Jump to content
Message added by Administrator,

This is a highly emotive topic. Please debate respectfully. Avoid making provocative statements, personal attacks and accusations against other forum members. 

You will be restricted from posting in this topic if you fail to abide by this.

Recommended Posts

This is a link to a long article about the murder by Israeli police of Eyad Hallaq in Jerusalem. I don't understand why there is no out-cry about it. By the way the IDF train American police in "control" techniques.


https://jfjfp.com/hes-disabled-the-caregiver-screamed-im-with-her-eyad-cried-the-cop-opened-fire-anyway/


There is more on the JFJFP website:


https://mailchi.mp/c97b90639c9b/reminder-of-agm-20-january-8709509?e=9ebda826d3

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/254383-palestinian-lives-matter/
Share on other sites

In deed, and perhaps the agenda should be extended to American foreign policy as a whole, treatment of indigenous Americans, and screwing up the planet as a whole. Serious comments by the way. And there are many good people and organisations in the US and could be so much a force for good.

It's not about ALL racism. But it SHOULD be.

It's about the regime in western world.

BLM are disruptive, with a commitment to disrupt state structure that disproportionately harms black people, it's anti captitalist, antiauthoritarian.


It's not about all racism and it's not about all slavery.


Ok, shoot me now as clearly no one's allowed to say anything negative....

NewWave Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> All lives matter.

> In my ideal world there would be world peace where

> no one suffers due to colour or creed.

> We are all equal we all feel pain and all deserve

> love and compassion.

> One love one world


But some have suffered in the past more than others and we can't ignore history.


Some still are suffering more than others but you can't force equality and peace on the world through war (to some extent Blair tried that through liberal interventionism and I think it largely failed)

Jules-and-Boo Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> It's not about ALL racism. But it SHOULD be.

> It's about the regime in western world.

> BLM are disruptive, with a commitment to disrupt

> state structure that disproportionately harms

> black people, it's anti captitalist,

> antiauthoritarian.

>

> It's not about all racism and it's not about all

> slavery.

>

> Ok, shoot me now as clearly no one's allowed to

> say anything negative....


What you've said is actually positive J&B, not negative. It's about stating the truth.


We're now in a situation in which the history and culture are being compromised - statues down, film and TV materials being removed, will it be book burnings next? None of this will help black people... none of this will help anyone.

SpringTime Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Jules-and-Boo Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > It's not about ALL racism. But it SHOULD be.

> > It's about the regime in western world.

> > BLM are disruptive, with a commitment to

> disrupt

> > state structure that disproportionately harms

> > black people, it's anti captitalist,

> > antiauthoritarian.

> >

> > It's not about all racism and it's not about

> all

> > slavery.

> >

> > Ok, shoot me now as clearly no one's allowed to

> > say anything negative....

>

> What you've said is actually positive J&B, not

> negative. It's about stating the truth.

>

> We're now in a situation in which the history and

> culture are being compromised - statues down, film

> and TV materials being removed, will it be book

> burnings next? None of this will help black

> people... none of this will help anyone.


Be careful not is all as it seems sometimes - for instance Little Britain want a new series on Netflix and so are aiming to start with a clean slate.


We also got rid of TV like "mind your language" and "the black and white minsterals" years ago so it's nothing new (I guess people will deny that the first one even existed it was so dreadful but it did)


Statues also get removed to museums regularly as the public forgets them - it's just been done quietly before.


https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_public_art_formerly_in_London

When the Place of Westminster is basically gutted in the next few years, I wonder what will become of the statues.


Parliaments own website admits many don't really fit there


"However, the commissioners won the day, and the original statues in the Palace's interior thus bore little relation to scale, style and floor-space of the building they were destined to decorate."


https://www.parliament.uk/about/living-heritage/building/palace/architecture/palace-s-interiors/statues-in-palace/


The Welsh and Scottish parliament buildings are pretty modern affairs and pictures of the new HoC seem similar. Anyway statues are a bit old fashioned when we can have large screens with changing images :)


https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-48199355

Chick Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> This is a link to a long article about the murder

> by Israeli police of Eyad Hallaq in Jerusalem. I

> don't understand why there is no out-cry about it.

> By the way the IDF train American police in

> "control" techniques.

>

> https://jfjfp.com/hes-disabled-the-caregiver-screa

> med-im-with-her-eyad-cried-the-cop-opened-fire-any

> way/

>

> There is more on the JFJFP website:

>

> https://mailchi.mp/c97b90639c9b/reminder-of-agm-20

> -january-8709509?e=9ebda826d3


Thanks Chick. Saw this and signed at the time. Was also surprised there wasn't more reaction. Truly shocking...

