Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Residents within the catchment area for the new health centre in Dulwich are being invited to send in their suggestions for naming the new health facility.


https://www.southwarknews.co.uk/news/your-chance-to-name-new-health-centre-in-dulwich/?fbclid=IwAR2cvn6ex0K2juzr0nOKE7Jl9lIjS3YD4o17ktSvo3x2kRjQqn_hAj1Ay9Y


'Please be as creative as you like, but do bear in mind that the final name needs to be suitable for an NHS community health centre'

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/229813-naming-of-new-health-centre/
Share on other sites

Penguin68 Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I suppose Healthy McHealth Face is off the agenda?



You're off your face with that suggestion my friend



How about something catchy like "health centre"? Said what it does


Or "Sick people building" 🤔

Rosetta Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Does anyone know what is going to happen to the

> original building?

>

> Melbourne Grove/Concordia, who won the bid for

> this, currently has problems recruiting and

> retaining GPs for their existing surgery, so how

> are they going to recruit for this place?


Once the new health centre building is complete and commissioned and the services that are currently run from the hospital building transferred, the central "chateaux" is being retained as part of the Charter School (God knows why but that's my opinion) and the remainder will be bulldozed to make way for additional school buildings / open space.


I seem to vaguely remember that it could take until 2021 for the existing building to be decommissioned.

nxjen Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Residents within the catchment area for the new

> health centre in Dulwich are being invited to send

> in their suggestions for naming the new health

> facility.

>

> https://www.southwarknews.co.uk/news/your-chance-t

> o-name-new-health-centre-in-dulwich/?fbclid=IwAR2c

> vn6ex0K2juzr0nOKE7Jl9lIjS3YD4o17ktSvo3x2kRjQqn_hAj

> 1Ay9Y

>

> 'Please be as creative as you like, but do bear in

> mind that the final name needs to be suitable for

> an NHS community health centre'


How about the "Can-I-have-some-of-the-?350-million-a-week-please-Boris Health Centre"

The Mary Seacole Centre - it is on the site of the old Dulwich Maternity Hospital and Mary Seacole is credited with good quality maternity medical care.


In Jamaica in the late eighteenth and early nineteenth centuries, neonatal deaths were more than a quarter of total births, at a time when British-Jamaican planter Thomas Thistlewood wrote about European doctors employing questionable practices such as mercury pills and the bleeding of the patient. However, Seacole, using traditional West African herbal remedies and hygienic practices, boasted that she never lost a mother or her child.


Her links to Southwark, it has to be said, are tenuous, but not to London itself and there is a statue to her outside St Thomas'.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Counterpoint: there was zero misrepresentation of truth    never mind the bbc or the uk (for now)-  his own country and government impeached him for trying to overturn an election.  What happened was unforgivable. Trump adding a few “non violent”’ legally wise words absolves him of nothing  but back to bbc and uk.  They were correct and now we have Trump threatening to sue for a billion have English people lost all self-respect (that question was answers 9 years ago and is repeated almost daily) 
    • Point is.. top two have quit.. BBC is now what? From being well respected world wide.. not only for news, programs, no idea about pod casts.. Only thing we as a country do well currently is broadcast remembrance service…. Lets face it.. only country that I know of who can release wrong people from jail.. one gave himself up if news is to believed and the other is where? Only country I know of who actually pay people to leave, flights etc and they are back in country .. all heard via Radio 4…  
    • It doesn't matter what channel it was on, how pernicious the subject is and when it happened. Mis-representing the truth in broadcast is not only morally wrong, it's against the OFCOM code of ethics.  Everyone in the industry is trained in how not to do it, most are made to take the BBC's own 'Safeguarding the Trust' course, even if they aren't making BBC programmes.  There wasn't much fuss at the time, because no one knew about it.  "Unless you hate Britain, hate liberals, hate the BBC, want a divided country, support the most powerful person in the world despite his many failings". What the programme makers personally think or feel should never affect how they tell a story; to do so is deeply unprofessional and a sackable offence.  It's the job of the BBC and of all programming to inform viewers of the facts and let them make up their own minds. Even in campaigning documentaries.   
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...