Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Spartacus Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Mr chicken

> Your attempt to belittle my comments has shown

> your ignorance concerning others needs and

> mobility challenges which doesn't put you in a

> good light morally.


Your obvious misrepresentation of my arguments when I simply don't agree with you puts you in a substantially less good light. Since you're engaging in little more than "whataboutism" while inventing stances for me, I can play the same game, viz:


"What about the 4000 people who die in London every year due to air pollution? The only way to save them is to drastically reduce the number of cars but you don't appear to be concerned with them. Morally speaking that doesn't put you in a good light."


It's neither fun nor productive to play such a game, so how about we stop, eh?

I am particularly concerned by the reduction of public transport access to Rye Lane and the key railway station.


The gridlock caused by the road closures are a very serious cause for concern.


Also not help by children using the new car free area as a playground - there are still bikes using this as a highway so only a matter of time before there is some sort of collision.

tiddles Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------


> Also not help by children using the new car free

> area as a playground - there are still bikes using

> this as a highway so only a matter of time before

> there is some sort of collision.


Number of pedestrians killed by cyclists in 2017: 3

Number of pedestrians killed by cars: 470


I know which one I'll be losing sleep over

Rockets Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> rahrahrah Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > Ask cars to stop driving through a few

> residential

> > streets and people lose their sh*t.

>

>

> But are they? Aren't they just saying that these

> particular closures are causing huge issues

> elsewhere and not dealing with the issue they were

> designed to...infact they are making things

> worse.



Well not everyone, but certainly when people are saying that they're going to leave the area and others are vandalising the planters - it seems like a fairly hysterical / disproportionate response imo.

Rockets Wrote:

> Aren't they just saying that these

> particular closures are causing huge issues

> elsewhere and not dealing with the issue they were

> designed to...infact they are making things

> worse.


How would the proposal from 'One Dulwich' for timed restrictions be better? Presumably the timed restrictions would include the morning and evening rush hours? This implies that the issue is a very brief diversion at quiet times? Is that what people are concerned about?

The timed restrictions by One Dulwich are a red herring in my opinion. If a small diversion at times when the roads are quiet is really their issue, I would be surprised.


When 'One Dulwich' say that they support the aims of the scheme (which are ultimately to reduce the number of car journeys)... well, the only way to achieve this is to make driving less appealing. Which means less convenient. In reality, this is what many of their supporters are against.


I wish they would be more straight forward, because then we could have an honest conversation about convenience / benefits versus the inconvenience / costs of non essential car journeys.

Rahrah why don't you getting the honesty ball rolling tell us about how your car journey you boasted about the other day was essential?


"> > rahrahrah Wrote:

> >

> --------------------------------------------------

>

> > -----

> > > I drove from townley/ EDH up through the

> > village

> > > to join south circular at 5:30. It was a 5

> > minute

> > > diversion at most."

Abe_froeman Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Rahrah why don't you getting the honesty ball

> rolling tell us about how your car journey you

> boasted about the other day was essential?

>

> "> > rahrahrah Wrote:

> > >

> >

> --------------------------------------------------

>

> >

> > > -----

> > > > I drove from townley/ EDH up through the

> > > village

> > > > to join south circular at 5:30. It was a 5

> > > minute

> > > > diversion at most."


I didn't say it was essential, or that only essential journeys are legimate. It would have been very difficult to do via public transport however, probably not impossible. Again, suggesting that we need to try and disincentivise car journeys (especially those which can be easily undertaken by alternative modes of travel, which one might characterise as non-essential), is not calling for a ban on car journeys. The idea that you are either 'pro-car' or 'anti-car' is an example of extremely binary thinking.


Also, I wasn't 'boasting' about my car journey. I was pointing out that the diversion that was necessary in order to undertake it (even at rush hour) was fairly minimal.


Your post just shows that you are not interested in actually debating the issues, but rather trying (poorly) to 'score points'.

Ah, that was the local kids, bored. They probably had no idea that the grown ups are engaging in a worthy debate about this.


thebestnameshavegone Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> This is a great look, One Dulwich:

> https://twitter.com/simonstill/status/128514547519

> 7423616

dulwichfolk Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Would house prices actually go down due to these

> closures, surely a quieter road at the expense of

> other roads would make the prices go up on court

> road etc?


Yeah, I would have thought so, although it's probably pretty marginal either way. Not sure house prices is really relevant to why people are supporting or objecting to the scheme.

Bicknell Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I dont know - im no expert - but if you dont

> need to close a road day and night why do it? If

> it makes life easier for people to have it open

> some of teh time, why not?


This is a reasonable question. I feel like the physical infrastructure and enforcement needed to do it, for the sake of a little more convenience for a small number of people at quiet times, might be excessive. But perhaps ?One Dulwich? could put forwards concrete proposal for how it might operate.

As someone who lives on Dulwich Village, I wouldn't characterise the road closures as creating a "gated community". What I see is that the main road through the village creates a highway from the South Circular to the north of the borough, and that when the weight of traffic eases, people speed along Dulwich Village. Do I have to be anti-car or anti-cycle to see this as a poor outcome?

If this was the case there could eventually be a position held by residents of that area where the Council have realised from finally listening to complaints that their ill-advised (if they were) changes to traffic were a mistake / over-zealous, but when they attempt to revert the changes they face opposition from those concerned their house prices will drop if that happens !!


spider69 Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> So if you had a choice to live on a closed off

> road or another with traffic you would not take

> it?

>

> Of course house prices would go up.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Calling All Private Chefs – We’re Looking for You! We’re currently looking for talented private chefs in and around East Dulwich (and across London) for a number of exciting upcoming bookings and events. If you’re a chef, or know someone who is, we’d love to hear from you. Please drop your name, contact info, and a quick intro below or message directly. Thanks! Anthony Bird & Co Events
    • Since you’re clearly not experiencing what we are I’m not sure I agree with any of your points. I also asked for anyone else having a similar problem… it’s absolutely fine if you’re not but I’d appreciate less of the “go live your life”. There is no need to comment with that tone, it doesn’t provide us with any help for the matter. Nor is it polite. We’re a very kind family simply not wanting damage and don’t find the actions necessary. It’s been the same driver/delivery for a while and this never used to happen. I wouldn’t post this on the forum if it wasn’t getting so frustrating. Again, the kids and myself have kindly asked for this to stop a few times with no success. We all work hard for our living and would never want (nor are we trying) to rid someone of their livelihood. But similarly, I don’t find it fair. Please feel free to PM me if anyone has any advise or shares the same.  
    • And now we have the worst labour government in many many decades who, by moving to your position on the right, are ushering in a far right reform government. Well done you.
    • You implied he did a good job in your first paragraph when you said you would have hated to see Corbyn lead the country through Covid - the alternative being Johnson, presumably? With the results we all saw. Unite - you have a problem with unions? Who work hard to see that their members get a fair deal in their workplace? How exactly are these people and groups "all as bad as each other"? In what way? Labour "purging their party of the far-left" has given us a weak prime minister who has apparently deserted any "left" (aka caring for other people and having decent moral principles) leanings he ever had. Which is why people appear to be leaving Labour in droves and voting, or intending to vote, Green or Lib Dem or for an independent Left candidate. Starmer has shot himself in the foot, in my opinion. But what would I know. What worked?! I don't know enough about what you are talking about to comment, but "believing" you know the reason someone did something does not make it true. I don't believe that Corbyn ever got "starstruck" or "forgot about his politics", but if you can provide evidence that those things are true, then fair enough. I don't think you can, though.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...