Palestinian lives matter.

Lives of disabled people matter.


HP

  • 2 weeks later...

SpringTime Wrote:

>

> We're now in a situation in which the history and

> culture are being compromised - statues down, film

> and TV materials being removed, will it be book

> burnings next? None of this will help black

> people... none of this will help anyone.


History and culture are not being compromised, they are being exposed. The ugly truth. That's why we all feel uncomfortable. So we should be.


This isn't about pulling down statues, book burnings, street name changes, that's all symbolic BUT respectful. Is anyone here actually proud of a statue of a slave trader? Or a street named after one? No wonder the BLM are pulling them down, they're angry. So would you be if you had spent hundreds of years being enslaved, beaten up, killed, treated like second class citizens because of your skin colour.


What it is about, is white people learning and checking their ingrained prejudices. This country was built on slavery and racism. Nothing to be proud about.


We have an opportunity to change the future, can't change the past, but we CAN acknowledge it rather than hiding behind our white privilege. It's up to all of us to make this happen.


Of course all lives matter, no one says they don't, but right now (and for hundreds of years) black people are suffering because of the colour of their skin.


What's problematic about 'all lives matter' - lots of different explanations


https://www.vox.com/2016/7/11/12136140/black-all-lives-matter


This is US, but black parents in the UK have these conversations.


https://www.facebook.com/538470420/videos/10158474333170421/


Still think we don't have a problem in the UK.....




Anti racism resources


https://docs.google.com/document/d/1BRlF2_zhNe86SGgHa6-VlBO-QgirITwCTugSfKie5Fs/preview?fbclid=IwAR0qYDNvDMpPq6AtzyhLY-lzPOoI-1jrswyAOE5c3u4Rs0S7xLiILxFR0Ys&pru=AAABcwqZBxI*gAzqzYftNmHi01Hb0Z7qYw


What can you do to help?


https://docs.google.com/document/d/1cq6zYlu-yFtcqu_J7pG4RpenlN-yPRINLShnnLyPfRQ/edit?fbclid=IwAR3PkwA5oy0ewfo3w4tyBI422JAvqEUsQlldQP_djGj1DVoANzuDW9gxV9c

You are ace!




Alec1 Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> SpringTime Wrote:

> >

> > We're now in a situation in which the history

> and

> > culture are being compromised - statues down,

> film

> > and TV materials being removed, will it be book

> > burnings next? None of this will help black

> > people... none of this will help anyone.

>

> History and culture are not being compromised,

> they are being exposed. The ugly truth. That's

> why we all feel uncomfortable. So we should be.

>

> This isn't about pulling down statues, book

> burnings, street name changes, that's all symbolic

> BUT respectful. Is anyone here actually proud of a

> statue of a slave trader? Or a street named after

> one? No wonder the BLM are pulling them down,

> they're angry. So would you be if you had spent

> hundreds of years being enslaved, beaten up,

> killed, treated like second class citizens because

> of your skin colour.

>

> What it is about, is white people learning and

> checking their ingrained prejudices. This country

> was built on slavery and racism. Nothing to be

> proud about.

>

> We have an opportunity to change the future, can't

> change the past, but we CAN acknowledge it rather

> than hiding behind our white privilege. It's up to

> all of us to make this happen.

>

> Of course all lives matter, no one says they

> don't, but right now (and for hundreds of years)

> black people are suffering because of the colour

> of their skin.

>

> What's problematic about 'all lives matter' - lots

> of different explanations

>

> https://www.vox.com/2016/7/11/12136140/black-all-l

> ives-matter

>

> This is US, but black parents in the UK have these

> conversations.

>

> https://www.facebook.com/538470420/videos/10158474

> 333170421/

>

> Still think we don't have a problem in the UK.....

>

>

>


> 643496449

>

> Anti racism resources

>

> https://docs.google.com/document/d/1BRlF2_zhNe86SG

> gHa6-VlBO-QgirITwCTugSfKie5Fs/preview?fbclid=IwAR0

> qYDNvDMpPq6AtzyhLY-lzPOoI-1jrswyAOE5c3u4Rs0S7xLiIL

> xFR0Ys&pru=AAABcwqZBxI*gAzqzYftNmHi01Hb0Z7qYw

>

> What can you do to help?

>

> https://docs.google.com/document/d/1cq6zYlu-yFtcqu

> _J7pG4RpenlN-yPRINLShnnLyPfRQ/edit?fbclid=IwAR3Pkw

> A5oy0ewfo3w4tyBI422JAvqEUsQlldQP_djGj1DVoANzuDW9gx

> V9c

Jeezuz UG, how do you think any of what you just posted is reasonable.

