Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Roky Erickson Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-8713579/F

> ury-FIRE-ENGINE-gets-stuck-new-cycle-lane-Covid-fr

> iendly-traffic-measures.html


"Abi Babalola, 40, says her 10 minute school run now takes more than 30 minutes due to her having to weave her way around the streets of Brixton - even passing near to her home 'a number of times' in the process."


A 10 min car journey.


This is what this scheme is for. To make people change behaviour - stupid behaviour like this.

I'm not going to say anything specific about anyone because I don't know their circumstances. However, 90% of stay at home parents whose journey involves a 10 min school run through the centre of Brixton could be choosing a different form of transport without undue hardship. And it's exactly those journeys that have to go.

And looking on street view, ferndale road is quite narrow with cars parked each side. Fire engines are going to get stuck there with planters or no planters - although no one complains when it's cars impeeding the emergency servcies.


In this case it looks like there should have been double yellows painted opposite the planter to stop the white car parking on the corner. Easily fixed.



Dogkennelhillbilly Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I'm not going to say anything specific about

> anyone because I don't know their circumstances.

> However, 90% of stay at home parents whose journey

> involves a 10 min school run through the centre of

> Brixton could be choosing a different form of

> transport without undue hardship. And it's exactly

> those journeys that have to go.

But really bad optics don't you agree - that type of image sticks and forms opinions. If there are no double-yellows why not - council oversight probably? Once again, it is what happens when you rush to implement something and demonstrates how poorly executed it is being done across the country and is wonderful ammunition for the anti-closure lobby.
I?m not sure how many times one has to say... I do not drive, I walk and cycle, I have lived here on this road for 30 years and this is the worst it has ever been. I want less cars on all roads, but shunting more traffic on already polluted roads with high density residences is not a gain in health and environment for my neighbours. If I lived on a gated road in a lovely big house with a lovely big garden that would be great. People living on East Dulwich Grove in flat with no garden have to put up with noise and pollution for over four hours a day, while other residents have only local traffic.. it stinks of inequality.

heartblock Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I?m not sure how many times one has to say... I do

> not drive, I walk and cycle, I have lived here on

> this road for 30 years and this is the worst it

> has ever been. I want less cars on all roads, but

> shunting more traffic on already polluted roads

> with high density residences is not a gain in

> health and environment for my neighbours. If I

> lived on a gated road in a lovely big house with a

> lovely big garden that would be great. People

> living on East Dulwich Grove in flat with no

> garden have to put up with noise and pollution for

> over four hours a day, while other residents have

> only local traffic.. it stinks of inequality.


This.

Is there an East Dulwich Grove Residents Association through which to channel these issues? Personally, the changes are having a transformative and really positive impact on how my family gets about the area. However, judging from the various threads on here it seems to be mainly EDG residents that are negatively impacted by the changes in road layouts. Operating through a RA might give EDG residents a better way of working with the Council to find a solution to your specific problem? Apologies, you might already be doing this, was just a thought.

david_carnell Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Roky Erickson Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> >

> https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-8713579/F

>

> >

> ury-FIRE-ENGINE-gets-stuck-new-cycle-lane-Covid-fr

>

> > iendly-traffic-measures.html

>

> "Abi Babalola, 40, says her 10 minute school run

> now takes more than 30 minutes due to her having

> to weave her way around the streets of Brixton -

> even passing near to her home 'a number of times'

> in the process."

>

> A 10 min car journey.

>

> This is what this scheme is for. To make people

> change behaviour - stupid behaviour like this.

Unless you know this person and her family personally, I would steer clear of calling anyone stupid. For all you know she or one of her kids is disabled.

Stupid.

sim1 Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Is there an East Dulwich Grove Residents

> Association through which to channel these issues?

> Personally, the changes are having a

> transformative and really positive impact on how

> my family gets about the area. However, judging

> from the various threads on here it seems to be

> mainly EDG residents that are negatively impacted

> by the changes in road layouts. Operating through

> a RA might give EDG residents a better way of

> working with the Council to find a solution to

> your specific problem? Apologies, you might

> already be doing this, was just a thought.


