Jump to content

Recommended Posts

after having the grave misfortune of being duped into watching england on saturday evening, i don't want them to do well


i will be supporting germany and couldn't give a monkey's what anyone thinks- i'm happy to admit that i'm very much a fair weather england fan- all my football love is for tottenham


the only reason i'll watch the england games is to ensure parker and defoe don't get injured



i think france will surprise a few people


germany, spain, netherlands, france as semi-finalists


england to scrape second in the group and lose to spain in the q-final

Undisputedtruth Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I was petty much alarmed by the number of

> Liverpool players featured in yesterday's game.

> Especially as Liverpool had a mediocre season.



Why were you alarmed? It was a friendly, with 6 substituations allowed, and the manager's first chance to have a look at the players as the boss.

Given the dearth of English talent in the top teams it's harldy surprising to be dipping into the mediocre ones for a squad of 22.


Funny that it's liverpool causing such chagrin despite your pleas that you don't have an unhealthy obsession with them, you could have commented on the goalie having spent the whole season in the championship for instance!!

The only thing 'alarming' about the England performance was that it was like all the other pre-tourny performances...


Very Capello-like in their possession footy and in passing it around with an air of calm nonchalance and the usual disintegration into impotence in the second half...


all very sedate and unruffled... as usual...


until the first proper competitive game when they will all hurry the ball around as though it were a grenade with the pin out, pass badly, hit long balls and generally play with the fear, panic and lack of skill that has categorised England's major tournament performances for years.

Otta Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Undisputedtruth Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > I was petty much alarmed by the number of

> > Liverpool players featured in yesterday's game.

> > Especially as Liverpool had a mediocre season.

>

>

> Why were you alarmed? It was a friendly, with 6

> substituations allowed, and the manager's first

> chance to have a look at the players as the boss.



one of two warm-up games for a tournament in which he gave games to three players not going to said tournament (including one that didn't even make the stand-by list)


Baffling

I guess if you deeply care it could be alarming.


In my experience the majority of England fan's level of concern has withered from deep to marginal over the last 18 years or so.


Baffling is better, par for the course though so perhaps 'meh' would more accurately sum up reactions to the game.

"You are only as good as your weakest link" said my football coach during my playing days. And so most of these Liverpool players are weak links as far as I'm concern. However I do get this feeling that Carroll would perform well during the tournament. He was unplayable judging by his last two FA match appearances and is peaking at the right time. He would be a key player for England as long as he stays away from booze and women.

El Pibe Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> you could have

> commented on the goalie having spent the whole

> season in the championship for instance!!


Not quite, Green is a top class keeper as long as he keeps his nerves. Fortunately Joe Hart is world class and will give England the confidence to progress in the tournament.

Undisputedtruth Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> "You are only as good as your weakness link" said

> my football coach during my playing days.


Mine once said "Ohhhhh you are a bloody disgrace! Hey Baz!*... For missing the target from there you want bloody shooting!"




*He always called me that.

Undisputedtruth Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Hugo, *yawn*, I've been asked this question before

> and my standard response is I prefer to play

> football rather than supporting a team.



Hmmm... do you still play then? Will you admit who you support when you stop playing? I think that is a bog standard excuse for not coming out and admitting what team you support. Everybody who follows football supports a specific team. I expect you'll be the exception to the rule though.


Anyway..... back to the Euros.


Ummmm...... not much to report really apart from Birmingham City's keeper coming in for the injured Ruddy. What a ruddy shame for him.

Why the buggery fcuk is Jordan Henderson on standby for England if Lampard doesn't make it? He's had a crap season by anyone's standards. Roy Hodgson seems to be having a bit of a love in with Liverpool's players - Johnson, Downing, Gerrard and Carroll have all had very mediocre seasons. Why not Micah Richards, Adam Johnson, Aaron Lennon and Peter Crouch. All of whom have performed better over the same period.

I woldn't want to see Gerrard left out, and I genuinely think this could be Carroll's time to shine. I like Croutch, but I don't think he's really good enough against the top sides. Carroll may not be either, but it's his turn to have a chance.


Can't believe that Micah Richards & Aaron Lennon aren't going!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Pretty much, Sue, yeah. It's the perennial, knotty problem of imposing a tax and balancing that with the cost of collecting it.  The famous one was the dog licence - I think it was 37 1/2 pence when it was abolished, but the revenue didn't' come close to covering the administration costs. As much I'd love to have a Stasi patrolling the South Bank, looking for mullet haircuts, unshaven armpits, overly expressive hand movements and red Kicker shoes, I'm afraid your modern Continental is almost indistinguishable from your modern Londoner. That's Schengen for you. So you couldn't justify it from an ROI point of view, really. This scheme seems a pretty good idea, overall. It's not perfect, but it's cheap to implement and takes some tax burden off Southwark residents.   'The Man' has got wise to this. It's got bad juju now. If you're looking to rinse medium to large amounts of small denomination notes, there are far better ways. Please drop me a direct message if you'd like to discuss this matter further.   Kind Regards  Dave
    • "What's worse is that the perceived 20 billion black hole has increased to 30 billion in a year. Is there a risk that after 5 years it could be as high as 70 billion ???" Why is it perceived, Reeves is responsible for doubling the "black hole" to £20b through the public sector pay increases. You can't live beyond your means and when you try you go bankrupt pdq. In 4 yrs time if this Govt survives that long and the country doesn't go bust before then, in 2029 I dread to think the state the country will be in.  At least Sunak and co had inflation back to 2% with unemployment being stable and not rising.   
    • He seemed to me to be fully immersed in the Jeremy Corbyn ethos of the Labour Party. I dint think that (and self describing as a Marxist) would have helped much when Labour was changed under Starmer. There was a purge of people as far left as him that he was lucky to survive once in my opinion.   Stuff like this heavy endorsement of Momentum and Corbyn. It doesn't wash with a party that is in actual government.   https://labourlist.org/2020/04/forward-momentum-weve-launched-to-change-it-from-the-bottom-up/
    • I perceive the problem.simply as spending too much without first shoring up the economy.  If the government had reduced borrowing,  and as much as most hate the idea, reduced government deiartment spending (so called austerity) and not bowed to union pressures for pay rises, then encouraged businesses to grow, extra cash would have entered the coffers and at a later stage when the economy was in a stronger position rises in NI or taxes would have a lesser impact, but instead Reeves turned that on its head by increasing ni which has killed growth, increased prices and shimmied the economy.  What's worse is that the perceived 20 billion black hole has increased to 30 billion in a year. Is there a risk that after 5 years it could be as high as 70 billion ???     
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...