Jump to content

Recommended Posts

So you two wouldn't sell through this agent, even if you had the type of property that they had the best track record in selling - because of the blurb?


Or pass on TheHouseOfYourDreams? - for the same reason?




You're nuthin' but a lotta talk an' a badge.

*Bob* Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> So you two wouldn't sell through this agent, even

> if you had the type of property that they had the

> best track record in selling - because of the blurb?


You really think it makes a difference what they write? I don't.


> Or pass on TheHouseOfYourDreams? - for the same reason?


Probably not, but I would feel dirty (in a bad way).

Jeremy Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> You really think it makes a difference what they

> write? I don't.


No.. but you reckon you'd be put-off dealing with them because of it.


And come on.. feeling dirty is an inescapable part of buying or selling a house!

El Pibe Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> "Fab front door"

>

> This has to be lacquered in irony surely.

>

> Lollipop sticks in your spokes are fab, space dust

> is fab, not a grey slate front door.



Fab and Funky...

Annette Curtain Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> >

> Much like The Maudsley then

>

>

> :-S

>

> I'm down with W&S, as they got me a full asking

> price cash offer on my gaff (which I then turned

> down, as you do)


You must have been popular with your hopeful buyers. Why would you do that?

Gidget Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> You must have been popular with your hopeful buyers. Why would you do that?


Probably explained by a quote from the film Capricorn One...


Robert Caulfield: I'd like to hire your plane.

Albain: That'll be a hundred dollars.

[...]

Robert Caulfield: Okay, one hundred.

Albain: One hundred and twenty five.

Robert Caulfield: What?

Albain: Because you said yes to a hundred too quick, which means you can afford a hundred and twenty five.

If a Wooster & Stock description is winding you up, I think you have issues. It's what they do, like them or loathe them they certainly stand out from the crowd - as evidenced by this thread.


The photographs make the house look great, it might not be your style but I've got more then hunch that most of the people throwing rocks in this thread are doing so from a (badly designed) glass house.


*Shrugs*


If I had that sorta coin, I'd book a viewing - at least it's different from the endless stream of Victorian conversions that are churned out.

Gidget Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Annette Curtain Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > >

> > Much like The Maudsley then

> >

> >

> > :-S

> >

> > I'm down with W&S, as they got me a full asking

> > price cash offer on my gaff (which I then

> turned

> > down, as you do)

>

> You must have been popular with your hopeful

> buyers. Why would you do that?





What I should have written was "which I regrettably had to turn down"


The buyer/seller chain stagnated essentially.


I was well pleased with the offer, but didn't want to sell and be left in a vacuum renting.



Netts

Loz Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Hmmm, a bit thin-skinned on this on stevie_son.

> You wouldn't happen to have a connection with

> either W&S or the house vendor, would you?


Eh, I was only teasing Loz - of course you're entitled to your opinion. I just find it amusing that people have their panties in a twist because someone described a door as 'fab'.


But it's sunny outside so I'm going to stop arguing about stuff on the internet :)

stevie_son Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

I just find it amusing

> that people have their panties in a twist because

> someone described a door as 'fab'.



No one has their 'panties in a twist' stevie - we like it when young people use words like fab -


- just taking the piss because the description is fucking ridiculous for what looks like a 1980s Barrat home with rocks in the front garden... some find that funny .. some may even find the defence of it funny too... like a laugh, see when they get bored? (I have a tragically short attention span and can be distracted by

well said...and no it's not my house, or my taste - but I even quite enjoyed the W&S description. They're a bit like Roy Brooks' descriptions - overtly verbose, but isn't that the point of selling, providing one can read words?... Someone will love it and good luck to them I say.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • £14,000 last year which included £500 for scaffolding.
    • Maggie Browning usually very good responding to emails. Roving surgeries - we got a letter some time ago that they were in Barry Road between certain times - but neither neighbours of ourselves saw them. Face to face surgeries rarely held now due to violent attacks on MPS and Councillors.
    • Just for information: I see that the Licensing Sub-committee has the Tesco application as item 1 on their 24 July meeting agenda.  https://moderngov.southwark.gov.uk/ieListDocuments.aspx?CId=172&MId=8329. The officer's report to the committtee provides a good succinct summary.  I see, from (original) p.31 of the full public pack, (or more conveniently the supporting documents) that Tesco Legal Dept on 12 June reported that they'd agreed with the police's suggested conditions to be attached to the licence, and the police accordingly withdrew their own representation.  That leaves just one representation, from a member of the public, to be dealt with on the day. I still think it's not necessarily to be presumed that Tesco will definitely be taking over the premises.  I see that Poundland themselves were granted an off-sales licence on 21 Feb 2023, and surrendered it on 3 July 2025.  I'm not sure they actually ever used it themselves.  Did they? https://www.southwark.gov.uk/sites/default/files/2024-09/Statement of Licensing Policy 2021-2026.pdf is a full statement of the policy and its application, for thems as is interested.
    • I'm now just following David Peckham around, posting laughing emojis on all his comments.   
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...