You know that the Palestinians? land has been literally forcibly removed, the areas assigned to them have been systematically eroded, and they are at the bottom end of an apartheid regime in a land they lived in for centuries.

But you?ll criticise how they fight back, like they?re out of order.

You are coming across as one sick f u c k.

  • 6 months later...
Israel is receiving praise for one of the fastest covid vaccination roll-outs. But this is for citizens of Israel only, including settlers living on occupied Palestinian land and Palestinian residents of Jerusalem. Meanwhile nearly 5 million of Palestinians living under Israeli control in the West Bank and Gaza are being denied the vaccine. There could hardly be a clearer demonstration of how Israeli lives are valued above Palestinian ones by the authorities. End the discrimination. Read more here: http://amn.st/6183HVa73

Israeli security forces committed ?heinous killings? throughout 2020, shooting dead at least 27 Palestinians across occupied Palestinian territories and in Israel, according to Israeli rights group B?Tselem.


?Over the course of 2020, Israeli security forces killed 27 Palestinians, seven of them minors: one in the Gaza Strip, 23 in the West Bank [including East Jerusalem] and three inside Israel,? B?Tselem said on Monday.

Well is Hamas responsible for the procurement of vaccine for its people or not? Why are they not procuring vaccine?


Israel is vaccinating Palestinians that are in Israel and fall under the responsibility of Israel healthcare systems which are semi-private anyway, so it is just not true to argue that they are prejudicing Palestinians per se.

Israel?s army has demolished homes of nearly 80 Palestinians in the occupied West Bank.

Eighteen tents that housed 11 families in the northern village of Khirbet Humsa were razed late on Tuesday.

A total of 74 people were displaced, more than half of which were minors, according to B?Tselem, an Israeli anti-occupation non-government organisation.

The bulldozers and diggers also demolished sheds used as livestock enclosures, portable toilets, water containers and solar panels, on top of confiscating vehicles and tractors belonging to some of the residents.

Palestinian Prime Minister Mohammed Shtayyeh called on the international community to intervene against Israeli troops? attempt to ?displace the citizens of Khirbet Humsa and tens of similar communities from their homes and lands?, pointing to the fact that Israel ?chose this evening to commit another crime? as the attention is focused on the United States presidential election.

Abdelghani Awada, left homeless by the operation, told the AFP news agency that the Israelis gave people ?10 minutes to evacuate our homes?.

?Then, they started bulldozing,? he said.

He said his family had lived in the area for generations and accused Israel of trying to ?empty the Jordan Valley of its Palestinian population?.

The late-night operation was unusual given that so many homes were targeted at the same time, according to B?Tselem.

?Clearly, the intention is to force residents off the land by creating a man-made humanitarian disaster. But residents have told us they have nowhere to go,? said on Twitter Sarit Michaeli, international advocacy officer for the B?Tselem, adding that this was the first demolition in seven years of an entire herder community.

The branch of Israel?s army responsible for civilian affairs in the West Bank, COGAT, said it destroyed structures that were ?built illegally in a firing zone (military training area) in the Jordan Valley?.

The Jordan Valley is home to approximately 60,000 Palestinians, according to the UN, but nearly 90 percent of the land is part of what is known as Area C, the three-fifths of the West Bank that is under complete Israeli control.

It includes closed military areas and about 50 agricultural settlements housing some 12,000 Israelis.

Palestinians are barred from those areas and from the lands they own. They are forbidden from digging wells or building any kind of infrastructure without hard-to-get military permits.

Anything built without a permit, from home extensions to tents, animal pens and irrigation networks, is at risk of demolition by the Israeli military [Jaafar Ashtiyeh/AFP]From 2009 to 2016, less than two percent of more-than-3,300 permit applications in Area C were successful, according to Peace Now, an Israeli anti-settlement group, citing official statistics.

Anything built without a permit, from home extensions to tents, animal pens and irrigation networks, is at risk of demolition by the Israeli military.

Almost 800 Palestinians, including 404 minors, have already lost their homes in 2020.

Throughout the entire previous year, 677 lost their homes, up from 387 in 2018 and 521 in 2017.