When you have long, strung out roads with different housing types and ownership, it is hard to get an RA set up. My own road is pretty uniform in house style but even so the top and the bottom have very different issues.

I?m pretty confident she doesn?t have a disabled child. If she did, the report would have mentioned it.


?Person who needs to use a car to get her disabled child to school? is a much stronger line than ?person who wants to make a short local journey is inconvenienced by traffic?.


She is a good outside voice, though, because she is pretty typical of many road users who are very attached their cars. So I agree she isn?t stupid. She?s pretty normal. Sadly.

heartblock Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> https://www.peabody.org.uk/media/12948/guide-to-se

> tting-up-ra.pdf

> I thought about starting one....


I would say go for it heartblock!


Metallic, I hear what you are saying, but if something very transformative happened on my road, the first thing I would do is to discuss it with my neighbours and work out a plan between us. Yes, there might be disagreements and different opinions and people be affected in a different way, but at least everyone on the affected road will have a chance to be involved. It's a better chance to being listened to seriously than individuals being shouty on various social media channels and online forums.


The situation is obviously not black and white, I don't think it's as simple as being pro-closure or anti-closure. Personally, I think we are moving in the right direction across London, but obviously it is going to be a very long process until the traffic beast is tamed. And for EDG at a very local level, getting together as an RA would I am sure help with working together more effectively with the Council.

exdulwicher Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Included in there is a stat that residential areas have seen a 36.4% increase in traffic since the

> 1990s.


Thanks for the link, there is some intersting stuff there, especially the table showing that pollution and CO2 emissions have fallen (up to 65% for NO) despite the overall increase in traffic.


How relevant is this to Soutwark though, do you have the equivalent figures for London? From memory, I think the TFL figures show a reduction in car useage over the last 20 years rather than a 36.4% increase, despite a big increase in population. Can you comment on that?

FairTgirl Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Is there much in this data and discussion about

> the role Google Maps and sat navs have to play in

> actively sending traffic down residential roads as

> well?


It's not *really* DfT's remit to go down that route to be honest but there are countless studies and articles about the phenomenon, eg:

https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2019-11-12/navigation-apps-changed-the-politics-of-traffic


In the US in particular (where Waze is bigger than in the UK), communities have been reporting closed streets to Waze / Google on a rotating basis to try and get rid of some of the issues that it creates. You can search for it online, there are community blogs that describe it. Basically, it's the community trying to create their own LTN to counteract the issues of travel apps directing drivers off down residential roads.

slarti b Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> exdulwicher Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > Included in there is a stat that residential

> areas have seen a 36.4% increase in traffic since

> the

> > 1990s.

>

> Thanks for the link, there is some intersting

> stuff there, especially the table showing that

> pollution and CO2 emissions have fallen (up to 65%

> for NO) despite the overall increase in traffic.

>

> How relevant is this to Soutwark though, do you

> have the equivalent figures for London? From

> memory, I think the TFL figures show a reduction

> in car useage over the last 20 years rather than a

> 36.4% increase, despite a big increase in

> population. Can you comment on that?


There's a breakdown of it in this file:

https://www.gov.uk/government/statistics/road-traffic-estimates-in-great-britain-2019


It downloads as a .zip, open it up and there are 9 folders, one is called Traffic by Local Authority (TRA89)

Open that one up and there are 7 spreadsheets in there. Top one is Vehicle Miles, the ones after that are broken down by various other rankings such as Car, miles excluding Trunk Roads and so on. It takes a LOT of reading!

@ Ex Dulwicher. i have the TFL report at home and will check this evening, plus the Southwark traffic reports as well.


I am concerned that people cherry pick staistics such as a 36% increase in traffic and quote them out of context. Or in the case of the OHS consultation provide totally misleading statistics such as the 47% increase in ttraffci through DV.


also, I think you are professionally involved in traffic, what do you think of teh reduction in p;ollution shown by the DoT figures over the last 20 years?

slarti b Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> @ Ex Dulwicher. i have the TFL report at home and

> will check this evening, plus the Southwark

> traffic reports as well.

