Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Jules-and-Boo Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I know, I saw adults in the park too.

>

> Why are people just NOT getting the message?



Because there has not been a sufficiently clear and coordinated public information campaign which tells people not just what they must and mustn't do, but also exactly WHY.

Peckhampam Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Sue

> I have to disagree. What you can do and why has

> been repeated ad infinitum on all

> telecommunications channels. But some people just

> don't think it applies to them.

Yes Peckhampam is right. Every time I see a group of teens TOGETHER- they are the same age and obviously come from different households. They are putting themselves and their own families at risk. Their parents probably lost control of them some time ago and they will do just as they please. The public information is CRYSTAL clear....but as I read on a blog or post from a father- '24/7 parenting is impossible.'

who parents the irresponsible adults who are out?


Every time I see a group of adults together - who clearly do NOT live together, I want to call the police or their parents. but at their age, they should certainly know better. They are not setting a good example to our young people.

The information on what to do is crystal clear, yes.


I disagree that it is clear as to exactly why, for example that somebody can transmit the virus to many others whilst showing no symptoms whatsoever themselves.


And also the exponential nature of the transmission, and how that changes if one person initially transmits the virus to two, or to ten, and so on and so on.


It certainly wasn't clear on the government information I got with the letter from Boris.


If people don't understand the reasons why they are being asked to do things, they are less likely to do them, I would have thought.

I suppose it's only people who have lost a job and have to beg for some money from the government to live on, have to queue for an hour to buy food, need to pause your mortgage or rent payments and other debt, see family members in quarantine, have to home school your children... even if you didn't understand the reason for social isolation, you'd realise it was bloody serious.


If you're not directly impacted by any of these things, you'd need to have it explained to you in a different way. And clearly that isn't happening.

I don't know how to link a discussion thread properly......but please see this thread about teenagers in the Lounge section. Teenagers are targeted often but I don't want to repeat my response


https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/forum/read.php?20,2108537


(Oh, looks like I've worked it out!)

That, exactly Binkylilyput.


Thanks for posting the link.


Don't let your fear of our teens make you forget they are extremely vulnerable.

They are too poor to move out if they need to be safe and have no control over their home environment.


If they were happy and safe at home, you can bet your bottom dollar that that is where they would be.

worldwiser Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I suppose it's only people who have lost a job and

> have to beg for some money from the government to

> live on, have to queue for an hour to buy food,

> need to pause your mortgage or rent payments and

> other debt, see family members in quarantine, have

> to home school your children... even if you didn't

> understand the reason for social isolation, you'd

> realise it was bloody serious.

>

> If you're not directly impacted by any of these

> things, you'd need to have it explained to you in

> a different way. And clearly that isn't happening.



No, it doesn't seem to be.

Sue Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> The information on what to do is crystal clear,

> yes.

>

> I disagree that it is clear as to exactly why, for

> example that somebody can transmit the virus to

> many others whilst showing no symptoms whatsoever

> themselves.

>

> And also the exponential nature of the

> transmission, and how that changes if one person

> initially transmits the virus to two, or to ten,

> and so on and so on.

>

> It certainly wasn't clear on the government

> information I got with the letter from Boris.

>

> If people don't understand the reasons why they

> are being asked to do things, they are less likely

> to do them, I would have thought.


Yes I suppose that accounts for the number of people who use a public toilet and don't wash their hands....

I don't believe there are many out there including teens, who don't know what's going on especially since Primark is shut etc

I was speaking to my sister yesterday who is a business owner, (many people all different age groups use her store) she's not that often opinionated but yesterday she was.

She is getting angry (yes that's the word she used) at seeing teenagers/youngsters hanging out together instead of isolating.

I was quite chilled about it & thought well if they've got nowhere to go then good luck to them, if they get ill it's their problem (as well as the NHS' of course)

She weren't having it.

As she quite rightly put it if there ar elderly/vulnerable people in a hospital & they have to make a choice as to who's life should be saved, they'd no doubt choose the youngsters!

So yes people unnecessarily going out are putting other people's lives at risk & not realising.


