Jump to content

Recommended Posts

I can see they had to send out a message. It doesn't say enough also whether the message was from the Police- and who would want their child going home on their own tonight? ! I Imagine their switchboard has gone 'ballistic' . Mine goes to After School club so in this case I am lucky. I guess all kids could go there until they are picked up. This is maybe one case when it would be good if kids had mobiles. Im anti them usually.

Text was as follows.


this morning a man tried to abduct a yr 6 child on his way to a local school. if you dont want your child to go home on their own please contact the school.


We know nothing else. Could be a kidnap attempt, estranged father or what we all probably assumed some kind of child abuser.

Please let's not speculate about a reported incident where we have no detail. What is an attempted "abduction"? That word conjures up violent images, but I wouldn't be surprised if the actual incident was nothing like that at all. Who reported the incident? Who witnessed it?


I'm not saying that the incident was acceptable, but as it stands the community might be getting whipped up into a panic when there is no way of knowing if there is anything for your own child to worry about or not.

According to the head at Heber, it wasn't a Heber child. It was a child on his way to Eliot Bank in Sydenham who was offered a lift by a man in a car, who used the bus strike as a reason for offering the lift. It happened on Sydenham Hill, and the boy refused the lift and reported the incident to the school.
In which case, I would say labelling it as an "Attempted Abduction" was unnecessary scaremongering (however dodgy the person offering the lift might have been). I would suggest that it is just as safe to let your Year 6 child walk to school in East Dulwich next Monday as it was yesterday, or ten years ago. In fact, it's probably safer. And remember children, if a stranger offers you a lift, always say no - just like my mother told me.
Alternatively: "This morning, a man offered a lift to a child on his way to school, as the buses were on strike. The child said no, which was very sensible as you should NEVER accept a lift from strangers. The incident took place in another part of south London." Put this way, I hardly think it was necessary to send texts to every parent of the school.
seems Heber cant do right for doing wrong - if they hadn't sent out the text having had the information and another incident occurred, folk would have been up in arms. As a receiver of the text myself it was very alarming and even if the details point to a 'lesser' incident, I'd rather have the text than not. Whatever the real details of the incident, the yound lad did exactly the right thing, refusing the lift and reporting it to his school - his school saw (rightly IMO) that they had a responsibility to share the information with other local schools (sydenham is very local, hardly 'another part of South London' which implies much further afield than SE26...).

Katy Tonbridge Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Alternatively: "This morning, a man offered a lift

> to a child on his way to school, as the buses were

> on strike. The child said no, which was very

> sensible as you should NEVER accept a lift from

> strangers. The incident took place in another

> part of south London." Put this way, I hardly

> think it was necessary to send texts to every

> parent of the school.


Katy T - your interpretation seems very sensible and balanced. I agree with you entirely.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • While it is good that GALA have withdrawn their application for a second weekend, local people and councillors will likely have the same fight on their hands for next year's event. In reading the consultation report, I noted the Council were putting the GALA event in the same light as all the other events that use the park, like the Circus, the Fair and even the FOPR fete. ALL of those events use the common, not the park, and cause nothing like the level of noise and/or disruption of the GALA event. Even the two day Irish Festival (for those that remember that one) was never as noisy as GALA. So there is some disingenuity and hypocrisy from the Council on this, something I wll point out in my response to the report. The other point to note was that in past years branches were cut back for the fencing. Last year the council promised no trees would be cut after pushback, but they seem to now be reverting to a position of 'only in agreement with the council's arbourist'. Is this more hypocrisy from 'green' Southwark who seem to once again be ok with defacing trees for a fence that is up for just days? The people who now own GALA don't live in this area. GALA as an event began in Brockwell Park. It then lost its place there to bigger events (that pesumably could pay Lambeth Council more). One of the then company directors lived on the Rye Hill Estate next to the park and that is likely how Peckham Rye came to be the new choice for the event. That person is no longer involved. Today's GALA company is not the same as the 'We Are the Fair' company that held that first event, not the same in scope, aim or culture. And therein lies the problem. It's not a local community led enterprise, but a commercial one, underwritten by a venture capital company. The same company co-run the Rally Event each year in Southwark Park, which btw is licensed as a one day event only. That does seem to be truer to the original 'We Are the Fair' vision, but how much of that is down to GALA as opoosed to 'Bird on the Wire' (the other group organising it) is hard to say.  For local people, it's three days of not being able to open windows, As someone said above, if a resident set up a PA in their back garden and subjected the neighbours to 10 hours of hard dance music every day for three days, the Council would take action. Do not underestimate how distressing that is for many local residents, many of whom are elderly, frail, young, vulnerable. They deserve more respect than is being shown by those who think it's no big deal. And just to be clear, GALA and the council do not consider there to be a breach of db level if the level is corrected within 15 minutes of the breach. In other words, while db levels are set as part of the noise management plan, there is an acknowledgement that a breach is ok if corrected within 15 minutes. That is just not good enough. Local councillors objected to the proposed extension. 75% of those that responded to the consultation locally did not want GALA 26 to take place at all. For me personally, any goodwill that had been built up through the various consultations over recent years was erased with that application for a second weekend, and especially given that when asked if there were plans for that in post 2025 event feedback meetings (following rumours), GALA lied and said there were no plans to expand. I have come to the conclusion that all the effort to appease on some things is merely an exercise in show, to get past the council's threshold for the events licence. They couldn't give a hoot in reality for local people, and people that genuinely care about parkland, don't litter it with noisy festivals either.   
    • Aria is my go to plumber. Fixed a toilet leak for me at short notice. Reasonably priced and very professional. 
    • Anyone has a storage or a display rack for Albums LPs drop me a message thanks
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...