Jump to content

Recommended Posts

BrandNewGuy, where have you been?


Chris Mould, director of the Trussell Trust, said: "Every day we meet parents who are skipping meals to feed their children or even considering stealing to stop their children going to bed hungry. It is shocking that there is such a great need for food banks in 21st-century Britain, but the need is growing." http://www.guardian.co.uk/society/2012/jun/25/breadline-britain-growth-food-parcels


"There has been rapid expansion in food banks over the past two years in response to growing numbers of people unable to feed themselves or their families as a result of rising living costs, shrinking incomes and welfare benefit cuts.


The vast majority of food banks do not currently receive direct state funding, and are regarded by ministers as exemplars of the "big society" approach to social problems. They are volunteer-run and exist on public food donations sourced through churches, companies, schools and public "bin collections" organised outside supermarkets." http://www.guardian.co.uk/society/2012/aug/21/councils-invest-food-banks-welfare-cuts


Bin collections!

Oh I see - semantics.


Good point. So 'sometimes things get so bad for people that they have to steal food'. Not that things have recently got bad 'in general', but that generally there will always be people for whom things have got bad. Though it's possible I suppose that if things had got worse recently for some people who were already on the edge, then they might be said to have got 'so bad' recently.


Anyway. Anyone hungry? Let's do lunch.

BrandNewGuy Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> woodrot Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > > > Is it now ok to steal food, maybe things

> have

> > > got

> > > > so bad for people that they have to

> > >

> > > No and no it hasn't.

> >

> >

> > No and yes it has

>

> Show me why people have to steal food because it's

> "got so bad".


Nowe you mention it, of course. How wrong I have been. Luckily you are there to put me right.I was blind and now I can see etc.


brandnewguy - barndnewcommonsensegy more like - shooting from the hip, giving the weedling, simpering so called liberal apologists a wake up call.

That wasn't your question. This guy clearly isn't stealing because he needs to feed himself.


However, your question was "Show me why people have to steal food because it's "got so bad"."


I've done that.


Food banks don't have enough food to meet demand. People are going hungry, in modern Britain. What would you propose?

You haven't shown why people "have to steal food". You've shown me that it happens.


I don't have a "proposal", though any food solution would have to reflect two big factors:


1. Rising basic food prices across the globe, which were the main immediate cause of the "Arab Spring" unrest and riots elsewhere in the world. Those prices are going up again...

2. Phenomenal quantities of wasted food because of our complex system of food production and distribution, and the demands for convenience and choice.

BrandNewGuy Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> You haven't shown why people "have to steal food".

> You've shown me that it happens.

>

> I don't have a "proposal", though any food

> solution would have to reflect two big factors:

>

> 1. Rising basic food prices across the globe,

> which were the main immediate cause of the "Arab

> Spring" unrest and riots elsewhere in the world.

> Those prices are going up again...

> 2. Phenomenal quantities of wasted food because of

> our complex system of food production and

> distribution, and the demands for convenience and

> choice.



No one "has" to do anything if I was being pedantic, but its impossible to generalise on much when humans and their perception / actions are involved- this is why economics is classed as a science, but in reality its nothing of the sort- 2+2 can actually = 5 if you spend enough time on it.


at the most basic level, barring some kind of Malthusian wet dream, food price inflation / relative to incomes is here to stay. Whether we decide to blame the Chinese, the vampire squid speculators of Goldman Sachs or inequalities being exaggerated by globalism, its not going to get any better for those on the bottom.


Agriculture depends on oil to a massive degree, from the blates obvious fuel consumption side , but alos in the production of fertilisers and chems needed to keep production high. I dont wish to be pigeonholed as some kind of stalinistic monothought anti globalist - but until the link between oil and food can be reduced ( we literally eat oil in essense ) , then its going to be messy. Again, not wishing to be labelled as a peak oil theory devotee, we are running out of this stuff are a serious rate bludz

This was the response from Martin Narey (head of Barnardos 2005-2011 and ex-chair of the End Child Poverty coalition) to the Save the Children campaign that suggested that poor families routinely cannot afford to buy enough food:


"Child poverty in the UK is very real, but it?s not the simple poverty that Save the Children describes. Low income is certainly at the heart of it, but it?s also about poverty of aspiration, education and parenting. But I know why Save the Children is talking about missed meals: it captures public attention. Many times when I ran Barnardo?s ? and during the five years in which child poverty was our No 1 priority ? I declined to sign up to campaigns suggesting that British families do not get enough in benefits to feed or clothe their children. I did so for two reasons: because it?s not true, but also because such campaigns suggest that if we met the very basic requirements of a hot meal and warm clothing, people would think that poverty had been lifted.


This isn?t to say that there are not emergencies when families do need urgent help with food or clothing. But they are generally short-term and caused by an administrative glitch, a marital separation, because money has been lost and sometimes, frankly, because it has been squandered on drink or drugs. Such crises are not symptomatic of the welfare state?s failure to provide families with enough money for the basics of life"


I can't post a link to the whole article because of the Times subscription stuff.


People may well steal food because on a particular day they don't have enough money to buy it, but that's clearly not the same as saying that there are lots of people who, on an ongoing basis, cannot afford to feed themselves and their familes.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • What was he doing on the stage at Glastonbury? Or on the stage at the other concert in Finsbury Park? Grinning like a Cheshire cat whilst pissed and stoned 20 somethings on the promise of free internet sung-- Oh Jeremy Corbyn---  What were his policies for Northern mining towns with no jobs or infrastructure? Free Internet and university places for youngsters. What were his other manifesto pledges? Why all the ambiguity over Brexit?  I didn't like Thatcher, Blair or May or Tony but I respected them as politicians because they stood by what they believed in. I respect all politicians across the board that stick to their principles. Corbyn didn't and its why he got  annihilated at the polls. A socialist, anti imperialist and anti capitalist that said he voted for an imperialist and pro capitalist cabal. He refused to say how he'd vote over and over again until the last knockings. He did so to appease the Islington elite and middle class students he was courting. The same people that were screaming that Brexit was racist. At the same time the EU were holding black and Asian immigrants in refugee camps overseas but not a word on that! Corbyn created and courted a student union protest movement that screamed at and shouted down anyone not on the left . They claimed Starmer and the centre right of labour were tories. He didn't get elected  because he, his movement and policies were unelectable, twice. He turned out not to have the convictions of his politics and died on his own sword.    Reform won't win an election. All the idiots that voted for them to keep out Labour actually enabled Labour. They'll be back voting tory next time.    Farage wouldn't be able to make his millions if he was in power. He's a very devious shyster but I very much doubt he'd actually want the responsibility that governance requires.
    • The purge of hard left members that were part of Corbyn's, Mcdonnel's and Lansmans momentum that purged the party of right wing and centrist members. That's politics. It's what Blair did to win, its what Starmer had to do to win. This country doesn't vote in extreme left or right governments. That's partly why Corbyn lost  We're pretty much a centrist bunch.  It doesn't make it false either. It's an opinion based on the voting patterns, demography and statistics. Can you explain then why former mining constituencies that despise the tories voted for them or abstained rather than vote for Corbyns Labour?  What is the truth then? But he never got elected!!! Why? He should have been binned off there and then. Why he was allowed to hang about is an outrage. I hold him party responsible for the shit show that we've had to endure since. 
    • Depends on what the Barista says doesnt it? There was no physical confrontation with the driver, OP thinks she is being targetted when she isnt. These guys work min wage under strict schedules so give them a break unless they damage your stuff
    • CPR Dave, attendance records are available on Southwark's website. Maggie Browning has attended 100% of meetings. Jon Hartley has attended 65%.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...