Jump to content

Cross passenger on the 0703hrs train from East Dulwich to London Bridge (Lounged)


Recommended Posts

I've already err... robustly defended myself on the betting shop thread against Quids just now, so am wary of wading in again


My eyebrow did raise when the original poster used the word chav so casually but we'll come back to that


The reason I don't think calling someone chav is the same as black, is because when people discriminate against black people it's because of the colour of their skin - ie how they were born


Chav and working-class are not interchangeable terms. When I was growing up (poor, working/unemployed dolescounging class) I took inspiration from Orwell when he said there was no finer human than one who did an honest days work and came home and used his spare time to read and improve his mind (I paraphrase but you get the gist)


Many working-class families do just that. Chav as a term tends to be used when referring to general uncouth/disrepectful to others/meanspirited public behaviour. That the people who exhibit this behaviour wear a certain uniform sometimes is self-evident. What isn't evident is that is always working-class people who do this. I know of many a middle-class chav


So to call someone a chav in my book is nothing like referring to black people in the same way - it's labelling someones behaviour. The guy on the train SOUNDS like a gobshite at least doesn't he?

oooh look you see - he posted same time as me and made exactly the same point


except he spoiled it with the French thing - I will never understand this "thing" between the French and the English

didn't think the original post was asking for help so much as letting off steam..? seems what galled about the chav thing was the implication that somehow by being a chav, the potty mouth was more likely to attack than a nice jumper-wearing White Stuffer..?


is it not a simple case of something needing to be said(though perhaps not "chav"? or am I naive because I'm a woman and less likely to be assaulted under such circumstances?

Sean - Your class is not something you can always pretend not to be, or leave behind, and why the f%*k should you have to in order to be taken seriously or given the respect you deserve?


I know working class social climbers who sound stupid trying to pretend they are something they are not and middle-class slummers who run back to mummy at the first sign of real trouble.


The class divide in this country is as strong as it ever was and the love of money (not you ????) and financial status as the measure of success make the middle classes feel entitled to look down on the white trash and chavs that spoil their otherwise 'perfect' life.

Sorry Chav - can't agree with you on most of that


If people want to worry so much about what others think then let them - but yet again, that has nothing to do with class


there isn't as many people as you think who are middle-class and spend their time "looking down on" the working class - just because there some that DO shouldn't allow you to generalise in exactly the same way to complain about how working-class get generalised


and where does "spoil their otherwise 'perfect' life." come from? Anyone think they have a perfect life? Anyone at all?


Everytime this debate comes up it amounts to the same thing. There are some people who like to look out for others and take an interest in what goes on around them and there are others who are, to use an Irish expression, "m? f?iners" - ie out for themselves. TO constantly bring class in to the debate makes the whole thing tribal which isn't going to solve any problems

Sean - you moved away from your home country and any of the subtle class markers you may have had in Ireland would not be the same here so you are more able to be classless.


When I have lived in Canada, Belgium or France the same happened to me, my class markers were different to the class markers they recognised and although they still have class hierarchies, I seemed classless because many of mine where not the ones they understood.


Coming back to the UK was depressing because after being respected as generic English, having the class hierarchy imposed on me again by others and having to try to prove that what I say is more important than how I say it became an uphill battle again.

I overheard an argument today where a white woman called another white woman "white trash"! Erm... How the hell does that one figure in the intelligence ranks!! Especially as the woman (term used very loosely) was not black! It would have been perhaps slightly better if she'd called her "trailer trash" but then again we don't have trailers in London, just caravans whereby she probably would have called her a gypo! Confusing and I could'nt help loudly saying to the woman in question "wot a tw@t!" as I walked pass them! Getting all too Americanised if you ask me! And fogive me if I'm wrong, isn't "white trash" another term for "Chav"?

If someobody regularly gets on a train swearing and shouting at anyone who gets in their way, they are a fair subject for criticism, whether they are chavs, Hooray Henrys, yummy mummies, or wha'ever. For what it's worth, some of the rudest people that I have encountered on public transport are those whom I would categorise as soi-disant 'born to rule'. On the other hand, a number of v. rude people have come from a social category that is not so elevated (iron.)


Rudeness is rudeness, whoever the person is.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • In what way? Maybe it just felt more intelligent and considered coming directly after Question Time, which was a barely watchable bun fight.
    • Yes, all this. Totally Sephiroth. The electorate wants to see transformation overnight. That's not possible. But what is possible is leading with the right comms strategy, which isn't cutting through. As I've said before, messaging matters more now than policy, that's the only way to bring the electorate with you. And I worry that that's how Reform's going to get into power.  And the media LOVES Reform. 
    • “There was an excellent discussion on Newscast last night between the BBC Political Editor, the director of the IFS and the director of More In Common - all highly intelligent people with no party political agenda ” I would call this “generous”   Labour should never have made that tax promise because, as with - duh - Brexit, it’s pretending the real world doesn’t exist now. I blame Labour in no small part for this delusion. But the electorate need to cop on as well.  They think they can have everything they want without responsibilities, costs or attachments. The media encourage this  Labour do need to raise taxes. The country needs it.  Now, exactly how it’s done remains to be seen. But if people are just going to go around going “la la laffer curve. Liars! String em up! Vote someone else” then they just aren’t serious people reckoning with the problem yes Labour are more than a year into their term, but after 14 years of what the Tories  did? Whoever takes over, has a major problem 
    • Messaging, messaging, messaging. That's all it boils down to. There are only so many fiscal policies out there, and they're there for the taking, no matter which party you're in. I hate to say it, but Farage gets it right every time. Even when Reform reneges on fiscal policy, it does it with enough confidence and candidness that no one is wringing their hands. Instead, they're quietly admired for their pragmatism. Strangely, it's exactly the same as Labour has done, with its manifesto reverse on income tax, but it's going to bomb.  Blaming the Tories / Brexit / Covid / Putin ... none of it washes with the public anymore  - it wants to be sold a vision of the future, not reminded of the disasters of the past. Labour put itself on the back foot with its 'the tories fucked it all up' stance right at the beginning of its tenure.  All Lammy had to do (as with Reeves and Raynor etc) was say 'mea culpa. We've made a mistake, we'll fix it. Sorry guys, we're on it'. But instead it's 'nothing to see here / it's someone else's fault / I was buying a suit / hadn't been briefed yet'.  And, of course, the press smells blood, which never helps.  Oh! And Reeve's speech on Wednesday was so drab and predictable that even the journalists at the press conference couldn't really be arsed to come up with any challenging questions. 
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...