Jump to content

Trams incl. Dog Kennel Hill


dbboy

Recommended Posts

Interesting information about how trams used to run across London including up/down Dog kennel Hill, see link below.


https://londonmodeltramways.webs.com/dogkennelhillhistory.htm


https://londonmodeltramways.webs.com/dogkennelhillmodel.htm


https://www.google.com/search?q=trams+dog+kennel+hill&rlz=1C1AOHY_en-GBGB708GB708&oq=trams+dog+kennel+hill&aqs=chrome..69i57j0.8367j0j7&sourceid=chrome&ie=UTF-8


Does anyone have any information about where the name Dog Kennel Hill originates from?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

dbboy Wrote:

-----------------------------

>

> Does anyone have any information about where the

> name Dog Kennel Hill originates from?


From a London history website:


One theory for the name is that Prince George of Denmark had kennels for his hounds here. However, Edward Alleyn, the Elizabethan actor, owned much of what was, at the time, the manor of Dulwich and some of the land here was recorded as Kennels, Kennoldes Croft and Kennold?s Acre. That means a more likely theory is that an earlier landowner (date unknown), one Monsieur de Canel, resided there, and Dog Kennel is a heavily anglicized version of his name.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

fishbiscuits Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> And speaking of long-gone transport

> infrastructure... Lordship Lane station. Of course

> you can still see some of the old route and tunnel

> in Dulwich woods.


There's some lovely old photos and a painting of Lordship Lane station, the old platforms and so on here: http://www.disused-stations.org.uk/l/lordship_lane/


Further hill name etymology on this website which seems a bit more comprehensive than the link I'd found earlier

https://londonist.com/2016/04/how-london-s-hills-got-their-names

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • I would suggest that anyone accidentally driving into the square is not paying due care and attention. If you disagree, I would be interested in what you consider a basic level of competence behind the wheel. Are you a member or a ‘subscriber’? Is there a difference. Does anyone know?  Who is alleging there has been pressure put on the emergency services (not you, you’re just neutrally posting ‘updates’ 😂). It is all very transparent and accountable isn’t it 🤣  
    • Yes, but as I have said before I have nothing to do with their organisation (other than subscribing to their updates which I then post on here). Sorry to disappoint you. I await your answers....
    • Hold on a minute, aren’t you the one posting regular updates from ‘One Dulwich’? 
    • No idea. Ask One Dulwich   No. There are two seperate issues. I believe some cover their plates deliberately (delivery drivers etc) and a number are confused by signage. I spend a lot of time in that area and have only ever seen one car drive through and it was an elderly couple who were incredibly confused (and subsequently very apologetic to an angry cyclist who was calling them all the names under the sun).   Some questions for you to answer now: 1) Which consultation are you referring to? 2) Did you agree with the council's insistence on keeping the junction closed to emergency vehicles despite the emergency services telling them it was delaying response times?   3) At a time of funding crisis do you think £1.5m is a good spend to redesign a junction and those redesigns: - potentially increase emergency vehicle response times - do nothing to stop persistent number plate covering offenders - do nothing to slow cyclists at a pedestrian area  
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...