Jump to content

Recommended Posts

M&S is proposing four deliveries between 6am to 7am every day of the year with increased deliveries over the busy holiday periods.


Iceland have their deliveries after 8am so not to disturb their neighbour's sleep.


As for your question Ted, a furniture shop, as an example, could have their deliveries after 9am or later.

What about the general economic uplift M&S would Bring. With the Jobs they are creating directly they will probably benefit workers in other shops by increasing footfall. So even if the 'poor' don't shop at M&S they will benefit from the jobs created.

There will also be cleaning jobs, maintenance work etc etc. I really cant see how M&S will damage anything.

They said the same thing about Sainsbury's on Dog Kennel Hill and Yes butchers and greengrocers closed but it hardly killed off LLane,

Blight.

1.

a. Any of numerous plant diseases resulting in sudden conspicuous wilting and dying of affected parts, especially young, growing tissues.

b. The condition or causative agent, such as a bacterium, fungus, or virus, that results in blight.

2. An extremely adverse environmental condition, such as air pollution.

3. Something that impairs growth, withers hopes and ambitions, or impedes progress and prosperity.

v. blight?ed, blight?ing, blights

v.tr.

1. To cause (a plant, for example) to undergo blight.

2. To have a deleterious effect on; ruin. See Synonyms at blast.

v.intr.

To suffer blight.

Iceland is a very profitable company where sales were up by 15% compared to 2.5% by M&S food. Furthermore, Iceland was bought by their management. Given its profitability and cash reserves of ?150m they're well placed for expansion and acquisitions.


This isn't about Iceland as an expanding company, this is about whether Iceland sees its Lordship Lane site as a good continuing investment. See my earlier posts, but every site is examined to see whether it's optimal for the company leasing it.


Of course, it is possible that the site owner, together with M&S, is flying a development kite, and that Iceland is keeping its powder dry, hoping the plan will be turned down and Iceland will be left as the only game in town (and with bargaining power) and that's what the 'keep Iceland' brigade must be hoping as well.


But is is also very possible that Iceland considers other sites will give it a better long-term return and isn't interested in renewing the lease. My guess is that it will have been given the first option so to do, if only because continuity is better for the landlord than a gap in rental income, unless they can get a new leaseholder to co-fund development.

Hi UDP


"Or is it a case that you don't give a care to people's blighted lives as long as you can get your M&S goodies locally?"


Nothing really to do with that - I get mine at London Bridge when in the mood but normally shop around Forest Hill road. I don?t particularly rate M and S as a food retailer. Regarding the blight, I would prefer to consider the quiet views of the majority over the minor view of those whose lives really aren?t going to be affected that much by a change in Supermarket.


However it?s more to do with the fact that you are trying to turn your personal agenda about parking into ?a fight to save lordship lane?. It seems you don?t even shop on the lane that much anyway?


?M&S represents naffness and isn't a draw for customers who have discerning taste. They, like myself, will travel down to Brixton Village where you can get the full works of independent retailers and more importantly, surrounded by cool minded people.?


?I like all things cool so I'll be avoiding M&S on Lordship Lane and spending more time in Brixton and Spitalfield as their retail environment tends to cater more to my exquisite tastes.?


Maybe we and the lane are not cool enough for you,


And then you mention clone towns. How will M and S (a chain store) replacing Iceland (another chain store) make Lordship lane a clone town?


Lordship lane is already a clone town / street ? the majority of estate agents / supermarket / banks / pubs are chains. The joy of the lane is the independent shops which are in the majority maintained by the increasing affluence of East Dulwich and in most cases would welcome the M & S as it would bring in more footfall and trade. In fact the nearest non clone town is Rye Lane where the majority of stores (at least towards the rye end) are independent clothes shops and butchers. This is the area that you think the M and S should move to and improve its mix of shops?


?An M&S in Peckham would also help its own diversity of shops.?


Finally you don?t seem to know what you want to replace the Iceland or improve the lane.


?Lordship Lane could perhaps do with a gift shop chain as to up the competition. I do find stock in the local gift shops rather uninspiring to say the least?


?I rather see an independent retailer take over the site where it's more likely that the neighbours won't be disturbed by articulated Lorries at a very anti-social time and add further diversity of offerings to the shopper?




Poor attempt to turn a personal parking agenda into a campaign to prevent the "gentrification of Lordship Lane"

in answer to those who castigated me for saying east dulwich is a village, I refer you to local histories which state quite clearly that east dulwich is the largest of the villages that constitute dulwich. but does it really matter if east dulwich is a village, a small town or a middle class enclave or a haven for m&s groupies or waitrose wannabees or what the hell else? what I know is that it is a great place to live and run a shop... although I might be happier if undisputedtruth took her custom elsewhere.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Surprise, surprise. It didn't take them long, did it. This will be something of a test as to how much the council really care about parks and the environment. A footfall of 60,000. Are they mad? There is no way this park is designed for or can sustain that sort of use. Just had a look at the schedule. If allowed to go ahead, this will involve a large slice of the park (not the common) sectioned off and out of use for three weeks of May and the first week of June. Here's an idea, why not trial the festival in one of the other Southwark Parks, so the 'goodness' can be shared around the borough?
    • There was another unprovoked attack on Monday this week on a young woman nearby (Anstey Road) at 6.45pm. Don't have any other details, it was posted on a Facebook group by her flatmate. Pretty worrying  https://www.facebook.com/share/p/1EGfDrCAST/
    • OMFG is it possible for the council to do anything without a bunch of armchair experts moaning about it? The library refurb is great news, as it's lovely but completely shagged out - the toilets don't even work reliably. Other libraries in the area will be open longer house during the closure. July is a rubbish time to begin a refurb because it's just before the entire construction sector goes on summer holiday, and it would mean delaying the work another 8 months.
    • Licensing application for 2026 has gone in and they want to extend the event from 4 to 7 days accross two weekends.  There are some proposed significant changes to be aware of:   Event proposal moves to two separate weekends Number of days of the festival moves from 4 to 7 meaning also a change in the original licence is required Expected footfall in the park over the two weekends around 60,000.    Dear Peckham Rye Park Stakeholder,   Re: STAKEHOLDER CONSULTATION – event application: ‘GALA and On The Rye Festival 2026’ – ref: SWKEVE000935   We are writing to you because you have previously identified yourself as someone who wishes to be informed about event applications for Peckham Rye Park, or we think that you might have an interest in knowing about this particular event application.   Please be aware that the council are in receipt of an event application for: GALA and On The Rye Festival 2026’   In line with the council’s Outdoor Events Policy and events application process we are carrying out consultation regarding this application.   The following reference documents are attached to this email:   Consultation information APPENDIX A – site plan weekend 1 APPENDIX B – site plan weekend 2 APPENDIX C – Production Schedule APPENDIX D – 2025 Noise Management Plan   The consultation is open from Tuesday 4 November and will close at midnight on Tuesday 2 December 2025   Community engagement sessions will take place on Wednesday 19 November.   If you would like to comment on application: SWKEVE000935 and take part in the online consultation, please visit:   www.southwark.gov.uk/GALA2026   If you have any questions, please don’t hesitate to contact us.     Kind Regards, Southwark Events Team Environment and Leisure PO Box 64529 London SE1P 5LX 020 7525 3639 @SouthwarkEvents APPENDIX A - SITE PLAN weekend 1.pdf APPENDIX B - SITE PLAN weekend 2.pdf APPENDIX C - PRODUCTION SCHEDULE.pdf And just to add that councillor Renata Hamvas chairs the licensing committee. Worth contacting her with views on ammendments to the original license. I am fairly sure she won't grant any amendments, but just in case.....
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...