>

> I am concerned that people cherry pick staistics

> such as a 36% increase in traffic and quote them

> out of context. Or in the case of the OHS

> consultation provide totally misleading statistics

> such as the 47% increase in ttraffci through DV.

>

>

> also, I think you are professionally involved in

> traffic, what do you think of teh reduction in

> p;ollution shown by the DoT figures over the last

> 20 years?


Apologies, I wasn't intending to cherry pick to show one side or the other of any argument - as this thread is concerned with predominantly residential roads, I thought it was worth mentioning as being of relevance to that (rather than say statistics about motorway miles which obviously doesn't apply to Dulwich!).


Pollution - that's not measured directly from vehicles, it's extrapolated from vehicle miles/type, average CO2 emissions and actual roadside measurements. The problem is that actual measurements include general pollution and you then model things like "25% of it is cars" and so on.


Since overall pollution has dropped - very dramatically in places - due to factors like closure of factories / mines, cleaner engines and various weather factors, it's difficult to attribute it directly. What's in there is a series of best guesses; pages 35-39 give a series of assumptions, info around changes to methodology and statistical analysis like sample size and there's a note in there too about changes to council boundaries which often has an effect the recorded level of traffic if a borough / county gains or loses some land during a boundary change.

@exdulwicher Thanks, I will have a closer look at the pollution stats.


On the traffic increase stats, I think it is important in the context of this thread to quote stats taht are relevant to our area, or oas close as we can get. That means TFL & Southwark. To be frank I prefer TfL figures and analyis becuase they seem much more objective than Southwark.

exdulwicher Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> https://www.gov.uk/government/statistics/road-traf

> fic-estimates-in-great-britain-2019

>

> DfT stats out today for traffic.

> Included in there is a stat that residential areas

> have seen a 36.4% increase in traffic since the

> 1990s.


Could it just possibly be that congestion is caused ? and air pollution is made worse ? not by cycleways, or opening streets to pedestrians, but by too many motor vehicles?!

rahrahrah Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> exdulwicher Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> >

> https://www.gov.uk/government/statistics/road-traf

>

> > fic-estimates-in-great-britain-2019

> >

> > DfT stats out today for traffic.

> > Included in there is a stat that residential

> areas

> > have seen a 36.4% increase in traffic since the

> > 1990s.

>

> Could it just possibly be that congestion is

> caused ? and air pollution is made worse ? not by

> cycleways, or opening streets to pedestrians, but

> by too many motor vehicles?!



You wouldn't make a very good Daily Mail journalist or taxi driver would you?! ;-)

