Jump to content

Recommended Posts

there are certain things all men should be aware of when it comes to behaviour

1. Do not hang around children on your own as this may be perceived as a threat

2. Do not walk behind a single woman when it's late, even if you're going in the same direction - cross the road - this will most likely scare the hell out of her



and so on.


It's right the OP has raised her concerns, valid or not - it's better than something happening and then wishing she'd said something.


It would have been better to let a dad in the park with his kids know, maybe he could have spoken to him at the time.

Or called the police and taken a description.


Most likely nothing to worry about, but it may not have been innocent.

A lone man sitting in a park shouldn?t be a problem but sadly in this day and age it?s best to air on side of caution . Look what happened to young boy in burgess park .if it?s a bylaw he shouldn?t be there end of , plenty of places to rest elsewhere in park . Op only says she was uncomfortable which is right , we have to be aware of surroundings ,it?s some people?s comments that don?t help , I?m a older lady and wouldn?t sit in a child?s play area without kids , there is no need when plenty of places in park to be .
I know East Dulwich seems to have been taken over by young families, but as a single male I can't see the problem with this guy chilling out in a public area at all. Let the man do what he wants as long as he isn't causing any harm, or breaking any laws.

jimlad48 Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I am depressed at the attitude that single male =

> problem.

>

> I?m a childless male and occasionally meet my

> friends and their children, or my godchildren at

> the park. If I arrive early and have to wait a few

> minutes for them on my own, does that make me

> suspicious?

>

> I have friends who are stay at home Dads. If they

> go to the park and their kid runs off, while they

> wait for them, does that make them suspicious?

>

> I know people with learning challenges who are

> lovely people but may happily stand by the park

> minding their own business. Are they suspicious

> too?

>

> What makes me so cross here is that we assume

> single male = paedophile. We?d never say the same

> about a single woman, and I am 100% certain that a

> woman standing on their own in the park wouldn?t

> have aroused any suspicions or threads on EDF at

> all.

>

> You may not like the fact that he was there, but

> if he wasn?t breaking the law, and you weren?t

> prepared to call Police/Council or even

> appropriately challenge him, then that should have

> been a steer to not raise it here. People have

> committed suicide over false paedophile claims,

> and yet here you are describing someone who has,

> on the surface, done nothing wrong and where no

> evidence exists of wrongdoing, and effectively

> slandered them.



And increased the climate of fear and scaremongering for no useful end.

macutd Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> this is a really difficult situation and I feel

> very cautious about writing anything. But it seems

> very sad that an adult is seen as a pervert if

> they are standing near children playing.


This. Perhaps he's enjoying watching the kids play in an entirely innocent way. The assumption that there must be some sort of perverted sexual motive is just so sad.

Peckhampam Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Craigyboy, empathy or commonsense is needed and a

> children's' playground is not a public area


How is a playground in a park NOT a public area?? Anyone can go in or out. Not saying it wouldn't be weird if there was a guy going just to see kids at a playground, but it doesn't have to be for perverted reasons!


The point if this thread is to see if it was right to call out a guy on a public forum and suggest he could be a peodo, when in reality he's just sitting there minding his own business.


People shouldn't be so quick to judge. Your statement makes no sense at all and ridiculous.

EDBoost Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Peckhampam Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > Craigyboy, empathy or commonsense is needed and

> a

> > children's' playground is not a public area

>

> How is a playground in a park NOT a public area??

> Anyone can go in or out. Not saying it wouldn't be

> weird if there was a guy going just to see kids at

> a playground, but it doesn't have to be for

> perverted reasons!

>

> The point if this thread is to see if it was right

> to call out a guy on a public forum and suggest

> he could be a peodo, when in reality he's just

> sitting there minding his own business.

>

> People shouldn't be so quick to judge. Your

> statement makes no sense at all and ridiculous.


Because of the byelaw. I don't think the intention of the byelaw is that people who walk there maybe dangerous - it's that they make children and parents feel uncomfortable.


So many people may have many innocent reasons for being there though.

craigyboy71 Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I know East Dulwich seems to have been taken over

> by young families, but as a single male I can't

> see the problem with this guy chilling out in a

> public area at all. Let the man do what he wants

> as long as he isn't causing any harm, or breaking

> any laws.


But he was breaking the park byelaw by being in the playground without a child. He had the whole of the rest of the park to sit in!

rahrahrah Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> macutd Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > this is a really difficult situation and I feel

> > very cautious about writing anything. But it

> seems

> > very sad that an adult is seen as a pervert if

> > they are standing near children playing.

>

> This. Perhaps he's enjoying watching the kids play

> in an entirely innocent way. The assumption that

> there must be some sort of perverted sexual motive

> is just so sad.


The OP didn't make any such assumption! It was all the numpties on here accusing her of calling the man a paedophile, when all she said was that she was a bit concerned.

Some of you need to have a really hard look at yourselves with the way you become so outraged at an innocent comment that you don't appear to have read properly!

