Jump to content

Recommended Posts

I live in SW London now and in the last week there has been an attempted abduction from the gates of a primary school - plus 2 or 3 other incidents which police say may be linked. Everyone is v jumpy obviously. In the past I have told my daughter about "bad men" in a fit of panic when she scooted right round a corner and out of sight from me. On the way home today I felt forced to reiterate it as she wouldn't stick near me and I feel that she should be within arms length really. But of course it's not just men.


I really have no idea what I am doing here and would appreciate any advice on how to tackle this. I know in her school in year 1 they have a talk about this. But I need her to know that she can't just scoot off miles away from me. She is also very friendly to adults and while it is clearly a good thing - I want to make sure she doesn't talk to random people if she is not right next to me. But I can also see I am in danger of totally freaking her out. I don;t want her to live her life in fear!


Susypx

and actually it's not just strangers and random people you have to be aware of. Awful things can happen to children by someone they know....Once you start thinking in terms of rules and dos and don'ts it becomes very complicated and can cause problems in itself, (eg..'bad men', 'stranger danger'). I think you are right not to try and freak her out. Personally I think building up a strong level of trust with our children and allowing them to be assertive and that they can say "no" to their parents and other adults is a good thing. If my son says "no" about something I try to respect it. The 'do as I say, not questions asked' attitude toward children is really not helping them protect themselves. Living in fear of all adults is not all that helpful either. They then don't learn who they can trust and sheltering them and not gradually giving them more freedom and independence actually creates other problems. As a child I had loads of freedom, as most kids did then, and we were mostly all aware of who to steer clear of. But different times...


I would have a chat (without using too many words) at a time when you are feeling calm...and not after she has just ridden off out of sight, when you are obviously feeling more stressed. I would explain that you care about her very much and you want to help her stay safe. There are probably some good books out there with a story, though most of those are with the stranger scenario. Hope that helps a bit. I am gradually talking to my son about this. I think it's an ongoing thing, as is building up a close and open relationship with our children.

My daughter will turn 4 soon and I often think about this too. We haven't had an official sit-down chat yet because I'm not sure how to approach it. I have mentioned things as they came up, e.g. when she found a friendly old lady scary and didn't want to talk to her I told her (on our way home) that it's ok to not talk to people that you don't feel comfortable with although it's generally polite to say hello. And I told her some grown ups don't really like children yet may pretend to be very nice but really aren't and that if anyone ever asked her to come along she should always say that she needs to ask mum/dad (or x, y, z names of her nursery school teachers that I trust) first. Of course this doesn't cover the "known people" issue but one step at a time... and I agree that a focus on kids daring to say no and trust their instincts combined with knowing they shouldn't accept any invitations without asking a trusted adult is a decent start.


Would be interested to know if there are books that deal with it in a positive way.

I've said that if an adult ever does something that they're not comfortable with they should get away, and if the adult tries to stop them they can scream as loudly as they can, kick, bite, anything's fair game. We put that in the context of - of course this will never happen to you, but there are some people, very few, who want to take other people's children. Though this came up a bit older when it was who could pick them up from school - if x came, that would be ok, if y came, what would you do? I think they have a very good sense of who trusted adults are. And always, if there's any doubt, stay at school, or find me to ask if you can go with someone.

In fact, I have been known to say - is a stranger dragging you away? Is the house on fire? Well, please stop screaming like that then...

To the OP though, I think you'd be lucky to keep a school aged child within arms reach, but I think in sight is reasonable - and no need to do too much of the bad men thing. Just I need to see you to check you're ok. If I can't see you I worry - because a car might come, or you might fall over, or a nasty person comes along, or the big bad wolf...

I would suggest using traditional tales to start a conversation with your daughter. Little Red Riding hood, Hansel and Gretel and the Wolf and the seven Little Kids are all good ones.


I agree that you don't want to freak her out, but I would agree with cuppa tea that it should be a person's behaviour towards your daughter and how it makes her feel that should trigger a 'stranger danger' response rather than her looking out for a 'bad man' who will probably come across as very friendly (refer to wolf tricks in above stories!) and can therefore be more dangerous.


Guidelines I find quite helpful with children of your daughter's age are:

That if they get lost, don't go off with anyone but find someone in a uniform to help them and

That it doesn't matter what anyone tells her, she can always tell you anything that is bothering her and that she will never be able to tell you anything that will stop you loving her.

They hopefully cover both (thankfully unlikely) situations where a child may come to harm from an adult.

The playful yes/no questioning thing works great for all kinds of things you want to teach kids by the way, great you brought it up EmilyE. We do things like "can you..... read a book while the (toddler) clock is still blue?" -yes. "can you... sing loudly when it's still blue?" -no. "Go to the toilet?" -yes. "get some paint from downstairs and paint your walls orange?" -noooo hahahaha.


Combining the serious stuff with a laugh is a great way to make sure your long boring rule-explaining session was understood :)

my 3 1/4 yr old is terrible for scooting off too far. Recently I've started trying the (obvious I know but hadn't tried before) tactic of 'you can go to that lampost, then stop' etc, making it into a game...she might jsut be young enough still for this to work? Seems to be more effective than just 'don't go too far! Stop!' etc.


