Jump to content

Recommended Posts

All the best Rose in your new venture. I was unable to pop into your store on Saturday to say goodbye so I hope you are reading this! You were always polite and friendly to me and my twin girls when we came into your store. I can't wait to see what your going to bring to East Dulwich. A little birdie told me residents around here won't be let down...
In response to Wee Quinnie, I was refering to what JoJobaby said above in the thread. I have no idea if Rose is linked to this apparent new venture. Sorry if what I wrote may above misled you or anyone else following this thread. Once again, I wish Rose nothing but the best in whatever she's doing!

Rose has another lovely shop in Hastings. Much larger, full of lovely home things, vintage, shabby French chic.

I've gone for days trips with my family many times and never fail to bring something

Back from her store. She said to me months ago she would

Let the east Dulwich store go.

Visit her in Hastings, you'll not be able to leave.

I talked to Rose about a month ago and she said that although it was so very sad she would have to let the shop go as the rents had gone up so much and the independent feel of ED was going... The Hastings shop is where her heart is now... she also hinted that she thought there would be more closures on North Cross road due to rents being doubled almost in past few years.. How sad for all of us who love that area of ED

cidered Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> So? Do we know what the new shop is going to be?


Yes, but will wait for a formal annoucement


I would hazard a guess that it may not exactly be welcomed by some other NCR & environs business

" It is very sad. Really hope that ED doesn't end up just another clone town. Wasn't so long ago that the prospect of Neros on LL generated protest, now there are people calling for chains to come here. I don't get it."


Typical, people rush in to an area, push the prices sky high, landlords run their hands in glee, independents move because they can't afford to stay.

Its much more complex than that. Most less-advantaged areas are not filled with wonderful independent shops. Chains are usually cheaper than independents and poorer areas often suffer from lots of vacant shops. Independent shops need a certain amount of affluence to exist. The high rents are a by-product of a successful high-street with limited vacancies and lots of foot-fall.



Otta Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> " It is very sad. Really hope that ED doesn't end

> up just another clone town. Wasn't so long ago

> that the prospect of Neros on LL generated

> protest, now there are people calling for chains

> to come here. I don't get it."

>

> Typical, people rush in to an area, push the

> prices sky high, landlords run their hands in

> glee, independents move because they can't afford

> to stay.

I know what you mean but most chains need to operate on a scale quite a bit larger than the shops that exist in ED. With the new SPD up for discussion, there is a good chance we as a community can decide to block over-development of shops which will likely result in most (though not all) shops remaining independent stores. Still, pricier boutiques will replace the current shops as has already been happening for the past 5 years. In the end, as the area becomes more affluent the best you can hope for if you keep things small scale is something akin to Barnes shopping areas (pricy but still fairly independent).


I?m torn as at the end of the day, I'm not sure that's much better than chains. I like the independent shops personally but when I talk to my in-laws who live on a tighter budget, they get really annoyed when large store planning applications are blocked as they prefer the cheaper prices and convenience of superstores. They grew up with having to visit the butcher and the fishmonger and baker separately and are distinctly less romantic about the whole thing and find it a waste of time. It?s a kind of luxury to be able to support a high street like LL.

I didn't say blocking the chains as such, which I agree is not likely (and I don't think blocking specific businesses should be allowed anyhow). However, the SPD can determine planning requirements for LL specifically within Southwark. The SPD is determined with the community and if its agreed that shops cannot expand their footprint, many chains won't be able to move it as currently the premises are too small for their business models. This will maintain the character of the shopping area (small-scale / villagey) even if the mix of shops changes. It?s just a by-product that it will probably prevent certain chains from entering.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Would wholeheartedly recommend Aria. Quality work, very responsive, lovely guy as well. 
    • A positive update from Southwark Council - “We are currently updating our Enforcement Policy and changes will allow for the issuing of civil penalties ranging from £175 to £300 for visible smoke emissions, replacing the previous reliance on criminal prosecution.“  
    • A solicitor is acting as the executor for our late Aunt's will.  He only communicates by letter which is greatly lengthening the process.  The vast majority of legal people deal by modern means - the Electronic Communications Act that allows for much, if not all of these means is now 25 years old.   Any views and advice out there? In fuller detail: The value of the estate is not high.  There are a number of beneficiaries including one in the US.  It has taken almost three years and there is no end in sight.  The estate (house) is now damp, mouldy and wall paper falling off the wall. The solicitor is hostile, has threatened beneficiaries the police (which would just waste the police's time), and will not engage constructively. He only communicates by letter.  These are poorly written, curt or even hostile, in a language from the middle of last century, he clearly is typing these himself probably on a type writer.  Of course with every letter he makes more money. We've taken the first steps to complain either through the ombudsman and/or the SRA.  We have taken legal advice a couple of times, which of course isn't cheap, and were told that his behaviour is shocking and we'd be in our right to have him removed through the courts. But.... we just want him to get on with executing the will, primarily selling the house. However he refuses to use any other form of communication but letter.  So writing to the beneficiary in the 'States can take a month to get a reply. And even in this country a week or more. Having worked with lawyers in the past I am aware that email, tele and video conferencing and even text and WhatApp are appropriate means for communication.  There could be an immediate response to his questions.   Help!        
    • Labour should be applauded for bringing in the Renter's Rights Act.  But so many of you are carried away with slagging them off. Married couples with busy lives sometimes forget who did what. On this occasion Mr Rachel Reeves was sorting out the rental agreement.  Ms Reeves was a bit flumoxed with all the grief/demonsing/witch hunts she is getting so forgot to check with her other half.   Not the first or last time this will happen with couples. (That's not having a go at the post above)
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...