Jump to content

Recommended Posts

What are people thoughts on the renaming of Peckham Rye common, there have been so many lovley improvements and its now one of the best parks in London.


A new start deserves a new name! East Dulwich Gardens would be nice?


Its been done before in other areas before http://lewisham-consult.objective.co.uk/portal/customer_services/e/consultation_on_the_proposed_renaming_of_manor_park?tab=info

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/25621-renaming-of-peckham-rye/
Share on other sites

ED2013 Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> What are people thoughts on the renaming of

> Peckham Rye common, there have been so many lovley

> improvements and its now one of the best parks in

> London.

>

> A new start deserves a new name! East Dulwich

> Gardens would be nice?


The "Lady Gardens" would be funnier.

>>ED2013 What are people thoughts on the renaming of Peckham Rye common, there have been so many lovley improvements and its now one of the best parks in London.>Ridgley Why? The Peckham residents might not want it to change.<<


Hi Well said Ridgley. We are forever having to defend our Common and its protected status as an ancient unenclosed space. Now we have to defend its name! East Dulwich hands off our Common!

Renaming Peckham Rye is not going to happen..


Peckham appears in Domesday Book of 1086 as Pecheham.


Peckham Rye goes back to around 1767 or before.


It is bad enough when people change historic Pub names.


We would also need to change the name of the Station.


Fox..

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Well I don't know, and nor do you. Sitting MPs change their parties.
    • The Greens are knocking on the door of Labour in a few wards, so yes, there is some voter swing in play from some local canvassing. Elected officials jumping ship is nothing new. Political careerism is also nothing new. On a local level, all candidates for election start as committed party political activists. That's how they get selected to stand. But politics is also a long game. Far better to stay and be part of any swing when it inevitably comes (as it always does), than to close the door altogether imo. I think James failing to become leader probably was the key factor in his decision, but leaving for another party effectively means there is no way back. Maybe he is going to work himself into the future leadership of the Greens instead. Time will tell.  Edited to add that while I can understand why former Labour supporters feel disillusioned with the current government (both local and national), it's important to remember how bad things were under the last one and the coalition before it. It's going to take time for any government to rebuild the economy and pay down the national debt.
    • Err, are you saying that the Greens are not a political rival to Labour? Funny how those convictions only come to light when many politicians don't get what they want....do you honestly think that Cllr McAsh would have defected had he been allowed to lead Southwark council? Absolutely 1000% not.
    • He's not acting according to his convictions though, he's acting entirely according to his own ambition and self interest.  I'd be very concerned if I was a parent of a child in the Primary School he teaches at. His new party advocate teaching primary school children how to use crack cocaine and heroin: https://metro.co.uk/2026/02/21/green-party-says-primary-school-children-should-be-taught-to-take-drugs-safely-27031825/   Anyway, I feel we will finally be well rid of him. I don't believe he will stand in this ward. He will have a much better chance of election in Nunhead and Queens Road.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...