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • The is very low water pressure in the middle of Friern Road this morning.
    • I think mostly those are related to the same "issues". In my experience, it's difficult using the pin when reporting problems, especially if you're on a mobile... There's two obvious leaks in that stretch and has been for sometime one of them apparently being sewer flooding 😱  
    • BBC Homepage Skip to content Accessibility Help EFor you Notifications More menu Search BBC                     BBC News Menu   UK England N. Ireland Scotland Alba Wales Cymru Isle of Man Guernsey Jersey Local News Vets under corporate pressure to increase revenue, BBC told   Image source,Getty Images ByRichard Bilton, BBC Panorama and Ben Milne, BBC News Published 2 hours ago Vets have told BBC Panorama they feel under increasing pressure to make money for the big companies that employ them - and worry about the costly financial impact on pet owners. Prices charged by UK vets rose by 63% between 2016 and 2023, external, and the government's competition regulator has questioned whether the pet-care market - as it stands - is giving customers value for money. One anonymous vet, who works for the UK's largest vet care provider, IVC Evidensia, said that the company has introduced a new monitoring system that could encourage vets to offer pet owners costly tests and treatment options. A spokesperson for IVC told Panorama: "The group's vets and vet nurses never prioritise revenue or transaction value over and above the welfare of the animal in their care." More than half of all UK households are thought to own a pet, external. Over the past few months, hundreds of pet owners have contacted BBC Your Voice with concerns about vet bills. One person said they had paid £5,600 for 18 hours of vet-care for their pet: "I would have paid anything to save him but felt afterwards we had been taken advantage of." Another described how their dog had undergone numerous blood tests and scans: "At the end of the treatment we were none the wiser about her illness and we were presented with a bill of £13,000."   Image caption, UK pet owners spent £6.3bn on vet and other pet-care services in 2024, according to the CMA Mounting concerns over whether pet owners are receiving a fair deal prompted a formal investigation by government watchdog, the Competition and Markets Authority (CMA). In a provisional report, external at the end of last year, it identified several issues: Whether vet companies are being transparent about the ownership of individual practices and whether pet owners have enough information about pricing The concentration of vet practices and clinics in the hands of six companies - these now control 60% of the UK's pet-care market Whether this concentration has led to less market competition and allowed some vet care companies to make excess profits 'Hitting targets' A vet, who leads one of IVC's surgeries (and who does not want to be identified because they fear they could lose their job), has shared a new internal document with Panorama. The document uses a colour code to compare the company's UK-wide tests and treatment options and states that it is intended to help staff improve clinical care. It lists key performance indicators in categories that include average sales per patient, X-rays, ultrasound and lab tests. The vet is worried about the new policy: "We will have meetings every month, where one of the area teams will ask you how many blood tests, X-rays and ultrasounds you're doing." If a category is marked in green on the chart, the clinic would be judged to be among the company's top 25% of achievers in the UK. A red mark, on the other hand, would mean the clinic was in the bottom 25%. If this happens, the vet says, it might be asked to come up with a plan of action. The vet says this would create pressure to "upsell" services. Panorama: Why are vet bills so high? Are people being priced out of pet ownership by soaring bills? Watch on BBC iPlayer now or BBC One at 20:00 on Monday 12 January (22:40 in Northern Ireland) Watch on iPlayer For instance, the vet says, under the new model, IVC would prefer any animal with suspected osteoarthritis to potentially be X-rayed. With sedation, that could add £700 to a bill. While X-rays are sometimes necessary, the vet says, the signs of osteoarthritis - the thickening of joints, for instance - could be obvious to an experienced vet, who might prefer to prescribe a less expensive anti-inflammatory treatment. "Vets shouldn't have pressure to do an X-ray because it would play into whether they are getting green on the care framework for their clinic." IVC has told Panorama it is extremely proud of the work its clinical teams do and the data it collects is to "identify and close gaps in care for our patients". It says its vets have "clinical independence", and that prioritising revenue over care would be against the Royal College of Veterinary Surgeons' (RCVS) code and IVC policy. Vets say they are under pressure to bring in more money per pet   Published 15 April 2025 Vets should be made to publish prices, watchdog says   Published 15 October 2025 The vet says a drive to increase revenue is undermining his profession. Panorama spoke to more than 30 vets in total who are currently working, or have worked, for some of the large veterinary groups. One recalls being told that not enough blood tests were being taken: "We were pushed to do more. I hated opening emails." Another says that when their small practice was sold to a large company, "it was crazy... It was all about hitting targets". Not all the big companies set targets or monitor staff in this way. The high cost of treatment UK pet owners spent £6.3bn on vet and other pet-care services in 2024 - equal to just over £365 per pet-owning household, according to the CMA. However, most pet owners in the UK do not have insurance, and bills can leave less-well-off families feeling helpless when treatment is needed. Many vets used not to display prices and pet owners often had no clear idea of what treatment would cost, but in the past two years that has improved, according to the CMA. Rob Jones has told Panorama that when his family dog, Betty, fell ill during the autumn of 2024 they took her to an emergency treatment centre, Vets Now, and she underwent an operation that cost almost £5,000. Twelve days later, Betty was still unwell, and Rob says he was advised that she could have a serious infection. He was told a diagnosis - and another operation - would cost between £5,000-£8,000.   