Jump to content

Recommended Posts

So you two wouldn't sell through this agent, even if you had the type of property that they had the best track record in selling - because of the blurb?


Or pass on TheHouseOfYourDreams? - for the same reason?




You're nuthin' but a lotta talk an' a badge.

*Bob* Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> So you two wouldn't sell through this agent, even

> if you had the type of property that they had the

> best track record in selling - because of the blurb?


You really think it makes a difference what they write? I don't.


> Or pass on TheHouseOfYourDreams? - for the same reason?


Probably not, but I would feel dirty (in a bad way).

Jeremy Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> You really think it makes a difference what they

> write? I don't.


No.. but you reckon you'd be put-off dealing with them because of it.


And come on.. feeling dirty is an inescapable part of buying or selling a house!

El Pibe Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> "Fab front door"

>

> This has to be lacquered in irony surely.

>

> Lollipop sticks in your spokes are fab, space dust

> is fab, not a grey slate front door.



Fab and Funky...

Annette Curtain Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> >

> Much like The Maudsley then

>

>

> :-S

>

> I'm down with W&S, as they got me a full asking

> price cash offer on my gaff (which I then turned

> down, as you do)


You must have been popular with your hopeful buyers. Why would you do that?

Gidget Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> You must have been popular with your hopeful buyers. Why would you do that?


Probably explained by a quote from the film Capricorn One...


Robert Caulfield: I'd like to hire your plane.

Albain: That'll be a hundred dollars.

[...]

Robert Caulfield: Okay, one hundred.

Albain: One hundred and twenty five.

Robert Caulfield: What?

Albain: Because you said yes to a hundred too quick, which means you can afford a hundred and twenty five.

If a Wooster & Stock description is winding you up, I think you have issues. It's what they do, like them or loathe them they certainly stand out from the crowd - as evidenced by this thread.


The photographs make the house look great, it might not be your style but I've got more then hunch that most of the people throwing rocks in this thread are doing so from a (badly designed) glass house.


*Shrugs*


If I had that sorta coin, I'd book a viewing - at least it's different from the endless stream of Victorian conversions that are churned out.

Gidget Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Annette Curtain Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > >

> > Much like The Maudsley then

> >

> >

> > :-S

> >

> > I'm down with W&S, as they got me a full asking

> > price cash offer on my gaff (which I then

> turned

> > down, as you do)

>

> You must have been popular with your hopeful

> buyers. Why would you do that?





What I should have written was "which I regrettably had to turn down"


The buyer/seller chain stagnated essentially.


I was well pleased with the offer, but didn't want to sell and be left in a vacuum renting.



Netts

Loz Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Hmmm, a bit thin-skinned on this on stevie_son.

> You wouldn't happen to have a connection with

> either W&S or the house vendor, would you?


Eh, I was only teasing Loz - of course you're entitled to your opinion. I just find it amusing that people have their panties in a twist because someone described a door as 'fab'.


But it's sunny outside so I'm going to stop arguing about stuff on the internet :)

stevie_son Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

I just find it amusing

> that people have their panties in a twist because

> someone described a door as 'fab'.



No one has their 'panties in a twist' stevie - we like it when young people use words like fab -


- just taking the piss because the description is fucking ridiculous for what looks like a 1980s Barrat home with rocks in the front garden... some find that funny .. some may even find the defence of it funny too... like a laugh, see when they get bored? (I have a tragically short attention span and can be distracted by

well said...and no it's not my house, or my taste - but I even quite enjoyed the W&S description. They're a bit like Roy Brooks' descriptions - overtly verbose, but isn't that the point of selling, providing one can read words?... Someone will love it and good luck to them I say.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Post much better this Xmas.  Sue posted about whether they send Xmas cards; how good the post is,  is relevant.  Think I will continue to stay off Instagram!
    • These have reduced over the years, are "perfect" lives Round Robins being replaced by "perfect" lives Instagram posts where we see all year round how people portray their perfect lives ?    The point of this thread is that for the last few years, due to issues at the mail offices, we had delays to post over Christmas. Not really been flagged as an issue this year but I am still betting on the odd card, posted well before Christmas, arriving late January. 
    • Two subjects here.  Xmas cards,  We receive and send less of them.  One reason is that the cost of postage - although interestingly not as much as I thought say compared to 10 years ago (a little more than inflation).  Fun fact when inflation was double digits in the 70s cost of postage almost doubled in one year.  Postage is not a good indication of general inflation fluctuating a fair bit.  The huge rise in international postage that for a 20g Christmas card to Europe (no longer a 20g price, now have to do up to 100g), or a cheapskate 10g card to the 'States (again have to go up to the 100g price) , both around a quid in 2015, and now has more than doubled in real terms.  Cards exchanged with the US last year were arriving in the New Year.  Funnily enough they came much quicker this year.  So all my cards abroad were by email this year. The other reason we send less cards is that it was once a good opportunity to keep in touch with news.  I still personalise many cards with a news and for some a letter, and am a bit grumpy when I get a single line back,  Or worse a round robin about their perfect lives and families.  But most of us now communicate I expect primarily by WhatApp, email, FB etc.  No need for lightweight airmail envelope and paper in one.    The other subject is the mail as a whole. Privitisation appears to have done it no favours and the opening up of competition with restrictions on competing for parcel post with the new entrants.  Clearly unless you do special delivery there is a good chance that first class will not be delivered in a day as was expected in the past.   Should we have kept a public owned service subsidised by the tax payer?  You could also question how much lead on innovation was lost following the hiving off of the national telecommunications and mail network.
    • Why have I got a feeling there was also a connection with the beehive in Brixton on that road next to the gym
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...