Jump to content

Bin rummaging / stealing on Lordship Lane


Recommended Posts

Sue Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Re the point above about burning/shredding paper,

> you can also put confidential papers (or the part

> of them with useable identifying features on) in a

> bucket (or bath) of water, with or without washing

> up liquid, leave them to soak for a bit, then

> mash them to a pulp. A lot quicker than shredding,

> at least if you only have a smallish personal

> shredder rather than a massive office shredder.

>

> However, don't do what I did and put the resultant

> pulp in a compost bin. It just all stuck together,

> the worms didn't like it, and I had to fish it all

> out again (still all stuck together) after months

> :))

>

> I have no idea whether the pulp would go into the

> blue recycling bin or the green bin, though. I

> will soon find out, as I too am sorting through

> about twenty years' worth of financial stuff :(

>

> Admin: I know this is off topic, but I am

> responding to a post above.


Great idea actually.


Make some artwork out of the pulp and display/sell :)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...
Just in case this is helpful / relevant: I also saw a woman of this description (shopping trolley, fairly well dressed) rummaging through the bins in Nunhead at around 12.30 today (Carden Road I think). Two young men (presumably those who lived in the flat / house she was outside) were taking photos / filming her and asked her to move on. This was in Broad daylight obviously.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

this doesn't make sense.



Countrlass22 Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Macutd. U should call 1p1 inform police state have

> photo to.

> We had it and they came in unmarked car caught

> them trying get items for identity theft.

>

> Said wish more report as you see it that entering

> your gate going into bin is theft.

> That it's gangs women sometimes guys.

> Identify theft mostly

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Chick Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> this doesn't make sense.

>

>

> Countrlass22 Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > Macutd. U should call 1p1 inform police state

> have

> > photo to.

> > We had it and they came in unmarked car caught

> > them trying get items for identity theft.

> >

> > Said wish more report as you see it that

> entering

> > your gate going into bin is theft.

> > That it's gangs women sometimes guys.

> > Identify theft mostly



It makes sense to me.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Countrlass22 Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Macutd. U should call 1p1 inform police state have

> photo to.

> We had it and they came in unmarked car caught

> them trying get items for identity theft.

>

What do you know of the outcome? Found and questioned in the street? Searched? Arrested? Cautioned or charged? Convicted?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Was that an informal warning or an official caution?


I'm particularly interested in the extent to which the police treat these cases seriously if there's clear evidence of removal of papers containing personal information that might be used for id theft. Was there any that you know of in this case?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • A bit like this: https://www.theguardian.com/politics/2024/apr/27/tory-staff-running-network-of-anti-ulez-facebook-groups-riddled-with-racism-and-abuse
    • Because the council responsible for it is far-left....   And you haven't answered whether it is worth diverting emergency vehicles because a few cars drive through the LTN and why some lobby groups have been so desperate to close it to emergency vehicles.    Emergency services hate non-permeable junctions as they lengthen response times....f you remember it's why the council had to redesign the DV junction because emergency services kept telling them they needed to be able to drive through it...but the council resisted and resisted until they finally relented because the emergency services said their LTN had increased response times....sorry if the truth gets in the way of a good story but those are facts. The council was putting lives at risk because they refused to open the junction to emergency services. Why? What could have been the motivation for that? So, in fact, it was the emergency services who forced the council (kicking and screaming) to remove the permanent barriers and allow emergency services access. So the council finally opened the junction to emergency services and is now coming back to re-close part of the junction.  Why?  Perhaps you should be asking who is lobbying the council to close the junction or parts of it or why the council is happy to waste so much of our money on it - who are they representing as even their own consultation demonstrated they did not have support from the local community for the measures? The results showed the majority of local residents were against the measure...but they are going ahead with them anyway.   In time, I am sure the truth will come to light and those rewponsbile will be held accountable but you have to admit there is something very unusual going on with that junction - its the very definition of a (very expensive) white elephant.    
    • A Roadblock that a civilised society wouldn’t allow. 
    • Now this is cycling  BBC News - Tweed Run London bike ride evokes spirit of yesteryear https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-london-68900476  
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...