Jump to content

Recommended Posts

954m was the first round of offers and others have said that at a recent open day the head said that after the shakedown and people declining places etc, by the time term started the furthest place was about 1500m.

There are currently 6 forms in a year but that is supposed to increase to 8 form entry in a couple of years. Theoretically this should extend the catchment but by then lots of sibling places will come into play so it may make little difference in actuality. Hope this helps a bit xx

Are you sure they said 1500m? That would be a massive increase from offers day. At the open day we went to the headteacher said that only about a dozen families get a place between initial offers and start of term. I can?t remember what he said the distance increased to, but it was only by a few metres.
Renata Could you please help us clarify? Whatever that involves? As the previous threads have mentioned this information seems impossible to clarify. We?re trying to guess on hearsay whether the final distance after the first round only increased from 954m by a few metres or to a much more significant 1500. It really is ludicrous that we?re still going round and round in circles about this information. Frustrating doesn?t cover it. Thank you
Agree, HelloSailor. It?s impossible to get any reliable information. In addition, banding tests are happening very soon and I?ve still not got my dates. I presume schools expect us to drop everything at once for them. It?s high time these bloody schools got taken down a peg or two.
We need clarity and transparency. It?s nuts that lots of local parents are trying to decide whether to make huge decisions like pushing themselves to the financial limit to move house a few roads away and pay stamp duty that will cripple them based on hearsay, gossip and speculation. ?Well fingers crossed because my friend?s neighbour?s daughter got in from Friern Road?....?ah no but I know someone who knows someone who said their place was because they have a statement?...it?s just....madness. We all know that the data from previous years in no way guarantees what will happen in the year we apply but to not even be able to pin down info like whether the final offered distance was not much more than 950 or 1500 after the shakedown is just ludicrous. Please Renata or someone, anyone, properly help with this situation. No more ?the schools don?t publish this information? mantras, just the facts, please?? We can?t know for sure whether our kids will be offered a place even with the data but it is definitely hugely more helpful than desperately casting around for local hearsay. We?re not trying to get our children into Hogwarts here, just trying to work out if they have a realistic chance of being offered ANY local school but even that feels like pulling teeth.

Hello all.

The Council doesn't have the information. All Southwark Secondaries have their own admissions policies and rank all their applicants according to their criteria. What Southwark does is the number crunching, which of the schools a child applies to is the highest ranked one of their CAF that they fulfill the admissions criteria for.


I have spoken directly with the person who deals with admissions at Charter ED. You are all pretty much correct but for different years! In 2018 the last place offered on distance on offer day was around a km. There was a lot of movement on the waiting list that year and by the start of term it had moved to more than 1.3km. In 2019 the last place offered was at 954m from the school. There was little movement on the waiting list so the places that came up went to children who had moved into the area after 31st October 2018 and lived closer than 954 or had secured a place under other criteria eg an older sibling got a place at the school or they were a previously looked after child or under SEN. The last place offered at the start of the school year in 2019 was approximately 1km, so significantly less than 2018. Something that could inpact this year is that there could be a increase in sibling numbers as the firat intake are currently in year 9 and a 2-3 year gap between siblings is common. The situation will change again in entry for 22 or 23 as the school plans to expand by 2FE then.


There are no catchment areas for Southwark schools, so last place distances can vary quite significantly from year to year.

Renata

The whole system is too complicated and frankly, then more complicated it is the more it tends to advantage those with the resources to navigate that complexity. Why not just have a simple system of kids going to their closest / neighbourhood school and then put all that wasted time and energy into making each school the best it can possibly be?

rahrahrah Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> The whole system is too complicated and frankly,

> then more complicated it is the more it tends to

> advantage those with the resources to navigate

> that complexity. Why not just have a simple system

> of kids going to their closest / neighbourhood

> school and then put all that wasted time and

> energy into making each school the best it can

> possibly be?



Yay - this!!!!! Such a waste of time/money/energy.

People with resources to move closer to a preferred school simply chucks some other poor sod's child out of the school's intake. Make it local and make it good!