SOURCE : AL JAZEERA AND NEWS AGENCIES

"Meanwhile nearly 5 million of Palestinians living under Israeli control in the West Bank and Gaza are being denied the vaccine. There could hardly be a clearer demonstration of how Israeli lives are valued above Palestinian ones by the authorities. End the discrimination. Read more here: [amn.st]"


I think it's clear.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • I think mostly those are related to the same "issues". In my experience, it's difficult using the pin when reporting problems, especially if you're on a mobile... There's two obvious leaks in that stretch and has been for sometime one of them apparently being sewer flooding 😱  
    • BBC Homepage Skip to content Accessibility Help EFor you Notifications More menu Search BBC                     BBC News Menu   UK England N. Ireland Scotland Alba Wales Cymru Isle of Man Guernsey Jersey Local News Vets under corporate pressure to increase revenue, BBC told   Image source,Getty Images ByRichard Bilton, BBC Panorama and Ben Milne, BBC News Published 2 hours ago Vets have told BBC Panorama they feel under increasing pressure to make money for the big companies that employ them - and worry about the costly financial impact on pet owners. Prices charged by UK vets rose by 63% between 2016 and 2023, external, and the government's competition regulator has questioned whether the pet-care market - as it stands - is giving customers value for money. One anonymous vet, who works for the UK's largest vet care provider, IVC Evidensia, said that the company has introduced a new monitoring system that could encourage vets to offer pet owners costly tests and treatment options. A spokesperson for IVC told Panorama: "The group's vets and vet nurses never prioritise revenue or transaction value over and above the welfare of the animal in their care." More than half of all UK households are thought to own a pet, external. Over the past few months, hundreds of pet owners have contacted BBC Your Voice with concerns about vet bills. One person said they had paid £5,600 for 18 hours of vet-care for their pet: "I would have paid anything to save him but felt afterwards we had been taken advantage of." Another described how their dog had undergone numerous blood tests and scans: "At the end of the treatment we were none the wiser about her illness and we were presented with a bill of £13,000."   Image caption, UK pet owners spent £6.3bn on vet and other pet-care services in 2024, according to the CMA Mounting concerns over whether pet owners are receiving a fair deal prompted a formal investigation by government watchdog, the Competition and Markets Authority (CMA). In a provisional report, external at the end of last year, it identified several issues: Whether vet companies are being transparent about the ownership of individual practices and whether pet owners have enough information about pricing The concentration of vet practices and clinics in the hands of six companies - these now control 60% of the UK's pet-care market Whether this concentration has led to less market competition and allowed some vet care companies to make excess profits 'Hitting targets' A vet, who leads one of IVC's surgeries (and who does not want to be identified because they fear they could lose their job), has shared a new internal document with Panorama. The document uses a colour code to compare the company's UK-wide tests and treatment options and states that it is intended to help staff improve clinical care. It lists key performance indicators in categories that include average sales per patient, X-rays, ultrasound and lab tests. The vet is worried about the new policy: "We will have meetings every month, where one of the area teams will ask you how many blood tests, X-rays and ultrasounds you're doing." If a category is marked in green on the chart, the clinic would be judged to be among the company's top 25% of achievers in the UK. A red mark, on the other hand, would mean the clinic was in the bottom 25%. If this happens, the vet says, it might be asked to come up with a plan of action. The vet says this would create pressure to "upsell" services. Panorama: Why are vet bills so high? Are people being priced out of pet ownership by soaring bills? Watch on BBC iPlayer now or BBC One at 20:00 on Monday 12 January (22:40 in Northern Ireland) Watch on iPlayer For instance, the vet says, under the new model, IVC would prefer any animal with suspected osteoarthritis to potentially be X-rayed. With sedation, that could add £700 to a bill. While X-rays are sometimes necessary, the vet says, the signs of osteoarthritis - the thickening of joints, for instance - could be obvious to an experienced vet, who might prefer to prescribe a less expensive anti-inflammatory treatment. "Vets shouldn't have pressure to do an X-ray because it would play into whether they are getting green on the care framework for their clinic." IVC has told Panorama it is extremely proud of the work its clinical teams do and the data it collects is to "identify and close gaps in care for our patients". It says its vets have "clinical independence", and that prioritising revenue over care would be against the Royal College of Veterinary Surgeons' (RCVS) code and IVC policy. Vets say they are under pressure to bring in more money per pet   Published 15 April 2025 Vets should be made to publish prices, watchdog says   Published 15 October 2025 The vet says a drive to increase revenue is undermining his profession. Panorama spoke to more than 30 vets in total who are currently working, or have worked, for some of the large veterinary groups. One recalls being told that not enough blood tests were being taken: "We were pushed to do more. I hated opening emails." Another says that when their small practice was sold to a large company, "it was crazy... It was all about hitting targets". Not all the big companies set targets or monitor staff in this way. The high cost of treatment UK pet owners spent £6.3bn on vet and other pet-care services in 2024 - equal to just over £365 per pet-owning household, according to the CMA. However, most pet owners in the UK do not have insurance, and bills can leave less-well-off families feeling helpless when treatment is needed. Many vets used not to display prices and pet owners often had no clear idea of what treatment would cost, but in the past two years that has improved, according to the CMA. Rob Jones has told Panorama that when his family dog, Betty, fell ill during the autumn of 2024 they took her to an emergency treatment centre, Vets Now, and she underwent an operation that cost almost £5,000. Twelve days later, Betty was still unwell, and Rob says he was advised that she could have a serious infection. He was told a diagnosis - and another operation - would cost between £5,000-£8,000.   