Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Wow Penguin68


With uninformed comments like this, this forum gets more like the daily mail comments section every day


Yes of course, it's a class war by a tory government on it's wealthy car owning voters


The policy to reduce car usage and dedicate more road space post-covid, to pedestrians and cyclists is a national tory policy

it's a class war by a tory government on it's wealthy car owning voters


Goodness, and there was me thinking that Labour were in power in Southwark - how did I miss that? The labour party in Southwark is continuing its publicly stated (they won an election on that) position to remove, as much as they can, private cars from Southwark. People voted for that (and it was also lib dem policy).


If they are using Conservative legislation to achieve their ends, why wouldn't they? My point was that complaining that the plans didn't meet objectives that the council frankly isn't interested in is to miss the point. No, their plans don't improve the things that people might have wanted, like reducing queuing traffic pumping out fumes - but that was never their end.


Conservative policy, if it's about anything, is about reducing car usage to reduce pollution. That's not the key aim of the local labour party whose policy long pre-dates Covid.


And if you actually think that the conservatives won the last general election on the back of 'wealthy, car owning voters' (I had to assume you were joking there) - you did not notice what was happening north of The Wash.

I really don't think this is about class war. We do need to reduce the number of car journeys and encourage active travel as much as possible if we're going to tackle, pollution, obesity and generally improve the environment for people and businesses.

Rah

Won't the extended ULEZ improve the environment ?


I can see the glory grabbing now

Southwark saying we done good reducing pollution by blocking streets and the mayor saying the same by reducing older polluting vehicles (despite the environmental cost of building new cars being higher than keeping older cars running)


It's going to be Glory Road !

Thanks Andrewc


A 20 Year old study which needs a modern rewrite and it doesn't take into account the environmental damage caused by farming battery components and how many miles an old car actually drives per year compared to a brand new one (older cars tend to be classics and are driven less miles per year)


Would be interested in seeing a more up to date version.

alice Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> So it?s just a coincidence that the main

> beneficiaries are those in the wealthier part of

> our borough?


In ED and DV it is hard to avoid wealthy streets isn't it? Is Melbourne Grove an outlier in ED? And Rye Lane is not wealthy. I don't know where else in Southwark this is happening, I'm assuming not only in Dulwich as it's a London wide initiative.

Browning Street and other parts of North Walworth are also having street closures to make it easier and healthier to walk and cycling. These would generally be reckoned deprived areas -- like Rye Lane, as you say.

.

this is the Commonplace page for comments https://walworthstreetspace.commonplace.is/comments. Basically they are blocking a rat-run across the Walworth Road between the A2 and A3. This is the page which explains what they are doing and why https://s3-eu-west-2.amazonaws.com/commonplace-customer-assets/walworthstreetspace/Walworth%20Frequently%20Asked%20Questions.pdf



rachp Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> alice Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > So it?s just a coincidence that the main

> > beneficiaries are those in the wealthier part

> of

> > our borough?

>

> In ED and DV it is hard to avoid wealthy streets

> isn't it? Is Melbourne Grove an outlier in ED? And

> Rye Lane is not wealthy. I don't know where else

> in Southwark this is happening, I'm assuming not

> only in Dulwich as it's a London wide initiative.

Is the closure of Rye Lane comparable ? It was already more or less closed to all vehicles except buses .


It disadvantages the many shoppers who rely on buses and the retail outlets who have already taken a hit from Covid .


And I've not found it helpful for social distancing as walking in the road amongst bikes ,scooters,skate boards etc rather scary .Though I guess this might change .

there were loads of private cars and lorries in Rye Lane from late morning onwards. There's a rat-run which comes into Rye Lane from Bournemouth Road, turns left and then exits right down Choumert Road. There's another thread of traffic which comes into Rye Lane from the Primark end and exits at the south end by the Morning Star. Some of it does an illegal right turn to rejoin the main traffic at the Copeland Road lights.


The buses could be allowed in with a bus gate but buses probably need speed limiters to operate in such a heavy footfall environment as Rye Lane. Speed limiters (limited to 20) are said to be on their way but never seem to arrive


intexasatthe moment Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Is the closure of Rye Lane comparable ? It was

> already more or less closed to all vehicles except

> buses .

>

> It disadvantages the many shoppers who rely on

> buses and the retail outlets who have already

> taken a hit from Covid .

>

> And I've not found it helpful for social

> distancing as walking in the road amongst bikes

> ,scooters,skate boards etc rather scary .Though I

> guess this might change .

spider69 Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I would not call it a major town centre any more

> more of a street selling cheap rubbish.


It's used by many people and perhaps pedestrianisation may help it broaden it's appeal and encourage a greater mix of shops.

rupert james Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> All selling the same stuff as now.

>

> It had a greater mix of shops I recall but what is

> now there is what the residents wanted.



Strangely it's not just locals who shop there, a percentage of shoppers come from other parts of the country as the products on sale are better value in Peckham. The change with more bars and nightlife that has been occurring will also have an impact on the day time offering although this is reliant on high streets in general surviving the triple whammy of internet, Covid and local councils

womanofdulwich Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> when/who is going to occupy the space in Dulwich

> Village at the end of Court Lane- pop up pizzas?

> fish n chips? cocktails?


I believe this space is now called Dulwich Square?

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • For a while there was an unexpected glitch in planning laws that meant phone box operators (which is obviously mostly BT, but there were others) didn't need council permission to replace call boxes with small electronic billboards, so long as you could make calls from the billboard. I *think* the one on the corner of Croxted Rd and Park Hall Rd is an example of that. So the operators weren't always in a rush to remove the call boxes even when they didn't make any money on calls. I don't know if it still works like this. https://www.local.gov.uk/about/news/lga-call-crackdown-trojan-telephone-boxes-amid-900-cent-rise-some-areas
    • It is just a witch hunt. The estate agent has taken responsibility. FFS leave the poor woman alone. ETA: And please  stop calling her Rachel. You don't call Starmer Keir.
    • As said, why are you not eating humble pie for a non-story? I expect that scores of landlords are unaware or made mistakes in this territory.  And this is not just the Chancellor but a married couple.  It feels like you and others are taking joy in demonising her. The only question would be is the house suitable for renting out?  I expect it is, and if not that is up to Southwark to take action rather than keyboard warriors.  The only surprises are the expense of licensing - surely time for a thread on "is licensing a money maker for local authorities?".  I'm being facetious.  And that the cost of rental, which feels fairly reasonable based on this area. By all means go after rogue landlords.  Be my guest.  I was horrified to see some of the properties rented in London and beyond by family members.  Not all bad. Oh and another question.  Haven't I got better things to do than comment on this 'no story here' thread?  😁
    • Week 10 fixtures...   Saturday 1st November Brighton & Hove Albion v Leeds United Burnley v Arsenal Crystal Palace v Brentford  Fulham v Wolverhampton Wanderers Nottingham Forest v Manchester United Tottenham Hotspur v Chelsea Liverpool v Aston Villa   Sunday 2nd November West Ham United v Newcastle United Manchester City v AFC Bournemouth   Monday 3rd November Sunderland v Everton
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...