Jump to content

Recommended Posts

eastdulwichavenger Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> This is the vibe I get from this thread



Yeah that's right. Becuase a 'white guy' is asking questions we have to belittle and dismiss him, becuase he must just be a an 'oxygen theif', trying to wind people up.


How dare he have the nerve to question what we know to be true. The entitlement that he's showing is evidence that he's a bad, bad person.

Glad you agree.


This entire thread has just a been ploy for you to have a one-sided debate.


So I won't be replying anymore, because, let's face it, your views are never going to change because you won't allow it. Instead you wanted a space to have a fun, light-hearted debate, but when you're debating people's lives, its no longer fun or light-hearted.


But it's ok that you might not understand that because not everyone's perfect, it gives me hope for my current generation and how young people will change the future. But try to do better.

eastdulwichavenger Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

>

>

> So I won't be replying anymore,


Hahaha. So you make one post with a meme that someone else has written. And you think you are 'replying'. How will we ever manage without your peurile contribution?


And if its a 'one sided debate' then tell me what your issue is? And make it two sided. But evidence suggests that you have neither the intelligence or the fortitude to actually engage on the issue. You'd prefer to just wade in and have a go at me for reasons you clearly don't think you need to explain, becuase you're so caught up in your own self-righteousness to ever actually use any critical thought.

Totally spot on. Thanks so much. I love it when a clever meme sums things up so accurately. Even better when the person personified in the meme chimes back in with EXACTLY the response that the meme exemplified!


So brilliant. I feel like I can stop reading and feeling angry about this thread now




eastdulwichavenger Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> This is the vibe I get from this thread

binkylilyput Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Totally spot on. Thanks so much. I love it when a

> clever meme sums things up so accurately. Even

> better when the person personified in the meme

> chimes back in with EXACTLY the response that the

> meme exemplified!

>

> So brilliant. I feel like I can stop reading and

> feeling angry about this thread now

>

>

>

> eastdulwichavenger Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > This is the vibe I get from this thread


dear oh dear. I feel so sorry for you.

I don't understand why people can feel they can let go of anger, or feel a meme can be "brilliant". When it only leaves divide. Its stereo typing, it does not help in bringing people together, yes there may be people who fit that template, does that mean assumptions can be made about people if they speak out about what they feel is causing divide. I don't know OP but I don't beieve he/she has brought up anything thats inflammatory. We do not know peoples individual lives.

I am worried how it is becoming the norm to not allow people to speak or differ.

Was it Bush that says, your either with us or your not. Leaving no room only sides.

KidKruger Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> It's cheap and lazy to meme-bomb a post. Limited

> thinking and a need to be antagonistic.


Yes- and no prizes for guessing who came up with that piece of cr*p, either. Everyone is being manipulated by the left and the antifa fascists for their own ends

unclglen - let's keep this simple. no diversions. no distractions.

Just one question = one answer.

OK ?


Question: Please advise "who came up with that piece of cr*p". It sounds like you know. I'm rubbish at guessing.

Answer: ?




uncleglen Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> KidKruger Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > It's cheap and lazy to meme-bomb a post.

> Limited

> > thinking and a need to be antagonistic.

>

> Yes- and no prizes for guessing who came up with

> that piece of cr*p, either. Everyone is being

> manipulated by the left and the antifa fascists

> for their own ends

KidKruger Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> unclglen - let's keep this simple. no diversions.

> no distractions.

> Just one question = one answer.

> OK ?

>

> Question: Please advise "who came up with that

> piece of cr*p". It sounds like you know. I'm

> rubbish at guessing.

> Answer: ?

>

>

>

> uncleglen Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > KidKruger Wrote:

> >

> --------------------------------------------------

>

> > -----

> > > It's cheap and lazy to meme-bomb a post.

> > Limited

> > > thinking and a need to be antagonistic.

> >

> > Yes- and no prizes for guessing who came up

> with

> > that piece of cr*p, either. Everyone is being

> > manipulated by the left and the antifa fascists

> > for their own ends


I should have put 'Everyone' in capital letters- since the 'piece of cr*p' was obviously created by one of them.

I think Trump is right- they are a terrorist organisation.


Even the writer of this piece 8 lines down says they 'mostly' use nonviolence methods......wtf?

https://theconversation.com/what-or-who-is-antifa-140147

Sorry, joining the debate a little late. I was surprised about the reaction to the meme. It is only right that we question our beliefs and motives from time to time. I've jumped on ever bandwagon for decades - whether this was being trendy, a reaction to my fairly conservative upbringing and lack of local diversity, or innate being has become rather blurred.