I'm avoiding talking about specific dangers other than very immediate ones like cars, because I don't want him to start getting scared at night thinking about it etc. Tricky.

thank you everyone, some good ideas here.

belle funny you should post that. Yesterday my daughter rode off again - almost into the road in fact - and when I told her off she had huge huge meltdown tantrum. I happened to be with a friend and her son and she is a reception teacher. I was just inflaming the situation by getting mega cross and then my friend started that game you mention - can you ride to that yellow flower and stop - can you go to the lamp post and stop. It worked a treat - both at stopping tantrum and at keeping her in a reasonable distance. So that's a tactic I shall use from now on. Course it might not work for long but you can only work one day at a time can't you!


susypx

Yeah that "go to the next blue bin and stop" game will probably not last (and requires constant instructions from the parent). What I did that only needs reminding once a week now is "you may ride ahead but if you don't stop at the corners or stop when I shout stop you will lose the privilege and have to stay right next to me". (and then for the next two outings you keep her next to you).

I wouldn't explain 'stranger danger' to a 4 year old.


There are any number of reasons why a 4 year old should stay within sight, so I would concentrate on instilling the habit. 4 year olds have a weird (but fantastic) relationship with dramatic / scary stories like 'bad men' and aren't always very perturbed about the possibility of a horrible accident.


Just tell her that if she goes too far away, or into the road on her scooter she is not old enough to have one, and you will take it off her and make her walk holding your hand.


Then do it - the first and every time she scoots off.


Get her to get used to obeying the order to 'Stop'. Say 'we're practicing stopping when I say so' - and have a few practices. Then praise her and say she needs to stop, straight away if you shout 'stop'. If she doesn't you will know she isn't old enough to be out and about. Take the scooter and make her walk, hand held.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Reeves says she's in charge and no no's Rayners plan, what happens now?
    • So top of Lane. Local Sainsbury, middle Co Op and M and S and bottom Tesco Express…..now everyone should be happy except those that want a Waitrose as well…0h and  don’t forget M and S near ED Station….
    • Direct link to joint statement : https://thehaguegroup.org/meetings-bogota-en/?link_id=2&can_id=2d0a0048aad3d4915e3e761ac87ffe47&source=email-pi-briefing-no-26-the-bogota-breakthrough&email_referrer=email_2819587&email_subject=pi-briefing-no-26-the-bogot_-breakthrough&&   No. 26 | The Bogotá Breakthrough “The era of impunity is over.” That was the message from Bogotá, Colombia, where governments from across the Global South and beyond took the most ambitious coordinated action since Israel’s genocidal assault on Gaza began 21 months ago. Convened by The Hague Group and co-chaired by the governments of Colombia and South Africa, the Emergency Conference on Palestine brought together 30 states for two days of intensive deliberation — and emerged with a concrete, coordinated six-point plan to restrain Israel’s war machine and uphold international law. States took up the call from their host, Colombian President and Progressive International Council Member Gustavo Petro, who had urged them to be “protagonists together.” Twelve governments signed onto the measures immediately. The rest now have a deadline: 20 September 2025, on the eve of the United Nations General Assembly. The unprecedented six measures commit states to:     Prevent military and dual use exports to Israel.     Refuse Israeli weapons transfers at their ports.     Prevent vessels carrying weapons to Israel under their national flags.     Review all public contracts to prevent public institutions and funds from supporting Israel’s illegal occupation.     Pursue justice for international crimes.     Support universal jurisdiction to hold perpetrators accountable. “We came to Bogotá to make history — and we did,” said Colombian President Gustavo Petro. “Together, we have begun the work of ending the era of impunity. These measures show that we will no longer allow international law to be treated as optional, or Palestinian life as disposable.” The measures are not symbolic. They are grounded in binding obligations under international law — including the International Court of Justice’s July 2024 advisory opinion declaring Israel’s occupation unlawful, and September 2024’s UN General Assembly Resolution ES-10/24, which gave states a 12-month deadline to act. UN Special Rapporteur on the situation of human rights in the occupied Palestinian territory Francesca Albanese called them “a momentous step forward.” “The Hague Group was born to advance international law in an era of impunity,” said South Africa’s Foreign Minister, Ronald Lamola. “The measures adopted in Bogotá show that we are serious — and that coordinated state action is possible.” The response from Washington was swift — and revealing. In a threatening statement to journalists, a US State Department spokesperson accused The Hague Group of “seeking to isolate Israel” and warned that the US would “aggressively defend our interests, our military, and our allies, including Israel, from such coordinated legal and diplomatic” actions. But instead of deterring action, the threats have only clarified the stakes. In Bogotá, states did not flinch. They acted — and they invite the world to join them. The deadline for further states to take up the measures is now two months away. And with it, the pressure is mounting for governments across the world — from Brazil to Ireland, Chile to Spain — to match words with action. As Albanese said, “the clock is now ticking for states — from Europe to the Arab world and beyond — to join them.” This is not a moment to observe. It is a moment to act. Share the Joint Statement from Bogotá and popularise the six measures. Write to your elected representative and your government and demand they sign on before 20 September. History was made in Bogotá. Now, it’s up to all of us to ensure it becomes reality, that Palestinian life is not disposable and international law is not optional. The era of impunity is coming to an end. Palestine is not alone. In solidarity, The Progressive International Secretariat  
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...