EDBoost Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Peckhampam Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > Craigyboy, empathy or commonsense is needed and

> a

> > children's' playground is not a public area

>

> How is a playground in a park NOT a public area??

> Anyone can go in or out. Not saying it wouldn't be

> weird if there was a guy going just to see kids at

> a playground, but it doesn't have to be for

> perverted reasons!

>

> The point if this thread is to see if it was right

> to call out a guy on a public forum and suggest

> he could be a peodo, when in reality he's just

> sitting there minding his own business.

>

> People shouldn't be so quick to judge. Your

> statement makes no sense at all and ridiculous.



FFS! No one knows or needs to know why he was in there. The fact is that the law states he should not be in there without a child. It really is that simple!

Upwind Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> rahrahrah Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > macutd Wrote:

> >

> --------------------------------------------------

>

> > -----

> > > this is a really difficult situation and I

> feel

> > > very cautious about writing anything. But it

> > seems

> > > very sad that an adult is seen as a pervert

> if

> > > they are standing near children playing.

> >

> > This. Perhaps he's enjoying watching the kids

> play

> > in an entirely innocent way. The assumption

> that

> > there must be some sort of perverted sexual

> motive

> > is just so sad.

>

> The OP didn't make any such assumption! It was all

> the numpties on here accusing her of calling the

> man a paedophile, when all she said was that she

> was a bit concerned.

> Some of you need to have a really hard look at

> yourselves with the way you become so outraged at

> an innocent comment that you don't appear to have

> read properly!


Agree.


This forum continues to go downhill.

KidKruger Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> "The OP didn't make any such assumption! It was

> all the numpties on here accusing her of calling

> the man a paedophile, when all she said was that

> she was a bit concerned"

>

> 'concerned' about what exactly ?

> please advise:

> 1.

> 2.

> 3. etc..

1.An

2.Adult

3.Alone

4.In

5.The

6.Playground

7.Which

8.She

9.Thought

10.Might

11.Be

12.Suspicious

Not sure why you specified the numbering system, but happy to oblige if it makes things easier to understand.

We walked home as kids, and got talking to a man in our street. He used to invite us in to look at the house he was building for himself.


One day we passed with my mother who thanked him for entertaining two 9 year olds


And the shocking thing is that all he was doing was telling us about the house he was building and nicely engaging with two curious kids.


Of course years later he wouldn't have dared talk to us at all. Things were no different to now in terms of the dangers, we were warned not to take sweets from strangers or get into stranger's cars but it is a shame that everyone gets excited without knowing the facts.


But if you see this gent do run

On a more serious note, back in the summer, an eight year old boy was abducted from the Burgess Park tennis centre changing rooms, before being subjected to a sustained serious sexual assault. Maybe if someone had noticed the man going in there without a tennis racket, sports kit, or perhaps a child, this boy could have been spared a lifetime of trauma.


Fleothecat noticed something that concerned her and thought it would be helpful to notify members of this forum so they would be aware if the man was in the playground again. It was a shame then that the content of her post, was dissected, exaggerated, then mutated out of all recognition by a braying mob of EDF morons, all fighting to be the most morally outraged/wittiest poster, when a simple "Thanks for the heads up" would have sufficed. Some of the replies amounted to nothing more than ill-informed bullying. Shameful.

I was thinking about the warnings we used to get as youngsters over strangers - it was the 1970s yet they were concerned (I remember when I said I talked to a man on the beach and didn't understand why my parents worried about it).


It's just that the prevailing thoughts at the time were children should be allowed to wander freely wherever we wanted without saying where we were going except "out".

JohnL Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

>

> It's just that the prevailing thoughts at the time

> were children should be allowed to wander freely

> wherever we wanted without saying where we were

> going except "out".


maybe in hindsight that was a bit na?ve?

How long was the OP in the area? Was she there long enough to conclude this man did not have a child of his own playing in the playground? What made her think he was a loner and up to no good?


This sort of thinking reminds me of my Mum who would quickly make a judgment on a potential boyfriend saying something like "his eyes are too close together"! The OP's reasoning and logic is as daft as my Mum's was!

pk Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> JohnL Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> >

> > It's just that the prevailing thoughts at the

> time

> > were children should be allowed to wander

> freely

> > wherever we wanted without saying where we were

> > going except "out".

>

> maybe in hindsight that was a bit na?ve?


It wasn't just people either - My sister ended up having a really nasty accident on a rope swing in what I can only describe as a sink hole nobody knew about. We all got a safety lecture off the police at the age of 10.

Upwind:

? KidKruger Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> "The OP didn't make any such assumption! It was

> all the numpties on here accusing her of calling

> the man a paedophile, when all she said was that

> she was a bit concerned"

>

> 'concerned' about what exactly ?

> please advise:

> 1.

> 2.

> 3. etc..

