Jump to content

Recommended Posts

fishbiscuits Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> In my experience, there isn't much savings to be

> made anyway. The advantage is that you can refurb

> it to your taste/spec, but the discount such

> properties are offered at is not generous.


Tbh I'd rather not buy refurbished property savings or no because I invariably hate what the developer had done and would have to spend a fortune undoing it and doing it to my taste.

In an ideal world (OR rather MY ideal world) developers would just renew electrics and boilers and make good any disrepair fit a basic white ikea kitchen and then leave well alone.

my pet hates are; Recessed spotlights, Laminate flooring, Wall mounted t.v's,lowered ceilings,new window units that don't fully open, black sparkly granite,faux wenge wood, and beige : (

Actually being honest here I'm asking because I'm interested in selling a property that requires refurbishment - new kitchen ,new bathroom ,new flooring ,new windows ,replastered ceilings ,unfinished loft room ,repainting etc - but I couldn't see anything comparable on the market to give me an idea of price .

intexasatthe moment Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Actually being honest here I'm asking because I'm

> interested in selling a property that requires

> refurbishment - new kitchen ,new bathroom ,new

> flooring ,new windows ,replastered ceilings

> ,unfinished loft room ,repainting etc - but I

> couldn't see anything comparable on the market to

> give me an idea of price .


Price above average for a fully refurbed property. As properties requiring work are very rare in this location, buyers will pay a premium for them.

intexasatthe moment Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I would love that to be the case Blackcurrant but

> it seems a little... um .... counter intuitive ?


I'd say you're right, it's completely counter-intuitive since it means the buyer needs to factor in another ?100,000 just to get it to standard. It's not like moving into a property where everything is new(ish), functional etc but you just don't like the wallpaper.


Some friends spent about 12 years doing this more or less as a business. Started off buying a tiny 2-bed flat on the cheap - did it up nicely (doing almost all the work themselves), sold it for a decent profit, spent the money on a slightly bigger property, repeated this process. They ended up with a lovely 4-bedroom house that they now live in. It was a huge amount of hard work, juggling it with a full-time job initially but they were both very good DIYers, had access to a lot of the tools, paint etc and they made it work. Helped by an upturn in the market and the area, one of their properties got them over ?50,000 in clear profit.


The trick to selling is either to leave it as is and just say "needs extensive refurbishment" in which case the price won't be great unless it's an amazing location / unique house (there's a couple in the village that sold for big money even though they were in need of extensive modernisation just because they came onto the market so rarely) or to re-do it to a "plain" standard that is functional, safe and can be lived in while any further refurbishment is done "as and when" by the new buyer. Just need to price up the work that needs doing to bring it to that standard and the extra that you'll sell it for offset against when you want / need to move.

intexasatthe moment Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> it seems a little... um .... counter intuitive ?


I'm not so sure.


If you have the money to be able to afford a house for ?1.2m+, chances are that you also have the money to indulge your desires - and afford something pretty snazzy on the extension front.


An already-extended home completed with a relatively modest budget (which is a lot of them) is unlikely to satisfy demand for said snazziness - nor offer the architectural blank slate to add it to taste. To some people it will feel like they're paying extra for something they don't think is up to scratch - and might even cost more to alter compared to it not being there in the first place and they did it themselves.


I've seen a few recently completed extensions done by people relatively new to the area. They're a league away from a Quicklofts on top and PlusSpace on the bottom.

Following a death - hubby inherited a property which was divided into 3 flats - one flat was leased out but the remaining 2 flats needed extensive work on them. We were quoted ?60.000 (15 years ago) just for external repairs. i.e. guttering, damp course, replacement windows, repointing etc. That was without updating electrics and remodelling rooms i.e. grotty kitchen and bathroom, and all decorations. Hubby not practical and project was to big for me also we did not gave the cash to fork out for builders. In the end the sitting tenant got a mortgage and purchased the 2 flats from us (in 2 stages) and took a couple of years to modernise the place.


We sold it cheaply to get rid of the property- but in hindsight if we could have raised the repair money and had professionals in to do the work- we could have got over ?1 million for it as a large detached property in its own grounds

Angelina Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> that's just daft.


yes, it was tongue in cheek. But there is an element of truth in it. Buyers tend to underestimate what refurbishing costs and then bid up the price of run-down properties too much, wiping out any potential gains.


