Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Irony.


You see when you respond to a tired and dull enquiry with a hackneyed cliche, everyone gets the point except you. It's supposed to be tired and dull, that's the point deadhead ;-)


It's a meta-observation that diminishes the original enquiry in a friendly way without being patronising.


Therein lies the humour.


Are you for real?

Huguenot, do you really think that your responses ?diminish the original enquiry in a friendly way without being patronising?? I don?t think so.


I don?t know why the OP asked the question, but you seem to think that whatever their motivation a sensible response is not merited. Maybe they live on Frogley Road and are concerned for their safety, or for their property, or that they need to be at an appointment in 10 minutes and the coppers have blocked their car in. Or maybe they?re just nosy. Either way, I understood that the EDF welcomed practical discussion as well as idle gossip.


Remember, if people stop posting on here in case their post is deemed ?tired and dull? by the EDF elite, you?d have no-one to belittle and confuse with your pseudo-intellectual responses. Also, I think anyone who spends a lot of time on an internet forum is not best qualified to pass judgment on what is ?tired and dull?.

Worker Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

>

> I don?t know why the OP asked the question,


...nor I but it was phrased as an idle by-the-way kinda question and not a life or death panicking 'please inform me' deal


Maybe they live

> on Frogley Road and are concerned for their

> safety, or for their property,


...hmm, they might just have mentioned that.


or that they need

> to be at an appointment in 10 minutes and the

> coppers have blocked their car in.


... they definitely would have mebntioned that (and possibly noted it on the "little things blah blah irrational rage etc." thread).


Or maybe

> they?re just nosy.


Yeppers!


> Remember, if people stop posting on here in case

> their post is deemed ?tired and dull? by the EDF

> elite, you?d have no-one to belittle and confuse

> with your pseudo-intellectual responses. Also, I

> think anyone who spends a lot of time on an

> internet forum is not best qualified to pass

> judgment on what is ?tired and dull?.



Let's just say Huge does use the prefix 'meta-' far too much ;-)

Once twice thrice have I loved you

Before I knew your name

Slowly silently have I burnt

Consum?d in passions flame

When have I ever been

Without your thoughts my love

An entire universe having seen

In your eyes do I rest my love

Come settle on my lids like stardust

Sparkle like jewels rare sublime

Let all other thoughts fade as rust

Only you I treasure till the end of Time

20 years after I first read it, till makes the hairs on the back of my neck stand up....


Rather at once our time devour

Than languish in his slow-chapt power.

Let us roll all our strength and all

Our sweetness up into one ball,

And tear our pleasures with rough strife

Thorough the iron gates of life:

Thus, though we cannot make our sun

Stand still, yet we will make him run.

Great post, spot on.


Worker Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Huguenot, do you really think that your responses

> ?diminish the original enquiry in a friendly way

> without being patronising?? I don?t think so.

>

> I don?t know why the OP asked the question, but

> you seem to think that whatever their motivation a

> sensible response is not merited. Maybe they live

> on Frogley Road and are concerned for their

> safety, or for their property, or that they need

> to be at an appointment in 10 minutes and the

> coppers have blocked their car in. Or maybe

> they?re just nosy. Either way, I understood that

> the EDF welcomed practical discussion as well as

> idle gossip.

>

> Remember, if people stop posting on here in case

> their post is deemed ?tired and dull? by the EDF

> elite, you?d have no-one to belittle and confuse

> with your pseudo-intellectual responses. Also, I

> think anyone who spends a lot of time on an

> internet forum is not best qualified to pass

> judgment on what is ?tired and dull?.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • CPR Dave, attendance records are available on Southwark's website. Maggie Browning has attended 100% of meetings. Jon Hartley has attended 65%.
    • I do hope NOT, wouldn't trust Farage as far as I could throw him, Starmer & co.  He's backed by GB News which focus's predominantly on immigration while the BBC focus predominantly on the Israel - Gazza conflict.   
    • Everyone gets the point that Corbynites try to make with the "total number of votes cast" statistic, it's just a specious one.  In 2017, Corbyn's Labour got fewer votes than May's Tories (both the percentage of votes and aggregate number of votes). In 2019, Corbyn's Labour fewer votes than Johnson's Tories (both the percentage of votes and aggregate number of votes); and he managed to drop 2.7 million votes or 6.9% of vote share between the two elections. I repeat, he got trounced by Boris F***ing Johnson and the Tories after the Brexit omnishambles. It is not true that a "fairer" electoral system would have seen Labour beat the Tories: Labour simply got fewer votes than the Tories. Corbyn lost twice. There is no metric by which he won the general election. His failure to win was a disaster for the UK, and let Johnson and Truss and Sunak into office. Corbynites have to let go of this delusion that Corbyn but really won somehow if you squint in a certain way. It is completely irrelevant that Labour under Corbyn got more votes than Labour under Starmer. It is like saying Hull City was more successful in its 2014 FA Cup Final than Chelsea was in its 2018 FA Cup Final, because Hull scored 2 goals when Chelsea only scored 1. But guess what - Chelsea won its game and Hull City lost. Corbyn's fans turned out to vote for him - but an even larger group of people who found him repellant were motivated enough to show up and vote Tory.
    • I guess its the thing these days to demonstrate an attitude, in this instance seemingly of the negative kind, instead of taking pride in your work and have standards then 🤷‍♀️
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...