HP

hpsaucey Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> rahrahrah Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > The whole system is too complicated and

> frankly,

> > then more complicated it is the more it tends

> to

> > advantage those with the resources to navigate

> > that complexity. Why not just have a simple

> system

> > of kids going to their closest / neighbourhood

> > school and then put all that wasted time and

> > energy into making each school the best it can

> > possibly be?

>

>

> Yay - this!!!!! Such a waste of time/money/energy.

>

> People with resources to move closer to a

> preferred school simply chucks some other poor

> sod's child out of the school's intake. Make it

> local and make it good!

>

> HP


how does 'making it local' deal with the issue of people moving close to a school in order to get in? surely it does the opposite?


(bearing in mind that schools don't/can't have infinite capacity)

pk Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> hpsaucey Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > rahrahrah Wrote:

> >

> --------------------------------------------------

>

> > -----

> > > The whole system is too complicated and

> > frankly,

> > > then more complicated it is the more it tends

> > to

> > > advantage those with the resources to

> navigate

> > > that complexity. Why not just have a simple

> > system

> > > of kids going to their closest /

> neighbourhood

> > > school and then put all that wasted time and

> > > energy into making each school the best it

> can

> > > possibly be?

> >

> >

> > Yay - this!!!!! Such a waste of

> time/money/energy.

> >

> > People with resources to move closer to a

> > preferred school simply chucks some other poor

> > sod's child out of the school's intake. Make it

> > local and make it good!

> >

> > HP

>

> how does 'making it local' deal with the issue of

> people moving close to a school in order to get

> in? surely it does the opposite?

>

> (bearing in mind that schools don't/can't have

> infinite capacity)


Erm - you make them all good, (the best they can be as rahrahrarh said). Then you minimise the need for people to move for school purposes only. Scrap faith schools and ditto single sex and private. Go to your local co-ed school!

hpsaucey Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> pk Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > hpsaucey Wrote:

> >

> --------------------------------------------------

>

> > -----

> > > rahrahrah Wrote:

> > >

> >

> --------------------------------------------------

>

> >

> > > -----

> > > > The whole system is too complicated and

> > > frankly,

> > > > then more complicated it is the more it

> tends

> > > to

> > > > advantage those with the resources to

> > navigate

> > > > that complexity. Why not just have a simple

> > > system

> > > > of kids going to their closest /

> > neighbourhood

> > > > school and then put all that wasted time

> and

> > > > energy into making each school the best it

> > can

> > > > possibly be?

> > >

> > >

> > > Yay - this!!!!! Such a waste of

> > time/money/energy.

> > >

> > > People with resources to move closer to a

> > > preferred school simply chucks some other

> poor

> > > sod's child out of the school's intake. Make

> it

> > > local and make it good!

> > >

> > > HP

> >

> > how does 'making it local' deal with the issue

> of

> > people moving close to a school in order to get

> > in? surely it does the opposite?

> >

> > (bearing in mind that schools don't/can't have

> > infinite capacity)

>

> Erm - you make them all good, (the best they can

> be as rahrahrarh said). Then you minimise the need

> for people to move for school purposes only.

> Scrap faith schools and ditto single sex and

> private. Go to your local co-ed school!



that's a bit oversimplistic/naive tho isn't it?

pk Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> hpsaucey Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > pk Wrote:

> >

> --------------------------------------------------

>

> > -----

> > > hpsaucey Wrote:

> > >

> >

> --------------------------------------------------

>

> >

> > > -----

> > > > rahrahrah Wrote:

> > > >

> > >

> >

> --------------------------------------------------

>

> >

> > >

> > > > -----

> > > > > The whole system is too complicated and

> > > > frankly,

> > > > > then more complicated it is the more it

> > tends

> > > > to

> > > > > advantage those with the resources to

> > > navigate

> > > > > that complexity. Why not just have a

> simple

> > > > system

> > > > > of kids going to their closest /

> > > neighbourhood

> > > > > school and then put all that wasted time

> > and

> > > > > energy into making each school the best

> it

> > > can

> > > > > possibly be?

