Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Yeah Silk road for Xinjiang style food. (not sure if it's Uyghur-specific or not, as they do have pork on the menu, but it seems geographically correct).


Wulli Wulli is OK, the Szechuan section is small but it's not bad at all. The rest of the Anglo-Cantonese type menu is fine, for that type of food.


Hong Kong City dim sum is not bad at all, if you've ever had dim sum in Chinatown then it is basically the same thing. I think in the evening they do fixed-priced all-you-can-eat menus, but I've never tried it... it might be fine, I have no idea.. lots of onions, one imagines.


Wagamama is not really Chinese... it's more sort of Japanese-ish with a handful of pan-Asian type dishes. I don't even think they have any branches in south London. FWIW I think it's nothing special, but it is consistent... if you find yourself in a shopping mall or a random high street, it's a pretty safe bet. They deserve credit for bringing katsu curry to the masses, although it should really be pork...

^I don't like Wagamama either


Dragon Castle on top end of Walworth Road was also ok for Dim Sum although haven't been there for ages.


Are there many great Chinese places though outside of central London? IME they all tend to be generically bland and aimed at British palates.

Some good vietnamese places here and there though

RyeRambler Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Don't overlook 148 on Lordship Lane. Ive only been

> twice but thought the food was excellent and good

> value. In town i think Phoenix Palace baker street

> has the best food. Hakkasan also has good food but

> place is a bit wanky



Where is 148 on Lordship Lane?


Wuli Wuli is OK.


Not keen on Wagamama (though as said above it isn't Chinese). I think it's gone way downhill since its early days ( but I haven't been there for years, so maybe it has gone uphill again!

DulwichFox Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> 148 Chinese is the old Mr liu restaurant.


I?ve been a few times. There?s some fresh veg dishes done well here. I like the crispy seafood noodles.


It?s run by a guy who used to work in Won Kei in China Town and the food is quite similar.

148 Chinese


148 Lordship Ln, London SE22 8HB

Hours:

Thursday 5:30?10:30pm

Friday 5:30?11pm

Saturday 12?2:30pm, 5:30?11pm

Sunday 12?2:30pm, 5:30?10pm

Monday Closed

Tuesday 5:30?10:30pm

Wednesday 5:30?10:30pm


Phone: 020 8693 8266




I used to use Mr Liu (which stayed open late) because of its proximity to my house.

Food would still be hot when I got home. They were really friendly.


148 Chinese closes early. 10.30 on week days.

You need to get there earlier to place any order for Take Away


Too early if you have been to the Pub and want a late Chinese meal.


Eta:

Did try it once. The food was poor. not as good as Mr Liu was previously.

Satellite Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> "work in Won Kei in China Town and the food is

> quite similar."

>

> Cheap and full of MSG then?



Never had an msg issue with either. That?s a bit of a perpetual myth around such food. I?m not saying it?s never used, but ?full of? along with ?cheap? has a certain dismissive ring to it, no?


The WonKei reference is more towards a Hong Kong style of Chinese restaurant.


And like any restaurant, if you don?t want a certain ingredient, like MSG, just tell them. But I like 148, they try hard and make some nice dishes. Their Char Sui is home made on the premises.

Beulah Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Dragon Castle on top end of Walworth Road was also

> ok for Dim Sum although haven't been there for

> ages


Yeah. I've not been for ages either... TBH mainly because we find Hong Kong City easier to get to. But it used to be quite good. I believe they actually had a dim sum chef making many of the items himself (usually dim sum is bought in), but not sure if it's still the case or not.


If you want dim sum that's a bit fancy... A Wong in Victoria is quite something..

Seabag Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Satellite Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > "work in Won Kei in China Town and the food is

> > quite similar."

> >

> > Cheap and full of MSG then?

>

>

> Never had an msg issue with either. That?s a bit

> of a perpetual myth around such food. I?m not

> saying it?s never used, but ?full of? along with

> ?cheap? has a certain dismissive ring to it, no?

>

> The WonKei reference is more towards a Hong Kong

> style of Chinese restaurant.

>

> And like any restaurant, if you don?t want a

> certain ingredient, like MSG, just tell them. But

> I like 148, they try hard and make some nice

> dishes. Their Char Sui is home made on the

> premises.



I was referring to the restaurant in chinatown which was known for rude staff and huge plates of food, see below


https://www.standard.co.uk/go/london/restaurants/rude-awakening-at-wong-kei-7431958.html

Satellite Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Seabag Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > Satellite Wrote:

> >

> --------------------------------------------------

>

> > -----

> > > "work in Won Kei in China Town and the food

> is

> > > quite similar."

> > >

> > > Cheap and full of MSG then?

> >

> >

> > Never had an msg issue with either. That?s a

> bit

> > of a perpetual myth around such food. I?m not

> > saying it?s never used, but ?full of? along

> with

> > ?cheap? has a certain dismissive ring to it,

> no?

> >

> > The WonKei reference is more towards a Hong

> Kong

> > style of Chinese restaurant.