1.An

2.Adult

3.Alone

4.In

5.The

6.Playground

7.Which

8.She

9.Thought

10.Might

11.Be

12.Suspicious

Not sure why you specified the numbering system, but happy to oblige if it makes things easier to understand.

?

Suspicious of what ?

Suspected of what ?

I get that it's a public area and people have the right to be where they want to be......but if you're a 20 something man without a kid, WHY would you want to be in the playground? Furthermore, if you're only interested in watching the kids have fun and play, there is a bench directly outside the gated playground area. It attracts suspicion. Regardless of whether you're innocently there or not. You're inviting this sort of attention.


As a very recently former 20 something childless guy...what reason do I have to be there? It solely being a public park is pretty weak at best.


On the other hand. The original poster doesn't give enough for me to be convinced that this person may not have had a child somewhere in the playground. My biggest fear as a father is the inevitable day when someone assumes I'm not the parent of my child because of the way I look.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Gone to the better hunting grounds during this local ongoing dry spell.
    • The Dreamliner has an impeccable service history, you are more likely to get mugged on the way to the airport than having any issue with your flight, that's how safe it is!  Have a great trip.
    • Maybe. Does that kill grass? If so, possibly the same dog that has left its poo outside my house - pretty sure it's not fox poo.
    • Here you are, intexasatthemoment (you seem to have been in Texas for a very long time!) We went to three of the recommended places yesterday,  as they were all in the same road (just near Wallington)  and I needed to give the car a run to avoid another slap on the wrist from my garage (and another new battery). Here's my findings. BARNES Parking We thought we would go here first as it was the earliest to close on a Sunday (3pm). There was no apparent entrance or anywhere to park. One notice said do not park on grass verge, and another one said staff cars only! Flittons was opposite but I'd already passed the entrance, so I had to drive down the road, turn round at the next available place (covered in signs saying do not park here) and park in Flittons car park! Plants Barnes  specialise in hardy perennials, so that was basically what they had, but an excellent selection, and many more unusual plants (or at least, plants you probably wouldn't find in a garden centre), eg Corydalis,  lots of different varieties of Epimediums, Trollius, some lovely Phygelius, lots of different ferns). The plants were divided into sections according to whether they needed sun or shade or could cope with both. They had a particularly good selection of  shade loving plants. There was really useful information above  each group of plants, which meant you didn't have to look at individual labels. All the plants looked in good health and  very well cared for. They don't produce a printed catalogue, but they  said their plant list was online (I haven't looked yet). I assume most of  the plants they have at any one time are when it's their flowering season (if they flower). I wasn't intending to buy anything, though was very tempted, but I'd definitely go here again once I've sorted out my overgrown garden. Other Stuff Don't think they sell pots, compost, etc. No cafe/tea room and I didn't see a loo, but Flittons is just over the road. FLITTONS  Parking Easy to park Plants Sorry, but mostly terrible. There was one section with vegetables and the rest was flowering plants. There was a general feeling of delapidation. Some of what was on display was actually dead (surely it would only take a minute to remove dead plants) and a lot of the rest was very poorly maintained, eg gone to seed, weedy, apparently unwatered, or with a lot of dead leaves. There was a notice asking for volunteers to work there, so I can only assume they can't afford to pay staff. Other stuff There was a notice to a play barn (?) saying invited people only, so I think they must host kids' parties or something. They redeemed themselves with a cosy little cafe with savoury stuff, nice cakes, iced chai and oat milk, and a loo. Also a selection of books and CDs on sale for charity. If you want an Andrews Sisters CD, you can find one here. There is a small shop with gift shop type stuff and a display of the history of Flittons, which apparently is family owned since the sixties (I think it was). I suspect that the arrival of Dobbies down the road must have greatly affected Flittons' fortunes, which is sad. DOBBIES  Parking Easy in theory once you had navigated a rather narrow entrance, but it was very busy so it took a while to find a space. Plants  Lots of plants, well maintained but I imagine their turnover is high. Lots of nice bedding plants for hanging baskets, window boxes etc  to cater for all tastes (ie some of it wasn't mine, but fine if you like those horrid little begonias (my opinion only) but they did have some nice (in my opinion) stuff as well. I was tempted but decided to buy from North Cross Road market. Fair selection of climbers, various different Clematis etc. I'd be happy to buy plants from here. The prices seemed reasonable and they were in good condition. Other stuff  It's a big garden centre with all that entails these days, so a large area selling garden furniture and storage, tools, animal collars, pots, all the usual stuff you would expect. Very helpful staff. There's a cafe which we didn't check out, charging points for electric cars, a Waitrose (no idea how big, we didn't look). Only on our way out did we see that there was a drive through "express section" for compost etc, which was annoying as I wanted compost and hadn't seen any anywhere,  but I was getting tired by that time. Just Down the Road A ten minute drive away is Wilderness Island, a nature reserve in Carshalton, which is well worth a visit. We heard eleven different kinds of bird (according to Merlin) and saw a Kingfisher flying down the tiny river!
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...