Jump to content

Wanted: someone to remove 2 x trees including stumps in SE22


Recommended Posts

We are looking for someone to provide a quote to remove 2 x trees including stumps and roots (i.e. full removal) and to take all resulting waste away. Both trees are under 20 years old but around 20-25ft in height and in a back garden of a terraced house with no side access. No tree preservation orders are in place.


One tree is a mock acacia, the other is a wild cherry plum.


Quotes and work needed ASAP please.


Please contact me direct or with recommendations - via EDF or by text on 07941 780 708.


Thanks.

It's interesting that Southwark never cut the stumps down. We have recently had subsidence and although the repairs have been completed Douthwark have left the offending tree stump of about 2 and a half feet high. We are trying to get them to agree to remove the entire thing but not having much luck so far. Not sure of the reason for leaving stumps?

cella Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> It's interesting that Southwark never cut the

> stumps down. We have recently had subsidence and

> although the repairs have been completed Douthwark

> have left the offending tree stump of about 2 and

> a half feet high. We are trying to get them to

> agree to remove the entire thing but not having

> much luck so far. Not sure of the reason for

> leaving stumps?


Treat it yourself with a big drill and stump killer...

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Latest Discussions

    • I'm a bit worried by your sudden involvement on this Forum.  The former Prince Andrew is now Andrew Mountbatten Windsor Mountbatten in an anglicisation of Von Battenburg adopted by that branch of our Royal Family in 1917 due to anti-German sentiment. Another anglicisation could be simply Battenburg as in the checker board cake.  So I surmise that your are Andrew Battenburg, aka Andrew Mountbatten Windsor and that you have infiltrated social media so that the country can put the emphasis on Mandelson ather than yourself.  Bit of a failure. I don't expect an answer from police custody.  
    • We had John fit our PLYKEA kitchen (IKEA cabinets with custom doors) and would happily recommend him and Gabi to anyone. Gabi handled all communication and was brilliant throughout — responsive and happy to answer questions however detailed. John is meticulous, cares about the small details, and was a pleasure to have in the house. The carpentry required for the custom doors was done to a high standard, and he even refinished the plumbing under the sink to sit better with the new cabinets — a small touch that made a real difference. They were happy to return and tie up a few things that couldn't be finished in the time, which we appreciated. No hesitations recommending them.
    • Not sure about that. Rockets seems to have (rightly in my view) identified two key motivating elements in Mcash's defection: anger at his previous (arguably shabby) treatment and a (linked) desire to trash the Labour party, nationally and locally. The defection, timed for maximum damage, combined with the invective and moral exhibitionism of his statement counts as rather more than a "hissy fit".  I would add a third motivation of political ambition: it's not inconceivable that he has his eye on the Dulwich & West Norwood seat which is predicted to go Green.  James Barber was indulging in typical LibDem sleight of hand, claiming that Blair introduced austerity to *councils* before the coalition. This is a kind of sixth form debating point. From 1997-1999 Labour broadly stuck to Tory spending totals, meaning there was limited growth in departmental spending, including local govt grants. However local government funding rose substantially in the Noughties, especially in education and social care. It is a matter of record that real-terms local authority spending increased in the Blair / Brown years overall. So he's manifestly wrong (or only right if the focus is on 1997-1999, which would be a bizarre focus and one he didn't include in his claim) but he wasn't claiming Blair introduced austerity more widely. 
    • My view is that any party that welcomes a self-declared Marxist would merit a negative point. 
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...