Jump to content

Best way to kill a neighbour without being caught?


Peckhamgatecrasher

Recommended Posts

We got someone nearby who *started* playing music outside at 2am! I wouldn't want to hurt them, but I didn't really know what else to do other than stare forlornly at my ceiling and hope that my bad vibes would mean they would be overcome with guilt (they weren't).


Having to open the window in the heat really does make a noise difference though. In my last place, I used to hear a dawn chorus of different phone alarms going off on summer mornings....

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Peckhamgatecrasher Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Recommendations please.

>

> Some plonker practising a clarinet in the garden

> from 8.10 am this morning is making me desperate.


I've had continuous loud building noise from the attached house next door being completely refurbished since last September- every weekday from 8am and they tried it on on a couple of weekends too. They did not contain dust until I got the council involved. The owners who are not living there accused me of lying when I texted them about the weekend work. And skip lorries and building supplies delivery lorries turned up even earlier until we complained to them.


8.10 am is NOT early

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Peckhamgatecrasher Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Recommendations please.

>

> Some plonker practising a clarinet in the garden

> from 8.10 am this morning is making me desperate.


"Kindness" or "softly with his song" are two good recommendations !

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Peckhamgatecrasher Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Recommendations please.

>

> Some plonker practising a clarinet in the garden

> from 8.10 am this morning is making me desperate.



Do you want to borrow my melodeon? 🤣🤣🤣


I'm sure you could drown him out 🤣🤣🤣


ETA: Or her ....



If that fails, you could "accidentally" throw it at him/her. It's quite heavy 🤣

Link to comment
Share on other sites

no, I mean a real one, to the back of the skull. kinda thing.


Peckhamgatecrasher Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> JohnL - rather it were improvements on a

> clarinet.

>

> KK - do you mean retaliate with Peter Gabriel?

>

> Thank you, Spartacus (said tartly).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You could employ the builders that have extended the house next door to me.

I had just cleared up some foxes' scat from outside my back door. I had just gone inside when a large black tile fell into my sideway at exactly the place where I had been cleaning just before! It was not from my roof- they had balanced the tile on the ridge between the two houses and it fell off.

Or failing that, drop a house brick and half a housebrick from the window but make sure it is from your actual window surround into their garden...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

KidKruger Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> wasn't there a guy who used to post on here who

> preached the benefits and purity of hunting by bow

> and arrow (or was it crossbow) ?

> He may be able to help.



Ahh. Robin Hood I remember him well.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

KidKruger Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> wasn't there a guy who used to post on here who

> preached the benefits and purity of hunting by bow

> and arrow (or was it crossbow) ?

> He may be able to help.


Sounds like BBW, saw himself as the Rambo of Sydenham Woods...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

> Or a movement sensitive explosive.


Nitrogen tri-iodide crystals on the keys. Or a computer program which re-broadcasts what's played with a delay of a couple of seconds and/or frequencies shifted by a semitone or so. Neither likely to be fatal but could have marked behavioural effects.


What would we be extinguishing, btw? Mozart, Debussy, Joplin, Gershwin, Bilk, ...?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

diable rouge Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> KidKruger Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > wasn't there a guy who used to post on here who

> > preached the benefits and purity of hunting by

> bow

> > and arrow (or was it crossbow) ?

> > He may be able to help.

>

> Sounds like BBW, saw himself as the Rambo of

> Sydenham Woods...



Crikey, (unwelcome) blast from the past :))

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • The most recent one did, despite the council making it very difficult for anyone to object (which interestingly they were forced to change for the CPZ consultation and look how that went for them). I will dig out the responses for you when I have more time so you can enlighten yourself.   Ha ha...the language used by councils when they see the results of a consultation and need an out to ignore the views of locals...;-) Did you not notice how this only became a thing once the consultation had been run....one wonders why!? Earl you can bluster all you like but you cannot ignore the fact the council closed the junction to emergency services and put lives at risk and resisted all calls (from the emergency services) to open it for them. Surely you can't defend that  or are you willingly turning a blind eye to that too? Ha ha, which kind of begs the question then why so many of you get so vexed by One Dulwich? Surely you could compartmentalise their work if the above was true? I suspect it has a lot to do with the accountability that they are forcing and the fact some don't like it.
    • I believe around 57% of the 5,538 people who were part of the self selecting sample making up the original consultation, opposed the LTN. So just over 3,000 people. This was around 3 years ago now. I think there’s something like 40,000+ living across se22 and SE21 🤷‍♂️  The LTN is a minority interest at best. Whilst it’s an obsession for a small number on the transport thread who strongly oppose it, I suspect most locals quietly approve of the improvements made to that junction. …and we still haven’t heard who has supposedly been pressurising the emergency services and how (are we seriously going with the far left / the commies)? Is anyone willing to stand up and support the 'One' claim that people are partially covering their plates and driving through the filters due to inadequate signage? Again, it all sounds a little ridiculous / desperate. Feels like it may be time for them to start coming to terms with the changes.
    • Okay Earl, of those 'consulted' how many voices were in favour of the junction and how many against? Were there more responses in favour or more against? This local junction change is being driven by Southwark Labour Councillors- not as you assert by Central Govt. Also, if consultations are so irrelevant as indicators of meaningful local support in the way you seem to imply, why do organisations like Southwark Cyclists constantly ask their members to respond to all and any consultation on LTN's and CPZ's?  
    • You could apply the same argument to any kind of penalty as an effective deterrent.  Better than doing nothing. 
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...