Jump to content

Recommended Posts

At the moment my 2 year old attends a nursery that will offer the 15 hours free schooling and it can be used for 'full' days. She currently only attends one day a week and the nursery is open 51 weeks of the year. (I am aware that the 'free' schooling will be pro rated as it is only offered 38 weeks of the year)


Do I leave her here until applying for school (as we can get full days and wont need to find cover in any school holidays) OR do we get her in to a school nursery we would like her to go to where she will be offered 5 mornings/afternoons a weeks and will still have to pay for childcare every day to pick up and look after until one of us is home? And it is only 38 weeks a year so would need cover every school holiday?


I really dont know what is the better option, Grandma looks after her 2 days a week so in terms of cost leaving her where she is is probably the better option, and I know that being in a school nursery holds no bearing as to whether she will get in to a school - but what is better for her...?


Sorry for rambling...I am just so unsure..what have other people decided to do?


Edited to add: as of 1st October I will be working full time - so my daughter will be attending an extra 2 days at nursery.

I'd say keep her where she is too, we also looked into this but decided that as it doesn't garuntee you a place in the school we didn't want to risk moving her and then potentially having to move her again a year later. Also the 5 half days thing would have been pretty impossible to organise on my working days and I want to have the whole day with her on the days I don't work!
keep her where she is, if she's settled and happy. Very few people I know have used or will use school nurseries because both parents work and the half days don't work for them, so that's the 'norm' for us. Miss Oi will be staying in her private nursery till she goes to school. I think you will find when she starts school that it's all irrelevant and they'll be a mixture of nursery 'backgrounds'.

My daughter was in private nursery and we moved her to the school nursery when she was entitled to 15 hours. I am so glad that we did as we was intending on sending her there when she started school, and absolutely hated the place.


She is now attending another local school, and although it has only been a week, so far so good, and a major difference. The transistion hasn't been a problem at all for my daughter, and through both moves she has settled in great and made friends.

mich Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> My daughter was in private nursery and we moved

> her to the school nursery when she was entitled to

> 15 hours.


But many private nurseries also accept the free 15 hours. Plus many private nurseries also accept childcare vouchers through the parents' employment.


In the OP's case, it doesn't look as if there is any cost benefit to moving to a school nursery. If there's no cost benefit, and the child is happy where she is, personally I say leave her there. But everyone is different of course. No right or wrong answer.


Go with your gut. xx

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Rant ahead: You're not one of them but unfortunately, there's a substrate of posters here that do very little except moan and come up with weird conspiracy theories. They're immediately highly critical of just about any change, and their initial assumption is that everyone else is a total fucking contemptible idiot. For example: don't you think that the people who run the libraries will have considered the impact of timing of reconstruction on library users? (In fact, we know they have - because they've made arrangements at other libraries to attempt to mitigate the disruption). After all, these are the people that spend their whole working week thinking about libraries and dealing with library users (and the kids especially). You don't go into the library game for the chicks and fame - so it's fair to assume that librarians are committed to public service and public access to libraries, including by kids. Likewise the built environment people (engineers, architects, construction managers, project managers, construction contractors, subcontractors or whoever is on this job) are told to minimise disruption on every job they do. The thing that occurs to us as amateurs within 30 seconds of us seeing something is probably not something a full time professional hasn't thought about! Southwark Council, the NHS, TfL, Dulwich Estate, Thames Water, Openreach - they're not SPECTRE factories filled with malevolent chaosmongers trying to persecute anyone. They're mostly filled with people who understand their job and try to do their best with what they've been given - just like all of us. Nobody is perfect or immune from challenge, and that's fair enough, but why not at least start from the assumption that there's a good reason why things have been done the way they have? Any normal person would be pleased that their busy, pretty, lively local library is getting refurbished, and will have more space and facilities for kids and teens, and will be more efficient to run and warmer in winter. But no, EDT_Forumite_752 had kids who did an exam 20 years ago, and this makes them an expert on library refurbishment who can see it's all just stuff and nonsense for the green agenda and why can't it all be put off... 😡😡😡
    • I completely misread the previous post, sorry. For some reason I thought the mini cooper was also a police vehicle, DUH.
    • This has given me ideas for the ginger wine I love, that no one else likes!      
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...