Jump to content

Recommended Posts

In all likelihood you're right El Pibe, but it's still a bit dodgy.


Not necessarily from an outbreak of paediatricians in our parks standpoint - but if this guys doing surveys with minors, then he should be getting parental consent.


Perhaps he's a local ice cream man and wants to establish which schools he should be targeting come summer with his delicious dairy goodness. And perhaps he has no budget for fancy-dan marketing companies so perhaps he is doing it himself, and perhaps he doesn't realise that the market research code of conduct says he needs parental permission.


Common sense should tell him that he might want to look into it a bit though, no?

A couple of days after 9/11 an American friend of mine said he was despairing of the country he was soon to return to.

He'd just got off the phone to his mum. She'd been recently interviewing people to rent out the downstairs apartment she owned.


There had been a couple of young muslim men wanting to rent it. She didn't really like the cut of their jib, being a bit different like, so politely declined them citing that young men like them would make too much noise.

"Oh no, not us, we're hard working medical students who study hard and quietly pray"

She mumbled further baseless excuses and saw them politely on their way.


Then two weeks later 9/11 happened and she reflects on all this piety and phoned up the police to describe their behaviour as suspicious.


The bit that truly galled my friend was that instead of humouring or rebuffing her, they agreed with her that that was suspicious and duly went off to feel their collars!


I can't help but feel, when reading every tired thread on this forum about how anyone who doesn't immediately tick every box of what a good east dulite should act/look like is worthy of a sharpened pitchfork, that our society has somehow eneded up a little fucked-up.


Our instincts to interpret our surroundings and spot danger are seriously badly wired, and I'm pretty sure have been rendered so by years of dramatic news reports which skew our view of the world and our ability to interpet it.


Much as this forum has been a part of my life I do think it's partly responsible. Far from helping to create community it ends up sowing fear and mistrust; too much credence is lent to every half-baked rumour, every second hand anecdote.


God knows there are enough real problems our kids have to face, peer pressure to resist, bad crowds to avoid, without seeing a paedophile in every street photographer, market researcher and care in the community chap who is just a bit different to you with less refined social skills.


 

Well, to be fair, he'd have been in breach of the code of conduct of any professional marketing firm on many levels: approaching minors, failing to ask permission of a parent or guardian, failing to hand over proof of identity, failing to offer a record of the conversation to the candidate, failing to explain what the data was to be used for, failing to inform them of their rights and data protection and much more.


Some things are unclear - where did this talk of money come from? It didn't seem to be in the OP?


Did the bloke actually ask for addresses and phone numbers - the OP only mentioned that they didn't give them?


Having said that, professional market researchers actually would have been obliged to ask the candidate if they would mind being contacted by an auditor to verify their contribution.


My guess is that he was probably a student of some kind, or perhaps a small business person, looking to get some fairly amateur data to back up some sort of project or business plan.


I tend to agree that approaching a pack of hungry wolves gaggle of 13 year old girls is a fairly inefficient way of trying to get up to no good.

Hugo, did you just agree with everything I said? But say it, you know, after me...?


But El Pibe yeah, I can't disagree with a word of what you said.


I feel the same about the rage directed at chuggers, or people selling tat door to door. I used to enjoy a visit from the pop man - now people post on here because someone knocked on their door in a suspect manner. I'm inclined to think that we're no better, no worse, than we've ever been, just more paranoid. And while we may mock the Daily Mail a lot on here (and let's face it, what's not to mock?) oftentimes this forum makes a pretty good stand-in.

Huguenot/Rosie's interpretations on balance seem rather more plausible that a sexual predator with a clipboard fetish.


It is weird that because there was an Ian Huntley we treat all unknown men as paedophiles and throw up our barriers accordingly, because you know, it has happened so it could happen. Yet the chances of it actually happening are statistically significantly lower than, say the chances of them crashing in an aeorplane on our holiday, even though we know it could happen because we've seen it on the news.


I realise there's a more emotive element to the bogey man over dumb luck but when we do let it affect us and they we we interact with our neighbours and peers, surely we owe it to ourselves and our children to scrutinise ourselves and our behavoiurs a little more.


Or it really is just me and I'm a bit weird?


*ets - x posted with rosie, cheers babes ;) *

RosieH! You weren't there when I started writing it! i just got distracted by this appalling show called Gordon Ramsay Cookalong Live.


You've probably seen it and had it taken of air a few years ago, but first time I've seen it here.


I was shocked by how bad it was. Open mouthed.


*ets - Yes! 2008. Four years they've had to realise how cack this is. Shoot someone.

Just a quick point. Someone stated that the research was about social networks?

Most social network research does collect peoples names (which is not generally done in survey research to increase anonymity) too allow the researcher to show relationships between people.


Any serious researcher should have obtained a consent form from the parents of the teenagers as they are minors however.



So I think the protocol was dodgy, but not necessarily the activity.

How does this consent from parents happen then?


Approach a gang of youths and say "would you mind popping off home and getting permission from your parents? No.. Don't worry I'll do it. Just tell me where you live and I'll go and ask them. Meet you all back here in say... 60 minutes?"

woodrot Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Im up for a lynch mob if anyone else is

> interested. Theres a bloke down the street with

> his eyes too close together - we could start with

> him


I think we would need someone by the name of 'Lynch' to do it properly... though I'm not sure... will pop into local park and ask a few kids.

maxxi Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------


> I think we would need someone by the name of 'Lynch' to do it properly... though I'm not

> sure... will pop into local park and ask a few kids.


You do realise the little sods want paying nowadays?

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Given her role, she pretty much had to go. I don't think she is an avid tax-schemer who deliberately set out to avoid tax - I do pretty much believe her story of multiple high-profile roles and looking after a child with needs. But many regular voters juggle demanding jobs and families and are afforded no leeway by taxman, so she totally should have known better But here we are - she was found to be negligent and now she has suffered teh consequence. To me that its the OPPOSITE of all parties/politicians as generally the ignore the whole thing (today we have Tice saying Farage's tax affairs are of no interest to voters for example) And it would be poor form to not acknowledge why she was targeted quite so viciously - we even have posters on here here saying "when I saw her taping on a boat that was the  end for me" - like the end of what?. Her gender and class were clear motivators for many people. Two wrongs don't make a right - but it';s interesting to see some posters on here give so many others a blank cheque. Many are planning to vote for Farage despite his dishonesty being 100x worse than Rayner PS - I don't think she will join Corbyn party - unlike him she is smart and unlike him she recognises that being In power means you can at least stand a chance of delivering results This. The Greens will have a rise in the polls on back of new leader but that is one hell of a coalition of NIMBY/YIMBYs As what would Reform do if in government to help with... well, anything?   Labour can at least point to decreasing waiting lists, lower immigration numbers, not having a different PM every 6 months - not that anyone is listening
    • So what do people want?  More housing.  More affordable housing.  But not in my back yard. That applies to urban areas too.  Easy to criticise, but where are your answers?
    • this doesn't mean anything - it's a word salad with no reference to the topic at hand. And given the video I posted it's notable that you didn't reference it at all. The subject is the proliferation of weird intimidating Flag wavers....    As for me, I didn't vote Labour at last election, nor will I in next election (if I lived in a Labour/Tory/Reform marginal, that might be different)
    • Her legacy will be the Deputy leader/Housing Secretary who was the Labour party's sleaze crime fighter who broke the ministerial code for not paying enough stamp duty on one of her houses. As Housing Secretary she probably should have known better.    I wonder if she will defect to Corbyn where she will no doubt be welcomed with open arms and the words: "You did nothing wrong, it was all a media conspiracy comrade......"
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...