Jump to content

Recommended Posts

I have facebook and I am quite addicted.

Sorry, it keeps me amused when I am at work and the little one is napping and I take over my bosses apple mac and trace family in far off places and stalk old work mates and ex boyfriends.


Beside everyone likes to be a vampire!

fine I guess I wont b stalking any of you on it now then *sighs*


There was a time when it was fairly addictive but that really was when I was trying to relocate ppl and I have to say thanks to me a lot of other ppl who have lost touch have been reunited. It does get boring wiv all the apps and stuff VERY quickly tho :|

It's all part of a campaign to being less passive. I've also decided to text much less and to phone instead, even if I get an ansaphone. Also, I didn't have 72 friends at all. I had 72 people who I know at least somewhat, on a scale of pass in the office once a fortnight to sleep with on a daily basis. Sure, I've made contact with some people, but all I've done is exchange a couple of hastily typed paragraphs with them. I'm partly responsible for not taking it further, I know, but there's an awful lot of fakeness about Facebook (Fakebook, anyone?). Nero

Nero Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I've deactivated my account. Was sick of its basic

> inanity. I've got a phone, a mobile, two email

> accounts and a house address , so I think I'll be

> OK. Anyone else care to join me? Nero



Already have Nero! Came off Crackbook within two weeks of registering.

Apparently there is no way of deleting your records from Facebook though, you are just shown as having logged off and the moment, even months later, even if you check in you will find your account, as well as all your details will still be recorded on there, the only thing is then the minute you log back on a message is sent to all your contacts telling them you are back on line. Once you have signed up there is NO WAY of cancelling the account or taking your details off, it just goes into hibernation, so best to limit your personal and privacy settings to the minimum.
Sorry should have read the other posts properly, (guilty of jumping the gun) you already know can't be deactivated, sorry,if I'd only known that I would not have bothered, only wanted a look and had to open an account to do so, wanted to see what all the fuss was about.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • It’s a 4 year old on a bike do you really think he is going 15mph. Grown adults complaining about a child who probably isn’t able to string a few sentences together says a lot about the people in this forum. If this member was hit from behind the father was probably walking behind the bike so I don’t get the point of stretching out an overreaction from a child in Nursery bumping into you. Grow up Obviously a four year old should be cycling on the pavement.
    • Malumbu,  if none of us were there, does that mean that nobody should post anything on here unless they have witnesses from the EDF? Why would someone post something like this if it  wasn't true? This is not about whether children should or should not be cycling on the pavement. There are specific issues. a) the child was out of sight of the person supposed to be caring for him b) he appears to have been  either not looking where he was going or was out of control of the bike c) if he did see that he was about to hit someone  he apparently did not give them any kind of warning  d)  a person was unexpectedly hit from behind whilst just walking along, which in my view makes him a victim e) does the title of the thread really matter as the issue was described in the first post?  f) nobody is blaming the child, they are blaming the person who should have been watching him g) do you really think it was acceptable for that person to find the situation funny? The OP was not complaining about the 4 year old. They were complaining about an adult's lack of supervision of a 4 year old who was not capable of riding a bike and who hit someone from behind with no warning. Also, apart from reading the OP more carefully, perhaps also choose your words more carefully. Jobless? Lunatic? Charming.
    • Completely jobless and lunatic behaviour coming on a forum and complaining about a 4 year old and the child’s bike riding skills. Honestly grow up
    • I have to say, I too am upset about the passing of DulwichFox. He was a real local character, who unlike me, managed to stick with ED despite all of the nauseous yuppification of the last three decades. R.I.P to foxy    Louisa. 
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...