Jump to content

Recommended Posts

updated post.

Cemeteries are now open except for when services are occurring. As Camberwell New is in use Monday-Saturday,it is only open to the public on Sundays. Camberwell Old and Nunhead are open daily except for services for which they will be closed for general access. They will open at lunchtime following morning interments and will open in the afternoon after afternoon funerals.


Renata

The regulations, as they stand, refer only to the closure of crematoria. It is stated that clarification is being sought on whether the closure also applies to burial grounds. I wonder if you know, Renata, if this clarification has been obtained?

(edited)


The virus is an unfolding national tragedy but that should not mean public authorities making up the law as they go along, as we've sadly seen with certain police forces. That brings the law into disrepute and hinders the widespread compliance for a long time that we are likely to need to flatten the peak, rather than just move it back a few weeks.


Last week's Health Protection (Coronavirus, Restrictions) (England) Regulations 2020 do not apply to cemeteries (just crematoriums) and even make an exception to the ban on gatherings for funerals: http://www.legislation.gov.uk/uksi/2020/350/regulation/5/made


There is no particular health risk from a funeral, so long as you keep at least 2m, which is new guidance issued today advises families of the bereaved to keep funerals small: https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/covid-19-guidance-for-care-of-the-deceased/guidance-for-care-of-the-deceased-with-suspected-or-confirmed-coronavirus-covid-19

In any event the burial grounds locally are very large with much of their area without space for new plots. And surely most people would now of all times leave space for people to grieve.


The cemeteries have been far quieter than parks and tranquil places for quiet reflection in these difficult times. Today I found Nunhead Cemetery closed so for the first time went into Brockley Cemetery which was lovely with bluebells out.

Renata - could you please post a copy of the government directive to local authorities to close cemeteries.

The only justification I have been referred to by a council officer relates only to crematoria, as has already been stated by others on here.

I'd like to understand why the council has taken this step, as cemeteries are not even mentioned in the Regulations and it makes no sense to close cemeteries while leaving parks open.

kiera - "...cemeteries are not even mentioned in the Regulations and it makes no sense to close cemeteries while leaving parks open."

This was my point earlier in the thread, ie. where is the sense in closing cemeteries across the borough when it flies in the face of parks needing to be open for people's well-being?

No-one is saying cemeteries are parks, but for Nunhead cemetery specifically, it's massively utilised by those needing space rather than grieving/visiting graves.

I don't know about the detail of regulation, but reducing outside spaces in the most infected borough in the UK seems like a strategy aimed at trying to spread the disease (not saying it is), when inevitably the people trying to get out each day can only utilise the remaining open space.

As a matter of statutory interpretation, the legislation only closes crematoriums not burial grounds:

"5(8) A person who is responsible for a crematorium or burial ground must ensure that, during the emergency period, the crematorium is closed to members of the public, except for funerals or burials." [see ref in my msg above]

And as a matter of public health, the cemeteries locally are less risk of transmission than the overcrowded parks.


Despite this, Southwark has just sent an email to residents (COVID-19: an update for residents (1 April)), which ends on this subject:

"Cemeteries and crematoriums


In line with national government legislation during this emergency period, we have closed all of our cemeteries and our crematorium grounds, to all but those attending funerals. This will make the areas safer for grieving family and friends, at an incredibly difficult time, as well as maintain public safety. We will also be limiting the number of people able to attend funerals to 10, in an approach consistent with other boroughs. We know how sensitive these matters are, but must follow public health advice and discourage large gatherings, to help protect our residents from COVID-19."


Southwark's claim it's being consistent with other boroughs simply does not accord with reality, e.g.:

https://www.lambeth.gov.uk/bereavement-services/changes-due-to-coronavirus

"We suggest that you do not visit the cemetery or crematoria grounds during this time unless you are attending a funeral but if you do please observe social distancing and take any litter home with you.


Currently, cemetery grounds are open to the public during the normal advertised hours."

Renata Hamvas Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Due to a government directive that was

> issued last night to local authorities,

> all cemeteries are closed until further

> notice. This will therefore be applying

> to all Southwark Cemeteries and to

> those in other boroughs too.


Where can we see this directive?