> > > >

> > > >

> > > > Yay - this!!!!! Such a waste of

> > > time/money/energy.

> > > >

> > > > People with resources to move closer to a

> > > > preferred school simply chucks some other

> > poor

> > > > sod's child out of the school's intake.

> Make

> > it

> > > > local and make it good!

> > > >

> > > > HP

> > >

> > > how does 'making it local' deal with the

> issue

> > of

> > > people moving close to a school in order to

> get

> > > in? surely it does the opposite?

> > >

> > > (bearing in mind that schools don't/can't

> have

> > > infinite capacity)

> >

> > Erm - you make them all good, (the best they

> can

> > be as rahrahrarh said). Then you minimise the

> need

> > for people to move for school purposes only.

> > Scrap faith schools and ditto single sex and

> > private. Go to your local co-ed school!

>

>

> that's a bit oversimplistic/naive tho isn't it?


Nope = just ambitious and non-cynical. We can all dream...

Pretty much how it worked where I went to school give or take. No faith schools; very few single sex and none near by. Ditto private schools. So you went to your local school end of.

pk Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I don't remember all schools being equal and all

> schools being good ever

>

> because they weren't and never will be (not least

> 'cause not all parents/pupils would define 'good'

> in the same way, and neither should they)


Of course not, and of course people have varying definitions of good; especially so for schools when, as is the case now, so much is expected of them that they could not possibly be 'good' at everything. But as rahrahrah says, the simpler the better.

I think this is a rather problematic attitude because this assumes that all children require the exact same education wherever they live, whatever their parents' aspirations, whatever their inclinations, dispositions or backgrounds happen to be. All children are not the same and nor they should they be treated as such. Some arrive with great disadvantage, some with particular ability, some with disability and so on and so on. The kinds of innovation that some Free Schools have been able to bring in over recent years have absolutely blown my mind - keeping the individual child at the centre and customising their education according to need and yielding brilliant results.