Image caption, Betty's owners were told an operation on her would cost £12,000 However, on the morning of the operation, Rob was told this price had risen to £12,000. When he complained, he was quoted a new figure - £10,000. "That was the absolute point where I lost faith in them," he says. "It was like, I don't believe that you've got our interests or Betty's interests at heart." The family decided to put Betty to sleep. Rob did not know at the time that both his local vet, and the emergency centre, branded Vets Now, where Betty was treated, were both owned by the same company - IVC. He was happy with the treatment but complained about the sudden price increase and later received an apology from Vets Now. It offered him £3,755.59 as a "goodwill gesture".   Image caption, Rob Jones says he lost faith in the vets treating his pet dog Betty Vets Now told us its staff care passionately for the animals they treat: "In complex cases, prices can vary depending on what the vet discovers during a consultation, during the treatment, and depending on how the patient responds. "We have reviewed our processes and implemented a number of changes to ensure that conversations about pricing are as clear as possible." Value for money? Independent vet practices have been a popular acquisition for corporate investors in recent years, according to Dr David Reader from the University of Glasgow. He has made a detailed study of the industry. Pet care has been seen as attractive, he says, because of the opportunities "to find efficiencies, to consolidate, set up regional hubs, but also to maximise profits". Six large veterinary groups (sometimes referred to as LVGs) now control 60% of the UK pet care market - up from 10% a decade ago, according to the CMA, external. They are: Linnaeus, which owns 180 practices Medivet, which has 363 Vet Partners with 375 practices CVS Group, which has 387 practices Pets at Home, which has 445 practices under the name Vets for Pets IVC Evidensia, which has 900 practices When the CMA announced its provisional findings last autumn, it said there was not enough competition or informed choice in the market. It estimated the combined cost of this to UK pet owners amounted to £900m between 2020-2024. Corporate vets dispute the £900m figure. They say their prices are competitive and made freely available, and reflect their huge investment in the industry, not to mention rising costs, particularly of drugs. The corporate vets also say customers value their services highly and that they comply with the RCVS guidelines.   Image caption, A CMA survey suggests pet owners are happy with the service they receive from vets A CMA survey suggests pet owners are happy with their vets - both corporate and independent - when it comes to quality of service. But, with the exception of Pets at Home, customer satisfaction on cost is much lower for the big companies. "I think that large veterinary corporations, particularly where they're owned by private equity companies, are more concerned about profits than professionals who own veterinary businesses," says Suzy Hudson-Cooke from the British Veterinary Union, which is part of Unite. Proposals for change The CMA's final report on the vet industry is expected by the spring but no date has been set for publication. In its provisional report, it proposed improved transparency on pricing and vet ownership. Companies would have to reveal if vet practices were part of a chain, and whether they had business connections with hospitals, out-of-hours surgeries, online pharmacies and even crematoria. IVC, CVS and Vet Partners all have connected businesses and would have to be more transparent about their services in the future. Pets at Home does not buy practices - it works in partnership with individual vets, as does Medivet. These companies have consistently made clear in their branding who owns their practices. The big companies say they support moves to make the industry more transparent so long as they don't put too high a burden on vets. David Reader says the CMA proposals could have gone further. "There's good reason to think that once this investigation is concluded, some of the larger veterinary groups will continue with their acquisition strategies." The CMA says its proposals would "improve competition by helping pet owners choose the right vet, the right treatment, and the right way to buy medicine - without confusion or unnecessary cost". For Rob Jones, however, it is probably too late. "I honestly wouldn't get another pet," he says. "I think it's so expensive now and the risk financially is so great.             Food Terms of Use About the BBC Privacy Policy Cookies Accessibility Help Parental Guidance Contact the BBC Make an editorial complaint BBC emails for you Copyright © 2026 BBC. The BBC is not responsible for the content of external sites. Read about our approach to external linking.
    • What does the area with the blue dotted lines and the crossed out water drop mean? No water in this area? So many leaks in the area.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...