Jump to content

Who to vote for?


Bob Buzzard

Recommended Posts

carlafindle Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Hemingway Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > You can always get the gardener in to

> thoroughly

> > inspect her front garden again Bob

>

>

> Not forgetting the back passage.


Oh, yes, down the side return too - does anyone have a number for a gardener? I did some trimming in the front garden yesterday with Mrs Bob.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

diable rouge Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Would this be the same Dominic Raab who didn't

> quite understand how reliant UK trade is on the

> Dover-Calais crossing?...


Yes that?s him, the one and the same. Still 20 years in the foreign office probably meant that it took a little while to figure out the complexities and nuances of trading goods across the water from foreigners lands.


Like how the heck are you meant to know these details, if not by working in the Foreign Office. That said, Whitehall is quite a long way from Dover, I?ve read Samuel Pepys diary and it took him days to get there tbh.


So please, let?s cut Dom some slack here.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 4 weeks later...

keano77 Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> diable rouge Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > Nicola Sturgeon...So, given the verdict of the

> > people of Scotland last night, the Scottish

> > Government will next week publish the detailed

> > democratic case for a transfer of power to

> enable

> > a referendum to be put beyond legal challenge.

> > That didn't take long...

>

> It will be interesting watching what happens in

> Scotland.

>

> Alex Salmond?s court case in January could do a

> lot of harm to the SNP and partly explains

> Sturgeon?s haste.

>

> More interesting perhaps is a point made by Andrew

> Marr this morning. If, or when, Boris agrees to an

> Independence vote for Scotland the U.K. will

> probably have left the EU. Scotland would then be

> faced with voting to leave the U.K. while also

> being outside the EU.

>

> Squeaky bum time.


Oh oh, Derek Mackay has now had to resign and Alex Salmond will soon be in court. Peak SNP? All downhill now?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

keano77 Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> keano77 Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > diable rouge Wrote:

> >

> --------------------------------------------------

>

> > -----

> > > Nicola Sturgeon...So, given the verdict of

> the

> > > people of Scotland last night, the Scottish

> > > Government will next week publish the

> detailed

> > > democratic case for a transfer of power to

> > enable

> > > a referendum to be put beyond legal

> challenge.

> > > That didn't take long...

> >

> > It will be interesting watching what happens in

> > Scotland.

> >

> > Alex Salmond?s court case in January could do a

> > lot of harm to the SNP and partly explains

> > Sturgeon?s haste.

> >

> > More interesting perhaps is a point made by

> Andrew

> > Marr this morning. If, or when, Boris agrees to

> an

> > Independence vote for Scotland the U.K. will

> > probably have left the EU. Scotland would then

> be

> > faced with voting to leave the U.K. while also

> > being outside the EU.

> >

> > Squeaky bum time.

>

> Oh oh, Derek Mackay has now had to resign and Alex

> Salmond will soon be in court. Peak SNP? All

> downhill now?


An independent Scotland would not be run by the SNP just like UK post Brexit is not run by UKIP.


I'd expect independent Labour and Tory parties of Scotland.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

For context - I didn't vote conservative recently, despite my leaver credentials on this forum. For me the question of government or leave are totally separate.


But, in anycase, after the election I was prepared to give Boris the benefit of the doubt, despite his patchy record with the truth etc. But I must say this forcing out of javid does concern me.


They wanted him to change his advisors, so really they wanted to keep him as a figurehead to show stability, but number 10 would actually make the decisions in the chancellory...


Hmmmm.......

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Ha ha, some people really don't like an opinion that differs to theirs do they! Bravo One Dulwich - you're magnificently rattling the cages of people who don't want to hear a differing opinion and the fact they get so irate about it is the icing on the cake! Some spend so much emotional energy trying to convince themselves One Dulwich is some shadowy, agitator state-funded lobby group when all they are is a group of local residents giving a voice to the majority of residents impacted by the measures.
    • @Earl, Be assured, it is purely a local group. In fact it is a genteel group of Dulwich area residents, mostly ladies , who are a little  reluctant to publish their individual names as they do not wish to be targets for hostility from internet trolls. Local residents who attended the anti-LTN gatherings in Dulwich would have easily recognised the active members of the group. Should you have any queries about funding, it is quite easy to send them an email.
    • Hi  I have a spare old wheelbarrow that you could have for free. You’d need to come and collect it from Telegraph Hill, so drop me a message if you’re still looking and we can arrange a time best wishes carrie
    • This is quite a serious allegation. What evidence is there of this? Pressured how and by whom? This is quite a spin on ‘it’s been agreed with the emergency services’. They think the vehicles pictured driving through with partially covered plates are the result of ‘poor signage’ 🤔  If it is as they say ‘small numbers’ driving through the square, that doesn’t suggest that the signage is unclear. I mean who honestly believes it’s possible to drive through there without noticing the signs / planters (assuming you’re driving with due care and attention)?! 🤨  Also, haven’t ‘One’ opposed any improvements to the layout / landscaping and signage proposed by Southwark? It’s all a bit desperate. At the height of the LTN ‘controversy’ a number of co-ordinated ‘One’ groups popped up across London. It doesn’t feel like a local grassroots movement, but has all the hallmarks of astroturfing. The lack of transparency about it’s funding / sponsorship and structure does not help with this impression. 
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...