Tbh I wasn't thinking on that level, but when she put it to to me..... Well what can I say

I think we have to remember here, what is it like to be a teenager. You feel invincible at that age right? And death is something that happens to old people right? We live in a western culture where most people do not die before their time. This is very different to parts of the world where people frequently die from the impacts of poor hygiene, poor sanitation, and poor healthcare. In many ways, our first world sanitation is our downfall. We live in a bubble where the very idea of an unseen microscopic virus upending our way of life is an anathema.


So that poses a question that is as much about culture as it is about science. How do we impress on that minority of teens and adults alike who think they are not part of the risk? The good news is that they are a minority. The bad news is that it only takes one infected person to cause havoc with this virus. I don't have the answers either sadly, but if we are to change those minority mindsets, we need to be clever about it. It is about winning the argument.

If teenagers today are anything I was like as a teenager, then they will automatically want to do the opposite of what they?re told. They are learning about life and testing authority. Just ranting about their behaviour and complaining about their parents won?t help, the problem needs to be articulated to them in a different way. I don?t have the answer to this by the way!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Per Cllr McAsh, as quoted above: “We are currently updating our Enforcement Policy and changes will allow for the issuing of civil penalties ranging from £175 to £300 for visible smoke emissions, replacing the previous reliance on criminal prosecution. " Is anyone au fait with the Clean Air Act 1993, and  particularly with the state of 'Smoke Control' law and practice generally?  I've just been looking  through some of it for the first time and, afaics, the civil penalties mentioned  were introduced into the Clean Air Act, at Schedule 1A, in May 2022.  So it seems that, in this particular,  it's a matter of the enforcement policy trailing well behind the legislation.  I'm not criticising that at all, but am curious.  
    • Here's the part of march46's linked-to Southwark News article pertaining to Southwark Council. "Southwark Council were also contacted for a response. "Councillor James McAsh, Cabinet Member for Clean Air, Streets & Waste said: “One of Southwark’s key priorities is to create a healthy environment for our residents. “To achieve this we closely monitor legislation and measures that influence air pollution – our entire borough apart from inland waterways is designated as a Smoke Control Area, and we also offer substantial provision for electric vehicles to promote alternative fuel travel options and our Streets for People strategy. “We as a council support the work of Mums for Lungs and recognise the health and environmental impacts of domestic solid fuel burning, particularly from wood-burning appliances. “We are currently updating our Enforcement Policy and changes will allow for the issuing of civil penalties ranging from £175 to £300 for visible smoke emissions, replacing the previous reliance on criminal prosecution.  “This work is being undertaken in collaboration with other London boroughs as part of the pan-London Wood Burning Project, which aims to harmonise enforcement approaches and share best practice across the capital.” ETA: And here's a post I made a few years ago, with tangential relevance.  https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/278140-early-morning-drone-flying/?do=findComment&comment=1493274  
    • The solicitor is also the Executor. Big mistake, but my Aunt was very old, and this was the Covid years and shortly after so impossible to intervene and get a couple of close relatives to do this.  She had no children so this is the nephews and nieces. He is a single practitioner, and most at his age would have long since retired - there is a question over his competence Two letters have already gone essentially complaining - batted off and 'amusingly' one put the blame on us. There are five on our side, all speaking to each other, and ideally would work as a single point of contact.  But he has said that this is not allowed - we've all given approval to act on each others behalf. There are five on her late husband's side, who have not engaged with us despite the suggestion to work as a team, There is one other, who get's the lion's share, the typicical 'friend', but we are long since challenging the will. I would like to put another complaint together that he has not used modern collective communication (I expect that he is incapable) which had seriously delayed the execution of the will.   I know many in their 80s very adept with smart phones so that is not an ageist comment. The house has deteriorated very badly, with cold, damp and a serious leak.  PM me if you want to see the dreadful condition that it is now in. I would also question why if the five of us are happy to work together why all of us need to confirm in writing.             The house was lived in until Feb 23, and has been allowed to get like this.
    • Isn’t a five yearly electricity safety certificate one of the things the landlord must give for a legal tenancy?
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...