Jump to content

random stuff


El Pibe

Recommended Posts

ha ha, ever the way.


I enjoyed aaronovich's voodo histories, which in writing he obviosuly found himself similarly accused.

It's the ultimate get out clause that allows CT types to wallow in their own circular logic.


This was fun, how Jimmy Page destroyed Eddie and the Hot Rod

http://greatwen.com/2013/03/27/jimmy-page-aleister-crowley-and-the-curse-of-eddie-and-the-hot-rods/

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Fantastic (if slightly tongue-in-cheek) article on the current state of GBSSR.

http://potlatch.typepad.com/weblog/2013/04/brezhnev-capitalism.html


also linked to because it's the sort of thing that's guaranteed to wind Huguenot up ;)


Though he does commit the cardianl sin of using trope=motif rather than trope=metaphor, but that's probably one for the irrational hatreds thread.....

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The fascinating and disturbing world of FOOF (or dioxygen diflouride to give it its scientific name).


http://pipeline.corante.com/archives/2010/02/23/things_i_wont_work_with_dioxygen_difluoride.php


Highlight: "Being a high energy oxidizer, dioxygen difluoride reacted vigorously with organic compounds, even at temperatures close to its melting point. It reacted instantaneously with solid ethyl alcohol, producing a blue flame and an explosion. When a drop of liquid 02F2 was added to liquid methane, cooled at 90?K., a white flame was produced instantaneously, which turned green upon further burning. When 0.2 (mL) of liquid 02F2 was added to 0.5 (mL) of liquid CH4 at 90?K., a violent explosion occurred."


This stuff can, literally, set ice on fire. Mental.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

A fellow XKCD reader, obvs.


Have you read any more from that chap's series of "Things I Won't Work With"? I don't know one end of a test tube from another but even I know that some of this stuff sounds utterly horrific.


When discussing the rather smelly selenophenol he notes its smell is "...the biggest stinker I have run across. . .imagine 6 skunks wrapped in rubber innertubes and the whole thing is set ablaze. That might approach the metaphysical stench of this material."


Marvellous. [insert curry/pooh joke here]

Link to comment
Share on other sites

interesting stuff, investment manager Lelsie GRantham on bubbles and climate change.

http://www.guardian.co.uk/environment/blog/2013/apr/15/jeremy-grantham-population-china-climate


[climate change sceptics] are in the "screaming loudly" rather than the "fact based" part of the exercise, because they don't have the facts. They are masters at manufacturing doubt. What I have noticed on the blogs and in the comments section under articles is that over several years, as the scientific evidence for climate change gets stronger, the tone of the sceptics is getting shriller and more vicious and nastier all the time. The equivalent on the other side is a weary resignation, sorrow and frustration and amazement that people on the other side can't look at the facts. The sceptics are getting angrier and more vicious every year despite the more storms we have, and the more mad crazy weather we have?



One of the problems is that typically you are not dealing with the facts. Putting in more facts makes the sceptics more angry. They have profound beliefs ? as opposed to knowledge ? that they are willing to protect by all manner of psychological tricks. So you have people who are very smart - even great analysts and hedge fund managers - who on paper know that their argument is wrong, but who promote it fiercely because they are libertarians. Libertarians believe that any government interference is bad. Anyone with a brain knows that climate change needs governmental leadership and they can smell this is bad news for their philosophy.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The barking mad worlds of conspiracy theorists and jihadists collide

http://www.foreignpolicy.com/articles/2013/04/16/what_extremists_are_saying_about_the_boston_massacre?page=full


I noticed an even barkinger mad film shared on facebook which had already decided it was a 'false flag' operation, without even bothering for an official narrative to refute, and, bizarrely enough, placed the blame squarely at the feet of Steve Jackson who did those 'Choose Your Own Adventure' books I enjoyed as a boy.


The world would definitely be a duller place without them!!


*keenly awaits New Nexus' first linky on the matter*

Link to comment
Share on other sites

El Pibe Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> interesting stuff, investment manager Lelsie

> GRantham on bubbles and climate change.


I did wonder what he'd been up to after leaving Eastenders.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I stumbled upon Aeon when reading this article about dark matter.


I flicked about to see if there was anything else interesting and found this wonderfully overwrought meditation on gothic literature.

It reads like one of Ted Max's parodies, marvellous!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • You could apply the same argument to any kind of penalty as an effective deterrent.  Better than doing nothing. 
    • Check the link I provided above. It’s gives a very full account of where the push for LTNs came from, (in brief, central government). The consultation did not show that the majority of local residents were against LTN. Not for the first time, you’ve confused a ‘consultation’ with a ‘referendum’. 
    • Rockets said: "Perhaps you should be asking who is lobbying the council to close the junction or parts of it or why the council is happy to waste so much of our money on it - who are they representing as even their own consultation demonstrated they did not have support from the local community for the measures? The results showed the majority of local residents were against the measure...but they are going ahead with them anyway" This.   
    • LTNs were pushed by the Conservative government (as was ULEZ). They were one of several active travel measures which were a condition of the TFL funding settlement post Covid.  £69m of direct borough funding (per year) was also provided to support more localised investment in walking and cycling schemes across the city and to accelerate the roll-out of LTNs…but we all know that Boris Johnson and grant shapps are secret commies 🤣 I’ve no idea. I do know that people are covering their plates and driving through, and that’s probably an accident waiting to happen (although clearly down to signage 🤣). The emergency services have agreed the changes, so I would assume that on balance they think it’s the right move. Whilst ‘One’ are suggesting the emergency services have agreed the changes under pressure, they wont say what sort of pressure, or who it’s coming from 🤔. Perhaps it’s the commies again 🤣😂
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...