Jump to content

Recommended Posts

There seems to be a new trend in the upper parts of illuminating new developments at night. One of our neighbours rear elevation looks like a 1973 Genesis set with blue lights illuminating their garden evein in the early hours.


It appears to be self indulgent nonsense but maybe not an issue for local council/neighbourhood police etc.


You could of cause argue that it is not doing any harm, but I think it spoils the area. The relationship is not good so not one I was going to sort out through direct dialogue.


Perhaps you are the person illuminating South London so may wish to give your opinion.


Serious suggestions please. I have considered fighting back with a laser, spot lighting, illuminated signs etc but that is all a bit silly.

Every time I look out of the rear windows, or go into my back gardens all I can see is blue light, as well as visual it feels imposing and over lookee. What I did not explain is these properties tower over the rest of the area being on high ground.


I find it strange that the owners are quite happy to illuminate their own land, yet not bothered that a dozen other properties have this vista.



So judging by your response giggirl I should in deed get a bank of lasers and retaliate! I will be implementing my own free right to do similar!

Malumbu, it's tricky to know what to suggest if you already have a difficult relationship with the neighbour. Is there anything you can do to improve the relationship - offer to help them with something, ask them around for a drink - so that a friendly chat becomes possible and they have enough of a sense of obligation to at least consider your point of view? They may not be aware that it's bothering other people and perhaps you could come to an amicable agreement that they switch it off at 11pm?

malumbu Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------


> So judging by your response giggirl I should in

> deed get a bank of lasers and retaliate! I will

> be implementing my own free right to do similar!


Where on earth are you getting that from? That's a huge leap to make. What I posted is that I don't understand your problem. I didn't pass judgement; I didn't say get a life - I merely said that I don't understand. If I saw it for myself I might think it was horrendous, but all we've got to go on is what you posted.


I doubt there is anything you can do about it. You might want to try and repair your relationship with your neighbours because it doesn't help to fall out with people who you have to live in close proximity with. They aren't doing anything wrong, they're just doing something you don't like. So perhaps build some bridges and open a dialogue.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • These have reduced over the years, are "perfect" lives Round Robins being replaced by "perfect" lives Instagram posts where we see all year round how people portray their perfect lives ?    The point of this thread is that for the last few years, due to issues at the mail offices, we had delays to post over Christmas. Not really been flagged as an issue this year but I am still betting on the odd card, posted well before Christmas, arriving late January. 
    • Two subjects here.  Xmas cards,  We receive and send less of them.  One reason is that the cost of postage - although interestingly not as much as I thought say compared to 10 years ago (a little more than inflation).  Fun fact when inflation was double digits in the 70s cost of postage almost doubled in one year.  Postage is not a good indication of general inflation fluctuating a fair bit.  The huge rise in international postage that for a 20g Christmas card to Europe (no longer a 20g price, now have to do up to 100g), or a cheapskate 10g card to the 'States (again have to go up to the 100g price) , both around a quid in 2015, and now has more than doubled in real terms.  Cards exchanged with the US last year were arriving in the New Year.  Funnily enough they came much quicker this year.  So all my cards abroad were by email this year. The other reason we send less cards is that it was once a good opportunity to keep in touch with news.  I still personalise many cards with a news and for some a letter, and am a bit grumpy when I get a single line back,  Or worse a round robin about their perfect lives and families.  But most of us now communicate I expect primarily by WhatApp, email, FB etc.  No need for lightweight airmail envelope and paper in one.    The other subject is the mail as a whole. Privitisation appears to have done it no favours and the opening up of competition with restrictions on competing for parcel post with the new entrants.  Clearly unless you do special delivery there is a good chance that first class will not be delivered in a day as was expected in the past.   Should we have kept a public owned service subsidised by the tax payer?  You could also question how much lead on innovation was lost following the hiving off of the national telecommunications and mail network.
    • Why have I got a feeling there was also a connection with the beehive in Brixton on that road next to the gym
    • Ah, thanks,  it all comes flooding back. I've actually been to the Hastings shop, I'd forgotten all about it, along with her name! Didn't she (in between?)  take over what  was then The Magnolia, previously The Magdala, now The Lordship, with her then partner? Or is that some figment of my imagination?  In fact, didn't they transform it from The Magdala (much missed) to The Magnolia? With flowery wallpaper covering the front of the bar? Which reminds me of the pub's brief period after The Magnolia  as the ill-conceived and ill-fated The Patch.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...