Jump to content

Recommended Posts

happy happy happy joy joy joy


gordon? you think he be the 'big man' that decide these things...i'm sure he wishes he had that much power.


buying over priced houses on mortgages 5x an income, buying on 0% credit cards all that stuff that was *really* needed and now rots away wasted as a ridiculous interest rate is charged on late card repayments... you name it on all levels, everyone plays a part.

Ok Gordon is not directly responsible for the credit crunch but CGT reform has proven a compltee botch, we have huge inflated public sector spending with little (any?) tangible improvement and now the bad times are coming with falling tax receipts Gordon's rash spending is gonna prove as stupid as those with 5 credit cards and a mortgage 6 times their income - politicians and my money should be kept well apart.....

> there was a recession in 1991 Macro


That was merely a slight down turn compared with the 1979-1982 recession. There are many web-sites with the data if you wish to review them.


Only anecdotal I know, but check out how many of today's Lordship Lane independents were there in 1978.

oh yes cameron and boris would have run the show so differently...oh i suppose they may have taxed us less along the line and we wouldn't have a mayor. a case of cleopatras nose, if the reference is lost can i recommend war and peace by tolstoy (i am not meaning any of this to sound catty, more fun i hope) but as history has always shown no one person runs the band, yet the band plays on.


so long as the bbc keeps making great telly and i can enjoy the smooth tones of radio 4 i'm happy as a man called larry, who ever he may be.

so where should things be headed? complete subsidiarity in the political system? functionalism? anarcho syndicalism? how does one extract money from politics? or, is politics the 20th century religion that is spent and no longer represents how to run society?


i feel a lounge just round the corner so i shall stop posting off topic > back on thread...


recession down LL: well should keep some people happy, all those cursed delis and tat shops, all those kids emporiums and nice restaurants going going gone.

???? Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Businesses in LL are selling up because the

> Capital Gains Tax laws are changing in April to

> once again punish entrepreneurs so a good time to

> bail out,


I'm not convinced CGT is the reason at all ????. The proposed CGT legislation has indeed been ill thought through and punishes the entrepreurial SME culture Gordon purports to nurture but you'll note that following uproar from various sections, a revision is proposed to only impose the 18% flat rate for gains over ?1M. And once-in-a-lifetime gains under ?1M will still be allowed 10% relief. This equates to the current 10% taper relief in place for those holding a business over 2-3 years who then sell up.


So....I'll take a punt and say that I doubt there are many businesses on LL that stand to gain ?1M+ from selling up, unless the business also owns a large freehold. And so CGT implications are minimal for businesses valued under ?1M.

All of this has yet to be ratified anyway so the general uncertainty around CGT could be a factor.


But I think the prospect of a potential recession and a falling commercial property market are far more significant. And clearly businesses running on a small margin or even at a loss will be hit hardest and the first to go.


And anyway the flat CGT at 18% will benefit all of you high earners with a 2nd or 3rd buy to let who then sell and would previously be subject to a potential 40% tax (depending on how long you have held your property).

Unfortunately, yes, there are more, but I would only post information here when the owner has chosen to put the information in the public domain ~and~ I can support a posting with documentary evidence.


Anything else would be unfair on a business which may still be trying to trade itself through and out of difficult times.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Would wholeheartedly recommend Aria. Quality work, very responsive, lovely guy as well. 
    • A positive update from Southwark Council - “We are currently updating our Enforcement Policy and changes will allow for the issuing of civil penalties ranging from £175 to £300 for visible smoke emissions, replacing the previous reliance on criminal prosecution.“  
    • A solicitor is acting as the executor for our late Aunt's will.  He only communicates by letter which is greatly lengthening the process.  The vast majority of legal people deal by modern means - the Electronic Communications Act that allows for much, if not all of these means is now 25 years old.   Any views and advice out there? In fuller detail: The value of the estate is not high.  There are a number of beneficiaries including one in the US.  It has taken almost three years and there is no end in sight.  The estate (house) is now damp, mouldy and wall paper falling off the wall. The solicitor is hostile, has threatened beneficiaries the police (which would just waste the police's time), and will not engage constructively. He only communicates by letter.  These are poorly written, curt or even hostile, in a language from the middle of last century, he clearly is typing these himself probably on a type writer.  Of course with every letter he makes more money. We've taken the first steps to complain either through the ombudsman and/or the SRA.  We have taken legal advice a couple of times, which of course isn't cheap, and were told that his behaviour is shocking and we'd be in our right to have him removed through the courts. But.... we just want him to get on with executing the will, primarily selling the house. However he refuses to use any other form of communication but letter.  So writing to the beneficiary in the 'States can take a month to get a reply. And even in this country a week or more. Having worked with lawyers in the past I am aware that email, tele and video conferencing and even text and WhatApp are appropriate means for communication.  There could be an immediate response to his questions.   Help!        
    • Labour should be applauded for bringing in the Renter's Rights Act.  But so many of you are carried away with slagging them off. Married couples with busy lives sometimes forget who did what. On this occasion Mr Rachel Reeves was sorting out the rental agreement.  Ms Reeves was a bit flumoxed with all the grief/demonsing/witch hunts she is getting so forgot to check with her other half.   Not the first or last time this will happen with couples. (That's not having a go at the post above)
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...