Image caption, Betty's owners were told an operation on her would cost £12,000 However, on the morning of the operation, Rob was told this price had risen to £12,000. When he complained, he was quoted a new figure - £10,000. "That was the absolute point where I lost faith in them," he says. "It was like, I don't believe that you've got our interests or Betty's interests at heart." The family decided to put Betty to sleep. Rob did not know at the time that both his local vet, and the emergency centre, branded Vets Now, where Betty was treated, were both owned by the same company - IVC. He was happy with the treatment but complained about the sudden price increase and later received an apology from Vets Now. It offered him £3,755.59 as a "goodwill gesture".   Image caption, Rob Jones says he lost faith in the vets treating his pet dog Betty Vets Now told us its staff care passionately for the animals they treat: "In complex cases, prices can vary depending on what the vet discovers during a consultation, during the treatment, and depending on how the patient responds. "We have reviewed our processes and implemented a number of changes to ensure that conversations about pricing are as clear as possible." Value for money? Independent vet practices have been a popular acquisition for corporate investors in recent years, according to Dr David Reader from the University of Glasgow. He has made a detailed study of the industry. Pet care has been seen as attractive, he says, because of the opportunities "to find efficiencies, to consolidate, set up regional hubs, but also to maximise profits". Six large veterinary groups (sometimes referred to as LVGs) now control 60% of the UK pet care market - up from 10% a decade ago, according to the CMA, external. They are: Linnaeus, which owns 180 practices Medivet, which has 363 Vet Partners with 375 practices CVS Group, which has 387 practices Pets at Home, which has 445 practices under the name Vets for Pets IVC Evidensia, which has 900 practices When the CMA announced its provisional findings last autumn, it said there was not enough competition or informed choice in the market. It estimated the combined cost of this to UK pet owners amounted to £900m between 2020-2024. Corporate vets dispute the £900m figure. They say their prices are competitive and made freely available, and reflect their huge investment in the industry, not to mention rising costs, particularly of drugs. The corporate vets also say customers value their services highly and that they comply with the RCVS guidelines.   Image caption, A CMA survey suggests pet owners are happy with the service they receive from vets A CMA survey suggests pet owners are happy with their vets - both corporate and independent - when it comes to quality of service. But, with the exception of Pets at Home, customer satisfaction on cost is much lower for the big companies. "I think that large veterinary corporations, particularly where they're owned by private equity companies, are more concerned about profits than professionals who own veterinary businesses," says Suzy Hudson-Cooke from the British Veterinary Union, which is part of Unite. Proposals for change The CMA's final report on the vet industry is expected by the spring but no date has been set for publication. In its provisional report, it proposed improved transparency on pricing and vet ownership. Companies would have to reveal if vet practices were part of a chain, and whether they had business connections with hospitals, out-of-hours surgeries, online pharmacies and even crematoria. IVC, CVS and Vet Partners all have connected businesses and would have to be more transparent about their services in the future. Pets at Home does not buy practices - it works in partnership with individual vets, as does Medivet. These companies have consistently made clear in their branding who owns their practices. The big companies say they support moves to make the industry more transparent so long as they don't put too high a burden on vets. David Reader says the CMA proposals could have gone further. "There's good reason to think that once this investigation is concluded, some of the larger veterinary groups will continue with their acquisition strategies." The CMA says its proposals would "improve competition by helping pet owners choose the right vet, the right treatment, and the right way to buy medicine - without confusion or unnecessary cost". For Rob Jones, however, it is probably too late. "I honestly wouldn't get another pet," he says. "I think it's so expensive now and the risk financially is so great.             Food Terms of Use About the BBC Privacy Policy Cookies Accessibility Help Parental Guidance Contact the BBC Make an editorial complaint BBC emails for you Copyright © 2026 BBC. The BBC is not responsible for the content of external sites. Read about our approach to external linking.
    • What does the area with the blue dotted lines and the crossed out water drop mean? No water in this area? So many leaks in the area.
    • You can get a card at the till, though, to get the discount. You don't have to carry it with you (or load it onto your phone), you can just get a different card each time. Not sure what happens if they notice 🤣
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...