Jump to content

Recommended Posts

All the best Rose in your new venture. I was unable to pop into your store on Saturday to say goodbye so I hope you are reading this! You were always polite and friendly to me and my twin girls when we came into your store. I can't wait to see what your going to bring to East Dulwich. A little birdie told me residents around here won't be let down...
In response to Wee Quinnie, I was refering to what JoJobaby said above in the thread. I have no idea if Rose is linked to this apparent new venture. Sorry if what I wrote may above misled you or anyone else following this thread. Once again, I wish Rose nothing but the best in whatever she's doing!

Rose has another lovely shop in Hastings. Much larger, full of lovely home things, vintage, shabby French chic.

I've gone for days trips with my family many times and never fail to bring something

Back from her store. She said to me months ago she would

Let the east Dulwich store go.

Visit her in Hastings, you'll not be able to leave.

I talked to Rose about a month ago and she said that although it was so very sad she would have to let the shop go as the rents had gone up so much and the independent feel of ED was going... The Hastings shop is where her heart is now... she also hinted that she thought there would be more closures on North Cross road due to rents being doubled almost in past few years.. How sad for all of us who love that area of ED

cidered Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> So? Do we know what the new shop is going to be?


Yes, but will wait for a formal annoucement


I would hazard a guess that it may not exactly be welcomed by some other NCR & environs business

" It is very sad. Really hope that ED doesn't end up just another clone town. Wasn't so long ago that the prospect of Neros on LL generated protest, now there are people calling for chains to come here. I don't get it."


Typical, people rush in to an area, push the prices sky high, landlords run their hands in glee, independents move because they can't afford to stay.

Its much more complex than that. Most less-advantaged areas are not filled with wonderful independent shops. Chains are usually cheaper than independents and poorer areas often suffer from lots of vacant shops. Independent shops need a certain amount of affluence to exist. The high rents are a by-product of a successful high-street with limited vacancies and lots of foot-fall.



Otta Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> " It is very sad. Really hope that ED doesn't end

> up just another clone town. Wasn't so long ago

> that the prospect of Neros on LL generated

> protest, now there are people calling for chains

> to come here. I don't get it."

>

> Typical, people rush in to an area, push the

> prices sky high, landlords run their hands in

> glee, independents move because they can't afford

> to stay.

I know what you mean but most chains need to operate on a scale quite a bit larger than the shops that exist in ED. With the new SPD up for discussion, there is a good chance we as a community can decide to block over-development of shops which will likely result in most (though not all) shops remaining independent stores. Still, pricier boutiques will replace the current shops as has already been happening for the past 5 years. In the end, as the area becomes more affluent the best you can hope for if you keep things small scale is something akin to Barnes shopping areas (pricy but still fairly independent).


I?m torn as at the end of the day, I'm not sure that's much better than chains. I like the independent shops personally but when I talk to my in-laws who live on a tighter budget, they get really annoyed when large store planning applications are blocked as they prefer the cheaper prices and convenience of superstores. They grew up with having to visit the butcher and the fishmonger and baker separately and are distinctly less romantic about the whole thing and find it a waste of time. It?s a kind of luxury to be able to support a high street like LL.

I didn't say blocking the chains as such, which I agree is not likely (and I don't think blocking specific businesses should be allowed anyhow). However, the SPD can determine planning requirements for LL specifically within Southwark. The SPD is determined with the community and if its agreed that shops cannot expand their footprint, many chains won't be able to move it as currently the premises are too small for their business models. This will maintain the character of the shopping area (small-scale / villagey) even if the mix of shops changes. It?s just a by-product that it will probably prevent certain chains from entering.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • bizarre responses from everyone but Cancerian 🤷🏾‍♀️ As an LL resident surely a perfectly normal enquiry in that one might wish to know who to look out for if lawless/feral kids are wreaking havoc? any distinguishing marks on the perpetrators? presumably the objection is that a physical description might reveal the alleged culprits as non-white? (nothing else makes sense with this bourgeois over-sensitivity). same botched thinking that causes police descriptions of suspects on the loose to omit this info  (top way to protect the public / solve the crime) FYI i'm a mixed-race female and interested in THE TRUTH. hence, i want to protect myself & my family against criminals. so please DESCRIBE the physical appearance of criminals or suspected criminals to help to keep us safe. thankyou.  "underlying agenda... strange" 😂😂😂 strange agenda to wish to be safe in my community. well played 🤯   working the nightshift here & getting mildly obsessed/infuriated with the peculiar responses. someone please explain how wishing to be able to attempt to identify, physically, the perpetrator(s) of an alleged local assault is "strange", with an "agenda"? God help us. (wait... "God"? must be a far-right religious maniac) "Unless there were distinctive features such as unusual clothing, how is that going to identify them"... green & purple mohican with accompanying buffalo 🦬 horns through the nose might do it; or simply hairstyle, skin colour, sartorial outfit... 🤔 "and even if it did, what would be the point, without photographic evidence that they had done anything wrong?" eyewitness reports? 😏    
    • Unless they were wearing school uniform with name tags otherwise children do change their clothes you know. 
    • I'd also recommend Silvano for anyone in the area looking to learn automatic, having just passed first time with 5 minors. He's a very patient teacher and ensured I learned how to drive safely above all. 
    • You don't need to do the research. I had to know the numbers as a TV buyer. I analysed the potential advertising revenue and Channel Four didn't cover their costs. They had some nice 'Channel Four' signs when someone hit the ropes but, In all honesty, a lot a potential revenue was lost because most old knackers were pissed off because they couldn't perve at Carol Vorderman on 'Countdown'.       Sorry, cross-post. I was replying to Malumbu. Give me a minute, if you will. I listened to the first two sessions (today) on TMS and popped down to the pub for the evening one.   I do miss the days of Peter West, Richie Benaud and Tom Graveney on BBC2.   But, the BBC are at least putting on 'Today At The Test' on at around 7pm instead of after midnight.   And it was on the 10pm news.      
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...