Jump to content

Recommended Posts

A good friend was very severly injured when his bike collided with a newly installed Olypmic 'Zil' lane barrier - he was driving a route he knew well and had not 'registered' the barrier, I suspect only very recently installed. I believe this was a night-time accident, so visibility was possibly also not that good. Do be careful if you are on two wheels (or four) and keep alert to road changes.


Edited to say - No, the accident wasn't in ED, but many of us do go outside ED to travel in London; the injured man is local (SE Londoner).

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/24689-warning-olympic-road-changes/
Share on other sites

The barrier may not have moved, but it did surprise him. Like most people he operates at least partly from a model of the world - we actually percieve (see) a very narrow amount - try holding your arms out to the side at eye level and bringing them round towards your nose - you'll be surprised at how long you have to ait to see your fingers, when you 'think' of the world with virtually 180 degrees of view, and act accordingly to that model.


He was driving a route he knew well, his model of that route didn't have a Zil barrier in it, by the time he was aware of that, it was too late to avoid it. We are actually less likely to have accidents in roads we don't know well, when we have to force ourselves to see 'everything'.


I wasn't making an excuse for him, but I know him to be a very experienced driver, so I was alerting readers to avoid the mistake he made. But then, I belong to a species which can make mistakes - I am so glad for you that you don't.

The OP has a point though.....the layout and flow of many junctions and roundabouts changed overnight, eliminating some contra flow cycle lanes and there's no signage to indicate the new layout to cyclists. One example is coming off Westminster Bridge to Parliament Square. Buses and cycles had a seperate filter right turn lane. Now you have to go all the way around parliament square to come back on Whitehall. I got caught out by it last night. It seems as though olympic lanes and the flow of those has been given precedent over the safety of some road users.
The traffic lanes outside my office are one way, except that, overnight, they're not any more. So you have to remember to look both ways before stepping out into the traffic and it doesn't come automatically after all these years of crossing that road. You have to have your wits about you because a lot of the roads that we use have changed overnight.

titch juicy Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> While i'm sorry for your friend and hope he is ok,

> I suspect the barrier didn't jump out and surprise

> him.

>

> I would've thought with a little care, any new

> road or traffic measures can be easily avoided.



Which is why you often see big red signs with "traffic signal timings changed" or "new road layout ahead".


Yes, you'd think a barrier would be fairly obvious, but as others have stated it's not so straighforward!

Loz Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Whilst I agree that the road layout changes are a

> pain, if someone cycles into a stationary barrier

> I think we can safely assume they aren't paying as

> much attention to the road as they should. Is

> anything ever a cyclist's fault?



That wasn't my point. Of course I was perfectly aware of the road around me last night but when you have travelled the same route for years, unless a sign tells you there's a new layout and the flow of it (which on Westminster bridge it doesn't, you are suddenly thrown as the brain tries to make sense of it for you. We know the lights have been rephased. We know there are Olympic lanes. They are easy to see. But there are a lack of signs showing the new layout of changes to junctions and roundabouts.....

I expect the people that have most trouble understanding the new systems are the same people that won't drive in bus lanes, even when you're permitted to. I had a feller wind down his window and argue with me when driving down the inside of him, using the bus lane (in permitted hours) on east dulwich road, where it meets peckham rye. I pointed out the sign to him, to which he replied, "it doesn't matter, it's a bus lane".
There was an article in the times today titch, kind of endorsing what you are saying........that even though there are electronic boards saying when Olympic lanes are operational, many drivers are too scared to drive down them at any time for fear of a fine.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • And from what I remember, she eventually cut the tea shop for a similar  reason to chandelier.  Chariot style buggies
    • Oh yes, it could have been about there, I can't remember exactly. At one point there seemed to be a load of pizza places opening on NCR. I vaguely remember the one we used to use was put out of business by another one which opened. Wasn't Grace and Favour's food offering more of a tea shop at the back of the actual shop? If memory serves the owner, whose name escapes me now, was one of the earliest people I know to move to Hastings. Which must now be crammed with South East Londoners 🤣
    • That Neal Street veggie cafe was great. Food For Thought ❤️
    • Hi Dogkennelhillbilly, You won't be aware that i proposed infill sites for housing in East Dulwich - the garages on Bassano Street and Henslowe that respectively became 1-4 Dill Terrace family houses and the 78, 80, 80A Henslowe Street family houses. These were council owned garages and it was frustrating how slow the council was to go from my idea to completion (roughly eight years). East Dulwich has some other vacant WW2 bomb sites I'm guessing that the private land owners have been sitting on.Owe for a land tax for vacant land.  WRT to the builders yard by East dulwich station. Southwark Council has an agreed policy the area should remain suburban 2/3 storeys maximum. But the approved scheme is 9 storeys of student accommodation. Very hard to put this genie back in the bottle. The council has recently publicly stated lower ratios of social housing will be required. I will be amazed if the developer doesn't submit another application now they have the 9 storeys approved but with significantly less social housing. The less social housing the higher the land values. The higher the land values the less social housing viability reports state are possible.  If we really want to increase home supply - Southwark have over 6,000 empty homes. Vancouver charges a low % of the value of empty homes and rapidly eased this problem. Parts of Wales have introduced under Article 4 planning permission is required for second homes seeing within 12 months a dramatic decrease in property prices. Southwark Council have Article 4 requirements - why not add this one? It takes National political will to solve this AND regional and local authorities such as the second home council tax premium and these being used promptly. 
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...