Jump to content

Recommended Posts

What are people thoughts on the renaming of Peckham Rye common, there have been so many lovley improvements and its now one of the best parks in London.


A new start deserves a new name! East Dulwich Gardens would be nice?


Its been done before in other areas before http://lewisham-consult.objective.co.uk/portal/customer_services/e/consultation_on_the_proposed_renaming_of_manor_park?tab=info

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/25621-renaming-of-peckham-rye/
Share on other sites

ED2013 Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> What are people thoughts on the renaming of

> Peckham Rye common, there have been so many lovley

> improvements and its now one of the best parks in

> London.

>

> A new start deserves a new name! East Dulwich

> Gardens would be nice?


The "Lady Gardens" would be funnier.

>>ED2013 What are people thoughts on the renaming of Peckham Rye common, there have been so many lovley improvements and its now one of the best parks in London.>Ridgley Why? The Peckham residents might not want it to change.<<


Hi Well said Ridgley. We are forever having to defend our Common and its protected status as an ancient unenclosed space. Now we have to defend its name! East Dulwich hands off our Common!

Renaming Peckham Rye is not going to happen..


Peckham appears in Domesday Book of 1086 as Pecheham.


Peckham Rye goes back to around 1767 or before.


It is bad enough when people change historic Pub names.


We would also need to change the name of the Station.


Fox..

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • You don't need to do the research. I had to know the numbers as a TV buyer. I analysed the potential advertising revenue and Channel Four didn't cover their costs. They had some nice 'Channel Four' signs when someone hit the ropes but, In all honesty, a lot a potential revenue was lost because most old knackers were pissed off because they couldn't perve at Carol Vorderman on 'Countdown'.       Sorry, cross-post. I was replying to Malumbu. Give me a minute, if you will.
    • "PGC, do you reckon this 'Anderson -Tendulkar' series could make Tests a bit more interesting to the wider word?" Alas no. Until it comes back to terrestial telly, I think it will always suffer from elitism(?).  Excepting The Guardian, cricket is barely mentioned in other press. I am fortunate in that my daughter has just added me to her subscription on NOW TV. It has been great to watch this test; it really could have gone either way, eariler in the day, which always makes it more exciting. The only bugbear is that I am a TMS afficianado, and they are about eight deliveries ahead of the tv! I thought Tongue was excellent in mopping up the tailenders, and Duckett was a delight to watch. Bumrah and Jadeja were brilliant to see. I'm sure the Edgbaston crowd will have tremendous supporters for both sides. PS: I don't think Jofra will be back on the strength of one county wicket.
    • Why it a strange first post Sue?  We all have to start somewhere! These kids have created a situation where they have been very unpleasant. Surely their physical appearance etc is a key factor in identifying them?  I don’t understand. Are you defending these kids? 
    • I can do the research but are more people watching cricket on TV now it went to the higher bidder or in 05 when it was on Channel 4?  I think that less kids are into cricket since it went off terrestrial.  I suppose I should have had TMS on.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...