Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Popped into M&S on Lordship Lane this evening and was pretty disgusted to find the UCKG allowed to collect money in there through bag packing and carol singing.


It's not obvious that they're an international church (their logo could be mistaken for the British Heart Foundation's at first glance) and when asked, they're very vague about what the collection funds.


It seems M&S head office weren't happy about them operating in Hampstead last year, so why they're allowed in ED I don't know. https://www.hamhigh.co.uk/news/marks-and-spencer-investigate-hampstead-fundraising-by-universal-church-of-the-kingdom-of-god-1-5845999


For those that aren't familiar with them, the Universal Church of the Kingdom of God was founded in 1977 by Edir Macedo, a former lottery assistant, who propounded a doctrine of intense prayer, exorcisms and financial sacrifice.


The church has frequently been accused of cult-like illegal activities and corruption, including money laundering, charlatanism, and witchcraft, as well as homophobia and intolerance towards other religions.


UCKG leaders promote "prosperity theology" ? through which committed believers are told their faith and regular, generous donations can help them achieve material wealth. Members are expected to ?tithe? 10% of their gross income or benefits to the church. The UCKG has a turnover of over ?700 million, and their founder is now a billionaire.


Do you remember the tragic case of 8 year old Victoria Climbi?? Although they were cleared of involvement in her murder, a UCKG Pastor saw her and expressed the view that she was possessed by an evil spirit. The UCKG had been planning to hold a service to "cast out the devil" from her on the day she died.


Among other facts: in the past they've peddled miracle cures, and blamed headaches and depression on "demons". The church openly supports Brazil's president Jair Bolsonaro. The church spent an estimated ?130m on a replica of Solomon's Temple in S?o Paulo.


Obviously people are entitled to their beliefs, and many religious groups do fantastic charitable work. However, at best UCKG are a proselytising religious group, at worst a dangerous, corrupt sect who prey on the desperate.


In addition to bucket shaking, they've come to my door twice this week seeking donations. Please don't give them your money, there are far more deserving recipients.


For more on UCKG:


https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Universal_Church_of_the_Kingdom_of_God


https://newrepublic.com/article/153083/demon-slaying-pentecostal-billionaire-ushering-post-catholic-brazil


https://www.forbes.com/profile/edir-macedo/#43dcca232fcf


https://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2009/aug/13/brazil-evangelical-leader-charged-fraud


https://newhumanist.org.uk/articles/5360/bringing-god-to-the-ballot-box


https://cityroom.blogs.nytimes.com/2013/02/17/eagerly-awaiting-release-of-brazilian-evangelicals-autobiography-in-soho/

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/243731-dodgy-church-collecting-in-ms/
Share on other sites

Oh dear, 2 years running? Thanks dbboy. Looks like head office officially frown upon them when contacted by the media, but it's actually left up to individual branch managers. I voted with my feet last night, but I'll contact the manager and head office today. Hope others will do the same.

They're currently doorstepping in the Ruskin Park area and after a youth rang the bell and invited himself into our closed porch, I told him to leave our property. Had he not been so young, I'd have challenged him more.


Had I not read the OP this morning, I wouldn't have known about them so thanks for the heads-up.

Dreadful.


Jay Rayner wrote a piece about them a while back. I tweeted to him in an attempt to get him to pick it up. Feel free to retweet the below - maybe if there?s a bit of social media attention they might finally do something about it. I?ve complained to their complaints team the past three years and been fobbed off.




They were getting a lot of donations in M&S yesterday despite some pretty dire singing. One of the women was complaining her bucket was too heavy to hold. I didn't give them anything because I remembered last year's thread but most people won't stop to look at the details of the charity.

I complained to M&S yesterday and tried unsuccessfully to get through to the store by phone however I have just spoken to the store manager who has promised that they will not operate from the store today or in future. It seems they just arrived, said ?they collected last year? and were allowed in, no questions asked???


They seem to target M&S...perhaps M&S need to ensure all their branches local to UCKG outlets know.

I agree will all of the above.......but please remember that those people who are ?on the ground? doing the collections/ door knocking etc are not really the ones at fault. They have unfortunately been hooked into the organisation and are unaware of dodgy dealings and heavily under the influence of indoctrination.


Just saying......before they are tackled harshly.


It is M&S who should be challenged here

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Per Cllr McAsh, as quoted above: “We are currently updating our Enforcement Policy and changes will allow for the issuing of civil penalties ranging from £175 to £300 for visible smoke emissions, replacing the previous reliance on criminal prosecution. " Is anyone au fait with the Clean Air Act 1993, and  particularly with the state of 'Smoke Control' law and practice generally?  I've just been looking  through some of it for the first time and, AFAICS, the "civil penalties ranging from £175 to £300" were introduced into the Clean Air Act, at Schedule 1A, in May 2022.  So it seems that, in this particular,  it's a matter of the enforcement policy trailing well behind the legislation.  I'm not criticising that at all, but am curious.  
    • Here's the part of march46's linked-to Southwark News article pertaining to Southwark Council. "Southwark Council were also contacted for a response. "Councillor James McAsh, Cabinet Member for Clean Air, Streets & Waste said: “One of Southwark’s key priorities is to create a healthy environment for our residents. “To achieve this we closely monitor legislation and measures that influence air pollution – our entire borough apart from inland waterways is designated as a Smoke Control Area, and we also offer substantial provision for electric vehicles to promote alternative fuel travel options and our Streets for People strategy. “We as a council support the work of Mums for Lungs and recognise the health and environmental impacts of domestic solid fuel burning, particularly from wood-burning appliances. “We are currently updating our Enforcement Policy and changes will allow for the issuing of civil penalties ranging from £175 to £300 for visible smoke emissions, replacing the previous reliance on criminal prosecution.  “This work is being undertaken in collaboration with other London boroughs as part of the pan-London Wood Burning Project, which aims to harmonise enforcement approaches and share best practice across the capital.” ETA: And here's a post I made a few years ago, with tangential relevance.  https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/278140-early-morning-drone-flying/?do=findComment&comment=1493274  
    • The solicitor is also the Executor. Big mistake, but my Aunt was very old, and this was the Covid years and shortly after so impossible to intervene and get a couple of close relatives to do this.  She had no children so this is the nephews and nieces. He is a single practitioner, and most at his age would have long since retired - there is a question over his competence Two letters have already gone essentially complaining - batted off and 'amusingly' one put the blame on us. There are five on our side, all speaking to each other, and ideally would work as a single point of contact.  But he has said that this is not allowed - we've all given approval to act on each others behalf. There are five on her late husband's side, who have not engaged with us despite the suggestion to work as a team, There is one other, who get's the lion's share, the typicical 'friend', but we are long since challenging the will. I would like to put another complaint together that he has not used modern collective communication (I expect that he is incapable) which had seriously delayed the execution of the will.   I know many in their 80s very adept with smart phones so that is not an ageist comment. The house has deteriorated very badly, with cold, damp and a serious leak.  PM me if you want to see the dreadful condition that it is now in. I would also question why if the five of us are happy to work together why all of us need to confirm in writing.             The house was lived in until Feb 23, and has been allowed to get like this.
    • Isn’t a five yearly electricity safety certificate one of the things the landlord must give for a legal tenancy?
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...