Jump to content

Recommended Posts

And another one BITE?s the dust.


Given the recent(ish) news on trolls, the chap who harangued grieving relatives of suicides, the Tom Daley idiot and this bbc piece saying we're too harsh on trolls in this country, I'm just wondering what the attraction is.


I guess I can just about get some pubescent kid thinking they're clever, or an angry child expressing their anger in an oblique and unhealhy fashion in a relatively benign version of going postal.


But why anyone beyond the realms of the confusing changes of pre-adulthood would indulge, I'm afraid I'm at a bit of a loss.


We seem to have a few categories here.


1. The obvious WUM

obsessions: yummy mummies, three wheeled prams, kids in pubs, poncey pubs, poncey food, cookwank, smugness in general

MO: howling at the moon as their slice of London changes before their eyes without apparently having the common decency to ask their permission.


2. The anti liberal agenda

obsessions: see above, also add any form of toleration of things they don't approve of, usually any or a mixture of gays, women's lib, muslims, anyone who's a bit different

MO: it's PC gone maaaaad! Links to Daily Mail articles peddling half truths and innuendo designed to boil the tempers of octogernarian conservatives.


3. The Conspiracy Theorist

obsessions: sheeple, The united states, hidden agendas, the media, nothing can EVER be what it appears to be

MO: random links, liberal use of non sequiturs, refusal to enter sensible debate, a complete lack of internal consistency


4.The Free Speecher

obsessions: cliques, conflates sensible moderation with oppressive censorship

MO: use of accusastion over debate, accusations of bullying when others views dont coincide with their own, prone to starting deliberately inflammatory threads


5. The Grey area

not a troll as such, just difficult.

BBW is the obvious here, a popular poster who could be insightful, witty and very funny, but would always have to test the limits of patience, and thus removed about 30 times under different guises. THen there was MikeCG, very difficult to tell how much wa personal opinion and how much was a construct, but veered between sincerity and trollish activities. Ultimately too angry and confrontational to be allowed to continue.


Can anyone add any more or remember any fine examples or shed any light on the phenomenon?

Are any of them missed?


I think my all time favourite was the chap from Blackwater, what was his name again?

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/25207-edf-trolls/
Share on other sites

For the record a first time poster, posting on a thread about someone who's just being banned, on being accused of being said bannee, saying "I've no idea who you are talking about" is about as schoolboy a trolling error as you can commit.


You need to cultivate a new persona by starting in the items offered section, have a spat over plumbing skills with someone in the business section, before having a couple of innocuous musings about bus timetables in the general issues and make sure there's at least 1 month between your previous ban and starting to troll in the new incarnation.


I give champ about an hour before he's banned.

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/25207-edf-trolls/#findComment-570589
Share on other sites

For the record it was the jrussel reminiscence that got me thinking, i guess we could file him under


6. The pointless prankster - Often highly entertaining and mostly harmless

obsessions: anything and everything

MO: obscure and oblique complaints designed as much to bemuse and confuse as to provoke.

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/25207-edf-trolls/#findComment-570592
Share on other sites

Sorry to disappoint but I'm not this BITE chap you seem to think I am. I was merely expressing an honest opinion that I thought your little piece about internet trolls was insipid dross and I was annoyed I spent time reading it! Now I regret doing this as it seems to have inspired you to continue your pointless little descriptions.
Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/25207-edf-trolls/#findComment-570605
Share on other sites

Ha ha Nashoi thaks, that was the chap, inspired entertainment.


Fine Champ, you registered today just happened to go to the lounge and read that (a place many quite long term regular users of the community forum are barely even aware of) and felt the need to express your ennui, four minutes after registering.

Yeah that's pretty typical behaviour.

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/25207-edf-trolls/#findComment-570611
Share on other sites

Urgh. Don't inflate this pathetic racist's ego any further. I've ssen BBW banned from countless forums. And on each one he was progressively more offensive than the last. Sure, he appeals to the right-wing, and anyone else who enjoys his disgusting brand of humour. But, on the bright side, he sticks out a mile, which means that he's swiftly disposed of.


Here's some of his previous "insight" from the STF:


He claimed to have overheard some gypsies in Crystal Palace arranging to swap a baby they'd adopted for a thoroughbred greyhound.


People from Catford should be subjected to germ warfare.


Jews are professional victims, hereditary schemers and all keep money under their hats.


People on the dole should be subjected to a monthly audit to make sure they're not spending their benefits on beer and tattoos.


The Big Issue has a recruiting office in Romania.


Aryans aren't a master race because Germany's never fielded a decent rugby team. (WTF?)


Etc, Etc.


Rick Channing? The 'American' who showed up on STF? Surely that couldn't have been, umm... BBW?

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/25207-edf-trolls/#findComment-570631
Share on other sites

The German thing is quite funny though and lots of quips like that would make it highly readable to some.... before he spoiled it some anti-semitic rant. Borderline trolls are the hardest to deal with.


My take is it is the bored, unloved and alienated with perhaps a touch of borderline personality disorder who make up the worst at the extreme end with the usual immature mischief makers on the other. It has to be an extension of their real persona in some form...which is perhaps worrying but also real life.

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/25207-edf-trolls/#findComment-570636
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Another great job from Leon - sorted a consumer unit and EICR for me last minute. Highly recommend 
    • Admin, please move this if it's in the wrong section. Can anybody recommend a reasonably local dietician (or possibly nutritionist? Not sure what the difference is). My GP has suggested I see a dietician, but there isn't one attached to the practice. I have googled, but it's very hard to tell what people may be like from an online description, and I want somebody who is properly qualified. Alternatively, please PM me if you know of people I should avoid! Thanks x
    • A vet might be able to trace its owners if it's chipped. Also I believe twb who posts on here has a mobile scanner. Poor cat.
    • If you look at the application linked to in the OP, you'll see it's a Licensing Act 2003 one, in this case for the purposes of sale by retail of alcohol and for the provision of late night refreshment: "TAKEAWAY COFFEE/ HOT SNACKS 2300-0100". IF the shop counts as a Hot Food Takeaway, then section P48 of the Southwark Plan https://www.southwark.gov.uk/sites/default/files/2024-09/Southwark Plan 2022 reduced 1.pdf , which appears to be the latest one linked to on Southwark's site, will I presume be applied in any  planning application (Is there one?). It says: "New hot food takeaways will only be permitted where: ..... 3. The proposed location is further than 400 metres from any existing or proposed primary or secondary school’s boundary; ....." It incorporates  policy laid down in the National Planning Policy Framework, and thence the London Plan.  Over the years KFC, and others, have taken a  number of appeals against local planning authority decisions on Takeaways to the Planning Inspectorate.  Some have been allowed.  KFCs 'commentary on evidence contained in London Plan Topic Paper: Hot Food Takeaways', https://www.london.gov.uk/sites/default/files/nlp_ad_91.pdf may be of interest to some. I'm guessing it's referring to https://www.london.gov.uk/sites/default/files/london_plan_topic_paper_on_hot_food_takeaways.pdf of 2018, but haven't yet checked.  
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...