Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Jules-and-Boo Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I know, I saw adults in the park too.

>

> Why are people just NOT getting the message?



Because there has not been a sufficiently clear and coordinated public information campaign which tells people not just what they must and mustn't do, but also exactly WHY.

Peckhampam Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Sue

> I have to disagree. What you can do and why has

> been repeated ad infinitum on all

> telecommunications channels. But some people just

> don't think it applies to them.

Yes Peckhampam is right. Every time I see a group of teens TOGETHER- they are the same age and obviously come from different households. They are putting themselves and their own families at risk. Their parents probably lost control of them some time ago and they will do just as they please. The public information is CRYSTAL clear....but as I read on a blog or post from a father- '24/7 parenting is impossible.'

who parents the irresponsible adults who are out?


Every time I see a group of adults together - who clearly do NOT live together, I want to call the police or their parents. but at their age, they should certainly know better. They are not setting a good example to our young people.

The information on what to do is crystal clear, yes.


I disagree that it is clear as to exactly why, for example that somebody can transmit the virus to many others whilst showing no symptoms whatsoever themselves.


And also the exponential nature of the transmission, and how that changes if one person initially transmits the virus to two, or to ten, and so on and so on.


It certainly wasn't clear on the government information I got with the letter from Boris.


If people don't understand the reasons why they are being asked to do things, they are less likely to do them, I would have thought.

I suppose it's only people who have lost a job and have to beg for some money from the government to live on, have to queue for an hour to buy food, need to pause your mortgage or rent payments and other debt, see family members in quarantine, have to home school your children... even if you didn't understand the reason for social isolation, you'd realise it was bloody serious.


If you're not directly impacted by any of these things, you'd need to have it explained to you in a different way. And clearly that isn't happening.

I don't know how to link a discussion thread properly......but please see this thread about teenagers in the Lounge section. Teenagers are targeted often but I don't want to repeat my response


https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/forum/read.php?20,2108537


(Oh, looks like I've worked it out!)

That, exactly Binkylilyput.


Thanks for posting the link.


Don't let your fear of our teens make you forget they are extremely vulnerable.

They are too poor to move out if they need to be safe and have no control over their home environment.


If they were happy and safe at home, you can bet your bottom dollar that that is where they would be.

worldwiser Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I suppose it's only people who have lost a job and

> have to beg for some money from the government to

> live on, have to queue for an hour to buy food,

> need to pause your mortgage or rent payments and

> other debt, see family members in quarantine, have

> to home school your children... even if you didn't

> understand the reason for social isolation, you'd

> realise it was bloody serious.

>

> If you're not directly impacted by any of these

> things, you'd need to have it explained to you in

> a different way. And clearly that isn't happening.



No, it doesn't seem to be.

Sue Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> The information on what to do is crystal clear,

> yes.

>

> I disagree that it is clear as to exactly why, for

> example that somebody can transmit the virus to

> many others whilst showing no symptoms whatsoever

> themselves.

>

> And also the exponential nature of the

> transmission, and how that changes if one person

> initially transmits the virus to two, or to ten,

> and so on and so on.

>

> It certainly wasn't clear on the government

> information I got with the letter from Boris.

>

> If people don't understand the reasons why they

> are being asked to do things, they are less likely

> to do them, I would have thought.


Yes I suppose that accounts for the number of people who use a public toilet and don't wash their hands....

I don't believe there are many out there including teens, who don't know what's going on especially since Primark is shut etc

I was speaking to my sister yesterday who is a business owner, (many people all different age groups use her store) she's not that often opinionated but yesterday she was.

She is getting angry (yes that's the word she used) at seeing teenagers/youngsters hanging out together instead of isolating.

I was quite chilled about it & thought well if they've got nowhere to go then good luck to them, if they get ill it's their problem (as well as the NHS' of course)

She weren't having it.

As she quite rightly put it if there ar elderly/vulnerable people in a hospital & they have to make a choice as to who's life should be saved, they'd no doubt choose the youngsters!

So yes people unnecessarily going out are putting other people's lives at risk & not realising.


Tbh I wasn't thinking on that level, but when she put it to to me..... Well what can I say

I think we have to remember here, what is it like to be a teenager. You feel invincible at that age right? And death is something that happens to old people right? We live in a western culture where most people do not die before their time. This is very different to parts of the world where people frequently die from the impacts of poor hygiene, poor sanitation, and poor healthcare. In many ways, our first world sanitation is our downfall. We live in a bubble where the very idea of an unseen microscopic virus upending our way of life is an anathema.


So that poses a question that is as much about culture as it is about science. How do we impress on that minority of teens and adults alike who think they are not part of the risk? The good news is that they are a minority. The bad news is that it only takes one infected person to cause havoc with this virus. I don't have the answers either sadly, but if we are to change those minority mindsets, we need to be clever about it. It is about winning the argument.

If teenagers today are anything I was like as a teenager, then they will automatically want to do the opposite of what they?re told. They are learning about life and testing authority. Just ranting about their behaviour and complaining about their parents won?t help, the problem needs to be articulated to them in a different way. I don?t have the answer to this by the way!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Post much better this Xmas.  Sue posted about whether they send Xmas cards; how good the post is,  is relevant.  Think I will continue to stay off Instagram!
    • These have reduced over the years, are "perfect" lives Round Robins being replaced by "perfect" lives Instagram posts where we see all year round how people portray their perfect lives ?    The point of this thread is that for the last few years, due to issues at the mail offices, we had delays to post over Christmas. Not really been flagged as an issue this year but I am still betting on the odd card, posted well before Christmas, arriving late January. 
    • Two subjects here.  Xmas cards,  We receive and send less of them.  One reason is that the cost of postage - although interestingly not as much as I thought say compared to 10 years ago (a little more than inflation).  Fun fact when inflation was double digits in the 70s cost of postage almost doubled in one year.  Postage is not a good indication of general inflation fluctuating a fair bit.  The huge rise in international postage that for a 20g Christmas card to Europe (no longer a 20g price, now have to do up to 100g), or a cheapskate 10g card to the 'States (again have to go up to the 100g price) , both around a quid in 2015, and now has more than doubled in real terms.  Cards exchanged with the US last year were arriving in the New Year.  Funnily enough they came much quicker this year.  So all my cards abroad were by email this year. The other reason we send less cards is that it was once a good opportunity to keep in touch with news.  I still personalise many cards with a news and for some a letter, and am a bit grumpy when I get a single line back,  Or worse a round robin about their perfect lives and families.  But most of us now communicate I expect primarily by WhatApp, email, FB etc.  No need for lightweight airmail envelope and paper in one.    The other subject is the mail as a whole. Privitisation appears to have done it no favours and the opening up of competition with restrictions on competing for parcel post with the new entrants.  Clearly unless you do special delivery there is a good chance that first class will not be delivered in a day as was expected in the past.   Should we have kept a public owned service subsidised by the tax payer?  You could also question how much lead on innovation was lost following the hiving off of the national telecommunications and mail network.
    • Why have I got a feeling there was also a connection with the beehive in Brixton on that road next to the gym
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...