Education should be as nimble, flexible and varied as the children it's offered to. The current arrangements, at least in ambition, recognise this fact.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • on a practical level found here these have very positive feedback:   Danny - 07943 673482 joeast 12/09/23 Just had my roof replaced by Danny (mobile 07943 673482) who I would highly recommend. He is honest, clean, reliable and explained the work and sent photos as the work progressed. His initial estimate for costs was detailed and close to the actual price of the job. jamondo 07/12/24 Another recommendation for Danny here!  After carrying out extensive work on our property in 2018, we have constantly had problems  with the newly built roof.  Then followed numerous fixes and bodges by the builders then by other so called 'experts' and professionals' charging extortionate amounts and / or giving guarantees that amounted to nothing.  Lots of 'it could be this and that etc...'  Sadly our tale of woe is not uncommon. After getting a number of people to look at the roof - the consensus was that the whole roof needed redoing (it was clear that by now the roof looked a mess with multiple things done wrong or poorly).  We obtained quotes and decided to go with Danny - his was the most competitive but it was not overriding factor behind why we did.  Danny made clear what the quote covered and where there might be extra work required as he got to it (this was fairly minor). He was easy to get a hold of and responded promptly and he was also happy to offer up refences which I did contact and all were happy to vouch for him. Minor downside was that we had a bit of a wait, but it was worth it.  When work started I was kept updated with progress and photos.  Issues were dealt with, and although I'm not an expert by any means the appearance of the work was top.  Most importantly we are leak free! bonzo 17/05/25 Needed a new rear roof for terrace house in East Dulwich and heard about Danny Denton (07943 673482). Have worked with over 20 builders in the past but this guy was way the best - polite, hard working, honest, professional, informative, highly skilled and above all quoted lower than any of the others who came down to view the job. If you need roofing work I would definitely give him a call. If he's busy working else where I assure you he is well worth waiting for. He got the scaffold up and job finished in no time and kept me informed at every stage. Another roofer (who appears on this forum) gave a quote which was three times higher than Danny's.   #########################################################   Norwood Roofing 07412 000 214 Email Address: [email protected] Website: https://norwoodroofing.co.uk/ Fee163 01/01/26 Another 5 star recommendation for David and Patrick. Got in touch with David last week regarding clearing our gutters and as always he quoted immediately and came out within the week to do the job.  We've used David and Patrick for all our roof work for almost 10 years .   They also did an amazing job for my sister who is based outside the area - she couldn't easily find someone local and they stepped in and did a fantastic job (it was quite a big job).  Can't recommend them highly enough, really personable, always reliable and so easy to work with and consistent, just wouldn't work with anyone one else!  Thanks again David and Patrick. caroline5553 12/01/26 Another recommendation for David and Patrick. David came out the same day we called, had scaffolding up by the weekend and the job done on Monday. Really nice guys, never made me feel uncomfortable, easy to work with and seemed to have done a great job. Thanks, David and Patrick! sheppick 15/12/25 I would also recommend David and Patrick. David quoted immediately, and they came and did the work I needed the following week. They fixed my leaking roof and did a number of other jobs for me that were needed on the roof. Really reliable, turned up on time and very reasonable quote. Super easy to deal with and I would highly recommend.  #################################################################   Which Trusted Trader R Tredget & Son 07905829393 or 07956553852  [email protected] http://www.rtredgetandson.com/ OUR FEATURED WORKS Roofing, plumbing, kitchen installation, building, interior decorating, electrical installation, bathroom installation, exterior decorating, tiling, plastering, landscaping & carpentry 02/08/25 This is the second time R. Tredget & Son have carried out works on our property. Part of the work included the repair of cladding on an end gable that Richard had previously installed but it had since been accidentally damaged by another trades-person. I assumed I'd pay for such repair work, as the damage was no fault of his own, but when we discussed this, Richard was adamant he would not charge! Made a lovely job of the repair too. When you turn your home (or part of it) over to builders it often feels like they've taken over. Not so with Richard, Adam and Harrison. They respect your property and are willing to work with you. They keep you informed at every stage, offering suggestions and alternatives as appropriate and they don't take liberties. We are so glad to have found R. Tredget & Son builders: quality work from reliable, hard-working and courteous folks. 10/10/24 Multiple jobs complete to a high standard We've used Richard for a few years now getting our house complete. He and his team have completely refitted our kitchen, replaced ceilings, built internal and external walls, laid flooring, plastered, decorated, fixed guttering, fit skirting boards; the list goes on! They take pride in their work, and every job we've needed doing, they've always done to a high standard. No job was too big or too small for them, and I've no doubt the quality work they've done has increased the value of our house, so a big thanks again for everything they've done. 17/04/24 A Great Family Run Company This was our first time having works done in a new house so we were understandably nervous! From the first meeting with Richard and Adam we knew that we would be in good hands. Nothing that we wanted done was too much of an issue, even if it was a bit more of a challenge to them (unlike some other quotes we got!). They gave clever suggestions but weren't pushy with it and had good ideas! We had a whole new bathroom installed and then some structural work done around the house. The guys always made sure that they left the house in a clean state at the end of every day, which really made a difference to our standard of living during the works. Richard, Michelle, Adam, and H were trustworthy and communication was perfect throughout. We used some of their guys for boiler/electrics too and they were also great. Would highly recommend taking them on for your works!       
    • Bit of a long-shot, but I dropped my glasses somewhere along my run last night, after taking them off due to the rain. The glasses are Giorgio Armani with grey frames. My running route attached, so they could be anywhere along this route. If you've found them, please get in touch! 07971806292 Many thanks James
    • I'm in the middle of the civil service pension crisis with no pension for 4 months and counting. No access to the much publicised loans either. I have emailed Helen Hayes several times. It took her 6 weeks to contact Capita on my behalf but no follow up, no reply, she didn't attend the Westminster Hall debate about the issue either. Lots of other MPs are speaking and acting on behalf of their constituents but I've had no joy. Has anyone else please? What works to get help from Helen Hayes?
    • Our cat Suki has gone missing from Keston Road near Goose Green. Please let us know if you see her anywhere or can check your sheds and gardens. You can contact us me on 07980308743 or [email protected].  Thanks Chris
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...