in most political discussion these days, and the rise of tribalism which hampers rational debate.


Anyway, can the forum recommend any publications which don't overtly lean one political way or the other, and either contain balanced contributions, or at least opposing points of view from both sides of the aisle? Reason being I'm sick of reading the holier than thou Graun, the right wing tabloids aren't an option, the Telegraph I don't mind but again suffers from the same disease as the Guardian but with a different viewpoint.


I know nothing about the various current affairs magazines on offer in the UK...spectator, private eye, new statesman....are any of these of any quality /balanced?


Finally I like reading opinion pieces hence while the BBC is balanced for the most part it doesn't really make me think. Possibly the economist, but that can be a tad dull..I work in finance, so don't need to read a bout it on the weekend!


Genuine question, so genuine responses please (wishful thinking perhaps!)


Any suggestions welcome...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The Economist was the first thing that came into my head as I was reading your post, until I got to the bit...

Private Eye is very good if you like political satire. Spec and NS worth a look but I find I only really like certain writers such as Stephen Bush at NS rather than the magazines as a whole. Failing that, Angling Times...


PS. This was an interesting read about trying to cultivate balanced online debate... https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/blogs-trending-48579597

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Private Eye is a satirical magazine, so not sure what it's doing in your list. (although well worth reading)


Try reading both The Spectator and New Statesman for some right/left balance. Personally I find Spectator more fun but does have a handful of horrible columnists and a fair bit of right wing trolling. The NS is OK but a bit more Guardian like 'Worthiness' in its tone and so a bit duller.


Still think you'll get more balance from these than any of the laughably rubbish in their words ' non MSM' websites - for which Spiked (on the right) and The Canary (on the left) are basically, laughably one sided propoganda sites.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

"Private Eye is a satirical magazine"


Partly, yes, but have you not read the investigative articles, the stuff at "The Back" and "The City" sections? I would say at least half is proper journalism as opposed to satire. I've been a subscriber for several years now.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Townleygreen Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> "Private Eye is a satirical magazine"

>

> Partly, yes, but have you not read the

> investigative articles, the stuff at "The Back"

> and "The City" sections? I would say at least half

> is proper journalism as opposed to satire. I've

> been a subscriber fro several years now.


'Rotten Boroughs' is pretty accurate too

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • A bit like this: https://www.theguardian.com/politics/2024/apr/27/tory-staff-running-network-of-anti-ulez-facebook-groups-riddled-with-racism-and-abuse
    • Because the council responsible for it is far-left....   And you haven't answered whether it is worth diverting emergency vehicles because a few cars drive through the LTN and why some lobby groups have been so desperate to close it to emergency vehicles.    Emergency services hate non-permeable junctions as they lengthen response times....f you remember it's why the council had to redesign the DV junction because emergency services kept telling them they needed to be able to drive through it...but the council resisted and resisted until they finally relented because the emergency services said their LTN had increased response times....sorry if the truth gets in the way of a good story but those are facts. The council was putting lives at risk because they refused to open the junction to emergency services. Why? What could have been the motivation for that? So, in fact, it was the emergency services who forced the council (kicking and screaming) to remove the permanent barriers and allow emergency services access. So the council finally opened the junction to emergency services and is now coming back to re-close part of the junction.  Why?  Perhaps you should be asking who is lobbying the council to close the junction or parts of it or why the council is happy to waste so much of our money on it - who are they representing as even their own consultation demonstrated they did not have support from the local community for the measures? The results showed the majority of local residents were against the measure...but they are going ahead with them anyway.   In time, I am sure the truth will come to light and those rewponsbile will be held accountable but you have to admit there is something very unusual going on with that junction - its the very definition of a (very expensive) white elephant.    
    • A Roadblock that a civilised society wouldn’t allow. 
    • Now this is cycling  BBC News - Tweed Run London bike ride evokes spirit of yesteryear https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-london-68900476  
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...