I assume there's various reasons


Not essential place to go during current crisis

Council staff will have been cut down to prevent spread so physical opening/closing will be affected

There will be increase in funerals

difficult to look after from police perspective

It could be cynical if the scenario was that they reduce services taxpayers pay for instead of reducing payments to councillors or pay rises to those implementing the service reductions etc - that's one hypothetical. there are otherse
The government directive is about avoiding crowds, so cremations have to be attended by immediate family only, and ideally those sharing the household only. No attended services. No burials either, I think, except for Moslems and I think orthodox Jews for whom cremation is not religiously acceptable. This is about avoiding crowds at ceremonies. As most 'gardening' work in cemeteries can be undertaken (sorry) with full social distancing there is no reason to stop that, I would have thought. Our local cemeteries are all small parks, but with a surprising number of paths (to get to all the grave sites) and hence a lot of walking space to allow social distancing. Many more paths per area than in a 'normal' park, in fact. Closing them is all about social control - like the Derbyshire Police drones - and not actually about social distancing. It's quite a Stalinist approach - so no surprises there.

I think this is a disgrace. Poorly thought out and reactionary. Locals rely on these spaces and they are identified as valuable open spaces within Southwarks own Open Space strategy. During these tough times safe occasional exercise by residents, utilising all the available open spaces locally is vitally important. Simply because we don?t want everyone crowded into the last remaining parks(!)

Even if there will be increased burials this can surely be managed.

Currently the new cemetery is being policed by a council worker. Due to there being no signage people are walking into the recreational field adjoining and then finding themselves trapped by heras fencing/ padlocks / rope at all the normal exit points(!) the only northern exit point is via a very narrow long path - which is increasing risk to locals.


In summary nonsensical and poorly actioned.


Southwark please sort this out - and give the locals their access back. Even in part would be appreciated - perhaps during certain hours at least?

Renata, in light of the post by SIssi81 could you please act to ensure that access to Honor Oak Recreation Ground is restored and maintained as soon as possible. It appears that some Council staff may be trying to use the current situation to unlawfully close it to the public.

The below statement on the FONC site

https://www.fonc.org.uk/component/content/article/93-nunhead-cemetery-closed.html

links to this

https://www.iccm-uk.com/iccm/wp-content/library/Joint%20Statement%20on%20Coronavirus%20Act%202020.pdf

the only relevant part of is

"Clarification is currently being sought on if this same requirement to close applies to burial grounds."


So no doubt waiting on that clarification

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Community payback already exists   https://www.gov.uk/community-sentences/community-payback
    • Thanks for that - none  of mine  have been Mordena - whilst vulnerable cat, think I will just take my chances… Will be having flu though - certainly not by choice - much prefer not to but in vulnerable group.. Avoided them until last year…. Luck of drawer if you are as sick as fog  or just sore arm … assume - god knows - that flu jab is same throughout country.       
    • Wow, that is what it costs for one prisoner. So they get full board and lodging, 24 hour  monitoring  in over populated prison, we are led to believe, minimum exercise, assume a tv in each cell provided - in USA it is together with wash hand basin and c toilet - some have showers as well.   Clearly this amount of money takes  into account overstretched and overworked prison officers, protection for them, counselling which is, in my opinion a bare minimum dealing with prisoners in all settings. Do if Sweden can look outside the box, why can’t we? Or are we just not bothered at all / read statistics some where that reoffending is normal and to be frank, with economy as it is at the moment re employment, cost of living and homelessness..not surprised they reoffend to get back inside - food provided, roof over your head - much better than street living, mixing with wrong crowd, trying to get roof over your head, find a job where 90 % won’t employ you as been inside..
    • @beansprout The Swedes seem to have a useful strategy with regard to offenders  which has reduced repeat offending.  I agree that prison time for minor offences is a complete waste of time. Even worse is that prisons are "colleges of crime" where inmates learn about how to be do crimes and worst of all, become exposed to drug taking. I wouldn't advocate having chain gangs as in the USA but some strategy for getting them into say manual work under supervision might be useful - especially if it came with a modest wag. This would be significantly cheaper than the £51,100 it costs per year for  keeping one in jail.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...