> >

> > And like any restaurant, if you don?t want a

> > certain ingredient, like MSG, just tell them.

> But

> > I like 148, they try hard and make some nice

> > dishes. Their Char Sui is home made on the

> > premises.

>

>

> I was referring to the restaurant in chinatown

> which was known for rude staff and huge plates of

> food, see below

>

> https://www.standard.co.uk/go/london/restaurants/r

> ude-awakening-at-wong-kei-7431958.html


So what?s your point?


That article was from 2001, it mentions the changes, but little else and nothing about MSG in the article. I?m wondering if you?ve ever eaten there?


Or is this a place that you?ve just heard about, and assumed it was poor quality, because it?s ?cheap? and therefore it?s assumed to be ?full of MSG?


Lazy conformation bias is a dangerous thing.

rahrahrah Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> There is nothing wrong with MSG


I agree per se, but it?s bandied around dismissively, often as a cultural bias.




https://www.google.co.uk/amp/s/amp.theguardian.com/lifeandstyle/2018/may/21/chinese-restaurant-syndrome-has-msg-been-unfairly-demonised

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • So top of Lane. Local Sainsbury, middle Co Op and M and S and bottom Tesco Express…..now everyone should be happy except those that want a Waitrose as well…0h and  don’t forget M and S near ED Station….
    • Direct link to joint statement : https://thehaguegroup.org/meetings-bogota-en/?link_id=2&can_id=2d0a0048aad3d4915e3e761ac87ffe47&source=email-pi-briefing-no-26-the-bogota-breakthrough&email_referrer=email_2819587&email_subject=pi-briefing-no-26-the-bogot_-breakthrough&&   No. 26 | The Bogotá Breakthrough “The era of impunity is over.” That was the message from Bogotá, Colombia, where governments from across the Global South and beyond took the most ambitious coordinated action since Israel’s genocidal assault on Gaza began 21 months ago. Convened by The Hague Group and co-chaired by the governments of Colombia and South Africa, the Emergency Conference on Palestine brought together 30 states for two days of intensive deliberation — and emerged with a concrete, coordinated six-point plan to restrain Israel’s war machine and uphold international law. States took up the call from their host, Colombian President and Progressive International Council Member Gustavo Petro, who had urged them to be “protagonists together.” Twelve governments signed onto the measures immediately. The rest now have a deadline: 20 September 2025, on the eve of the United Nations General Assembly. The unprecedented six measures commit states to:     Prevent military and dual use exports to Israel.     Refuse Israeli weapons transfers at their ports.     Prevent vessels carrying weapons to Israel under their national flags.     Review all public contracts to prevent public institutions and funds from supporting Israel’s illegal occupation.     Pursue justice for international crimes.     Support universal jurisdiction to hold perpetrators accountable. “We came to Bogotá to make history — and we did,” said Colombian President Gustavo Petro. “Together, we have begun the work of ending the era of impunity. These measures show that we will no longer allow international law to be treated as optional, or Palestinian life as disposable.” The measures are not symbolic. They are grounded in binding obligations under international law — including the International Court of Justice’s July 2024 advisory opinion declaring Israel’s occupation unlawful, and September 2024’s UN General Assembly Resolution ES-10/24, which gave states a 12-month deadline to act. UN Special Rapporteur on the situation of human rights in the occupied Palestinian territory Francesca Albanese called them “a momentous step forward.” “The Hague Group was born to advance international law in an era of impunity,” said South Africa’s Foreign Minister, Ronald Lamola. “The measures adopted in Bogotá show that we are serious — and that coordinated state action is possible.” The response from Washington was swift — and revealing. In a threatening statement to journalists, a US State Department spokesperson accused The Hague Group of “seeking to isolate Israel” and warned that the US would “aggressively defend our interests, our military, and our allies, including Israel, from such coordinated legal and diplomatic” actions. But instead of deterring action, the threats have only clarified the stakes. In Bogotá, states did not flinch. They acted — and they invite the world to join them. The deadline for further states to take up the measures is now two months away. And with it, the pressure is mounting for governments across the world — from Brazil to Ireland, Chile to Spain — to match words with action. As Albanese said, “the clock is now ticking for states — from Europe to the Arab world and beyond — to join them.” This is not a moment to observe. It is a moment to act. Share the Joint Statement from Bogotá and popularise the six measures. Write to your elected representative and your government and demand they sign on before 20 September. History was made in Bogotá. Now, it’s up to all of us to ensure it becomes reality, that Palestinian life is not disposable and international law is not optional. The era of impunity is coming to an end. Palestine is not alone. In solidarity, The Progressive International Secretariat  
    • Most countries charge for entry to museums and galleries, often a different rate for locals (tax payers) and foreign nationals. The National Gallery could do this, also places like the Museums in South Kensington, the British Library and other tax-funded institutions. Many cities abroad add a tourist tax to hotel bills. It means tourists help pay for public services.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...