I'd rather be a shallow thinking stereotypical liberal that some others in our society. Obviously I hope I am not shallow thinking.


But I live in a place that is less and less diverse, driven greatly by economics. A bizarre opposite of the white flight from central boroughs in decades after the war, as those not from money or not able to earn it can no longer afford to live in my manor. And with all the talk about diversity in my work place, we generally recruit sh.. hot Oxbridge graduates and that tend to be drawn from a relatively narrow section of society.


Whether the meme stuff was to provoke discussion, challenge beliefs, or just trilling is irrelevant in my view.


That said things have got so much better in my lifetime......

alice Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> What honestly is the point of this thread? It?s a

> fake discussion allowing a space for racist views.

> Any chance of it closing?


I think this thread on got to a point where it has become dog whistle links and memes becuase there was an inability of people to engage with others when they disagree on what are really minor issues (no racism is not a minor issue..I mean opinion about how best to tackle it)


The Lions share of people on this thread (including me as the OP) are clearly 'anti-rascist'....but there is disagreement on the narrative around how to discuss and achieve that. And some people see disagreement with anything that BLM says as evidence of racism.


You know it's a losing endeavour, when you get told that 'white silence is violence'.....then you engage, and get memes posted, saying white guys claiming to engage is another no no......

DB....look I know that's the goal. Of course. And I know I'm painted as being anti that goal. But it's not just about me. How does this movement win over people who are 'anti-racist'....but don't like being told that they have no voice/are privileged etc?


Should we be academic or should we be practical?

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Per Cllr McAsh, as quoted above: “We are currently updating our Enforcement Policy and changes will allow for the issuing of civil penalties ranging from £175 to £300 for visible smoke emissions, replacing the previous reliance on criminal prosecution. " Is anyone au fait with the Clean Air Act 1993, and  particularly with the state of 'Smoke Control' law and practice generally?  I've just been looking  through some of it for the first time and, AFAICS, the "civil penalties ranging from £175 to £300" were introduced into the Clean Air Act, at Schedule 1A, in May 2022.  So it seems that, in this particular,  it's a matter of the enforcement policy trailing well behind the legislation.  I'm not criticising that at all, but am curious.  
    • Here's the part of march46's linked-to Southwark News article pertaining to Southwark Council. "Southwark Council were also contacted for a response. "Councillor James McAsh, Cabinet Member for Clean Air, Streets & Waste said: “One of Southwark’s key priorities is to create a healthy environment for our residents. “To achieve this we closely monitor legislation and measures that influence air pollution – our entire borough apart from inland waterways is designated as a Smoke Control Area, and we also offer substantial provision for electric vehicles to promote alternative fuel travel options and our Streets for People strategy. “We as a council support the work of Mums for Lungs and recognise the health and environmental impacts of domestic solid fuel burning, particularly from wood-burning appliances. “We are currently updating our Enforcement Policy and changes will allow for the issuing of civil penalties ranging from £175 to £300 for visible smoke emissions, replacing the previous reliance on criminal prosecution.  “This work is being undertaken in collaboration with other London boroughs as part of the pan-London Wood Burning Project, which aims to harmonise enforcement approaches and share best practice across the capital.” ETA: And here's a post I made a few years ago, with tangential relevance.  https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/278140-early-morning-drone-flying/?do=findComment&comment=1493274  
    • The solicitor is also the Executor. Big mistake, but my Aunt was very old, and this was the Covid years and shortly after so impossible to intervene and get a couple of close relatives to do this.  She had no children so this is the nephews and nieces. He is a single practitioner, and most at his age would have long since retired - there is a question over his competence Two letters have already gone essentially complaining - batted off and 'amusingly' one put the blame on us. There are five on our side, all speaking to each other, and ideally would work as a single point of contact.  But he has said that this is not allowed - we've all given approval to act on each others behalf. There are five on her late husband's side, who have not engaged with us despite the suggestion to work as a team, There is one other, who get's the lion's share, the typicical 'friend', but we are long since challenging the will. I would like to put another complaint together that he has not used modern collective communication (I expect that he is incapable) which had seriously delayed the execution of the will.   I know many in their 80s very adept with smart phones so that is not an ageist comment. The house has deteriorated very badly, with cold, damp and a serious leak.  PM me if you want to see the dreadful condition that it is now in. I would also question why if the five of us are happy to work together why all of us need to confirm in writing.             The house was lived in until Feb 23, and has been allowed to get like this.
    • Isn’t a five yearly electricity safety certificate one of the things the landlord must give for a legal tenancy?
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...