Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Actually it was a reasonably serious question.. I don't know the area so was wondering if anyone could advise. Obviously my friend doesn't stay in hotels all that often round ED way, so I figured the forum was a reasonable place to ask in.

Also 'another one'? Sorry I'm not sure what you mean by that..

Viccy Inn's no good. If you stand on the traffic island on Bellenden Road you can see even a reasonably well holstered arse on the upstroke through the top windows.


Actress has no locks on the doors, and the polis have it under surveillance from the safe house opposite. They sell playing away shaggers' deets to the local PIs (at least the ones they haven't already axed in Sydenham pub car parks).


I'd say that only leaves the two secret rooms above Green & Blue. You have to go through the kitchen to get there, but at least there's a decent drop avaiable with which to drown the guilt, fear and self-loathing.


HTH.

An adulterous friend of mine recommends the Camberwell Church Street Hotel Following marathon-long sessions in the bedroom he and his mistress realised they were rather hungry having skipped dinner, and apparently there's loads of good places to eat locally that are open pretty late/early... if you can drag yourselves away from your hotel room.


#HTH

Girl82 Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> How about the East Dulwich Hotel on Upland Road?

> Very seedy looking place! And nobody would ever

> find you in there.


This is true and if you enter via the third door (walking away from LL) you can get access to the 'jerk' room where you may be able to meat meet like-minded pals.

Pickle Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I'll rent you my loft rooms if you'd like.

> Discretion guaranteed (for a price) and we live in

> the safe part of East Dulwich, away from the rogue

> drunks and the like that you run the risk of

> encountering down the Peckham end.


No Hidden cameras or Recording Equipment. ???


Fox

I like the idea of Green & Blue, that way you're not far from the "Do It Yourself" shop if one of you doesn't turn up.


Seriously, if this is a genuine question, and presumably only the OP knows for sure, you're really covering the total humiliation angle if one or both of the other partners does discover you - bravo.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Girls In Your City - No Selfie - Anonymous Casual Dating https://SecreLocal.com [url=https://SecreLocal.com] Girls In Your City [/url] - Anonymous Casual Dating - No Selfie New Girls [url=https://secrelocal.com/girl/vanessa-100.html]Vanessa[/url] [url=https://secrelocal.com/girl/vanessa-100.html]Vanessa[/url] [url=https://secrelocal.com/girl/molly-15.html]Molly[/url] [url=https://secrelocal.com/girl/cheryl-blossom-48.html]Cheryl Blossom[/url] [url=https://secrelocal.com/girl/carola-conymegan-116.html]Carola Conymegan[/url] [url=https://secrelocal.com/girl/pupa-41.html]Pupa[/url] [url=https://secrelocal.com/girl/mia-candy-43.html]Mia Candy[/url]
    • This is a remarkable interpretation of history. Wikipedia (with more footnotes and citations than you could shake a shitty stick at sez: The austerity programme was initiated in 2010 by the Conservative and Liberal Democrat coalition government. In his June 2010 budget speech, Osborne identified two goals. The first was that the structural current budget deficit would be eliminated to "achieve [a] cyclically-adjusted current balance by the end of the rolling, five-year forecast period". The second was that national debt as a percentage of GDP would fall. The government intended to achieve both of its goals through substantial reductions in public expenditure.[21] This was to be achieved by a combination of public spending cuts and tax increases amounting to £110 billion.[26] Between 2010 and 2013, the Coalition government said that it had reduced public spending by £14.3 billion compared with 2009–10.[27] Growth remained low, while unemployment rose. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_Kingdom_government_austerity_programme From memory, last time around they were against the LTNs and competing with the Tories to pick up backlash votes - both failed. They had no counterproposals or ideas about how to manage congestion or pollution. This time around they're simply silent on the matter: https://www.southwark-libdems.org.uk/your-local-lib-dem-team/goosegreen Also, as we have seen from Mr Barber's comments on the new development on the old Jewsons yard, "leading campaigns to protect the character of East Dulwich and Goose Green" is code for "blocking new housing".
    • @Insuflo NO, please no, please don't encourage him to post more often! 😒
    • Revealing of what, exactly? I resurrected this thread, after a year, to highlight the foolishness of the OP’s op. And how posturing would be sagacity is quickly undermined by events, dear boy, events. The thread is about Mandelson. I knew he was a wrong ‘un all along, we all did; the Epstein shit just proves it. In reality, Kinnock, Blair, Brown, Starmer et all knew as well but accepted it, because they found him useful. As did a large proportion of the 2024 intake of Labour MPs who were personally vetted and approved by Mandelson.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...