Extensions go out of fashion. In the 90s a mock victorian conservatory was a must have. Now it's all island units and bifold doors - "to bring the outside inside". Wait for that fad to pass and the few remaining unmolested victorian houses might well command a premium.

EPB Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> ?...wiping out any prospective gains.?

>

> True, but many people are looking for a home, not

> an investment.


Yup! agree

I think too many people buy places to make money out of them rather than just thinking 'do I love this house? do I like this area? is this 'home' "

Houses are places to live in and build memories in not just money making machines.

Maybe I'm a sentimental old fool but I firmly belive if you buy somewhere you love in an area thats right for your needs you'll never regret it.

Property speculators and investors have killed Londons 'villages'

Blackcurrant Wrote:

---------------------------------------------

>

> Extensions go out of fashion. In the 90s a mock

> victorian conservatory was a must have. Now it's

> all island units and bifold doors - "to bring the

> outside inside". Wait for that fad to pass and the

> few remaining unmolested victorian houses might

> well command a premium.



I have an unmolested house.


I hope you're right 🤣

  • 4 weeks later...
1,963 sq ft is not that "huge" when compared to the houses around Underhill, Marmora Rd etc, particularly because there is probably a limited ability to extend in any direction. It's just the street and a chance to be in a proper Georgian / early Victorian house.

KateS Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> ?1,750,000 "doer upper"

>

> https://www.rightmove.co.uk/property-for-sale/prop

> erty-82806968.html

>

> I know it's a massively desirable road, and a huge

> house, but I still find it hilarious.


If you think that's hilarious then what about this one on East Dulwich Grove - outside the catchment area for DVI.


https://www.harveywheeler.com/listings/east-dulwich-grove-se22-29063621/

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • bizarre responses from everyone but Cancerian 🤷🏾‍♀️ As an LL resident surely a perfectly normal enquiry in that one might wish to know who to look out for if lawless/feral kids are wreaking havoc? any distinguishing marks on the perpetrators? presumably the objection is that a physical description might reveal the alleged culprits as non-white? (nothing else makes sense with this bourgeois over-sensitivity). same botched thinking that causes police descriptions of suspects on the loose to omit this info  (top way to protect the public / solve the crime) FYI i'm a mixed-race female and interested in THE TRUTH. hence, i want to protect myself & my family against criminals. so please DESCRIBE the physical appearance of criminals or suspected criminals to help to keep us safe. thankyou.  "underlying agenda... strange" 😂😂😂 strange agenda to wish to be safe in my community. well played 🤯   working the nightshift here & getting mildly obsessed/infuriated with the peculiar responses. someone please explain how wishing to be able to attempt to identify, physically, the perpetrator(s) of an alleged local assault is "strange", with an "agenda"? God help us. (wait... "God"? must be a far-right religious maniac) "Unless there were distinctive features such as unusual clothing, how is that going to identify them"... green & purple mohican with accompanying buffalo 🦬 horns through the nose might do it; or simply hairstyle, skin colour, sartorial outfit... 🤔 "and even if it did, what would be the point, without photographic evidence that they had done anything wrong?" eyewitness reports? 😏    
    • Unless they were wearing school uniform with name tags otherwise children do change their clothes you know. 
    • I'd also recommend Silvano for anyone in the area looking to learn automatic, having just passed first time with 5 minors. He's a very patient teacher and ensured I learned how to drive safely above all. 
    • You don't need to do the research. I had to know the numbers as a TV buyer. I analysed the potential advertising revenue and Channel Four didn't cover their costs. They had some nice 'Channel Four' signs when someone hit the ropes but, In all honesty, a lot a potential revenue was lost because most old knackers were pissed off because they couldn't perve at Carol Vorderman on 'Countdown'.       Sorry, cross-post. I was replying to Malumbu. Give me a minute, if you will. I listened to the first two sessions (today) on TMS and popped down to the pub for the evening one.   I do miss the days of Peter West, Richie Benaud and Tom Graveney on BBC2.   But, the BBC are at least putting on 'Today At The Test' on at around 7pm instead of after midnight.   And it was on the 10pm news.      
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...