Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Hey all,


The Congestion Charge hours and days have changed in the last few weeks!!


It?s now EVERY day. No more free weekends.

And it is now until 22:00. No more free theatre/cinema/dinner trips.



No communication of the changes. And no warning letter when you unknowingly enter at times that used to be free. Just straight to a fine.



Cheers

Brad

And TFL have agreed to squander a huge sum on the daft DV "improvements", having just gone cap in hand to the government for yet another huge bail out.

Further, I read that TFL have 550 (!!) employees "earning" over ?100,000 pa. If correct, complete madness. West End restaurants and businesses are collapsing wholesale and this punitive congestion charge, particularly at weekends will turn central London into a ghost city.

Forget Rhodes.Khan must fall. Hopeless.

seenbeen Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> TfL was ?1 billion in deficit before the lockdown.

> He used ?600m for a fares freeze which did not

> benefit Londoners- only tourists



What i was thinking! The fit and mobile cd always walk, surely many peeps live within 30 mins walk of a restaurant? Maybe not- happy to stand corrected.


I am a shielded wheelchair user and had been told to avoid f2f b4 lockdown, social distancing etc. No longer took minicabs or uber to places had previously done so but walked if about an hr away. - well husband did as he accompanied my in chair. Helped keep him fit as well. It was very interesting we discovered streets we had no idea existed as we tried out different routes.

apbremer Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> And TFL have agreed to squander a huge sum on the

> daft DV "improvements", having just gone cap in

> hand to the government for yet another huge bail

> out.

> Further, I read that TFL have 550 (!!) employees

> "earning" over ?100,000 pa. If correct, complete

> madness. West End restaurants and businesses are

> collapsing wholesale and this punitive congestion

> charge, particularly at weekends will turn central

> London into a ghost city.

> Forget Rhodes.Khan must fall. Hopeless.


If all these employees/local authority /civil servants are working from home will they be losing their London Waiting top up to help the cause.


Surely that would help the TFL deficit

gabys1st Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> seenbeen Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > TfL was ?1 billion in deficit before the

> lockdown.

> > He used ?600m for a fares freeze which did not

> > benefit Londoners- only tourists

>

>

> What i was thinking! The fit and mobile cd always

> walk, surely many peeps live within 30 mins walk

> of a restaurant? Maybe not- happy to stand

> corrected.

>

> I am a shielded wheelchair user and had been told

> to avoid f2f b4 lockdown, social distancing etc.

> No longer took minicabs or uber to places had

> previously done so but walked if about an hr away.

> - well husband did as he accompanied my in chair.

> Helped keep him fit as well. It was very

> interesting we discovered streets we had no idea

> existed as we tried out different routes.


Also school children up to age 19 get free passes- they bus hop even if it's only 2 stops. Also it doesn't exactly encourage going to local schools or fitness either,

surely many peeps live within 30 mins walk of a restaurant? A restaurant, surely, but not necessarily one of the many in the West End. And an hours walk for a meal may be healthy, but if you're over 60 it ain't going to be much fun, particularly as the weather worsens into autumn and winter. With so many now working from home and thus not starting their evening in the City or West End coming in specially is going to be less attractive. This makes it even more so.

Its Killing the west end stores and restaurants and everyone who works in them is afraid for their jobs.

not a great idea when people have just started to reopen and try to claw back some of their lost takings.

No spenders in the west end after 7pm now just gangs of teenagers wandering about

The mayor pledged a fared freeze and this has been overturned by the government.


The government removed the funding it previously have to TFL. That means our transport system is funded solely by fares and other revenue (advertising, rent, property) and is the only self-funded transport system.


The mayor has been fighting the government to reintroduce the transport grant.


Despite this, TFL were on track to run a surplus AND deliver key projects.


It now looks like the mayor is screwing London but it's actually the government.

Spartacus Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> It was imposed by the government only in response

> to poor financial management by the mayor. Bit

> like any rescue deal , terms and conditions apply.


Yes exactly- and if the mayor wants some kind of autonomy he needs to sort it without the Government aid- i.e. the tax-payers' money. I'm sure the tax payers of Manchester, Liverpool etc would love to know they are subsidising London!

seenbeen Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Spartacus Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> I'm sure the tax payers of Manchester, Liverpool etc

> would love to know they are subsidising London!


You think that?s how it works!?


Liverpool etc propping up London!

Jules-and-Boo Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> That's not how it works. People travelling in

> London pay fares which partly fund TFL


TfL used to get government money

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-london-34923879

Jules-and-Boo Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------


>

> Despite this, TFL were on track to run a surplus

> AND deliver key projects.

>

> It now looks like the mayor is screwing London but

> it's actually the government.


How is a ?13 billion debt "on track to run a surplus" ? For context this article was the 12th May, only a month and a half into the reduction in passenger numbers so when the mayor got his bailout it was possibly higher.


BBC News - Coronavirus: Transport for London expects to lose ?4bn

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-london-52630386


It's obvious that the Mayor's policies in this area have failed but remember to TFL and the Mayor of London every bailout is important.

Spartacus Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------


> How is a ?13 billion debt "on track to run a

> surplus" ? For context this article was the 12th

> May, only a month and a half into the reduction in

> passenger numbers so when the mayor got his

> bailout it was possibly higher.

>

> BBC News - Coronavirus: Transport for London

> expects to lose ?4bn

> https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-london-52630

> 386

>

> It's obvious that the Mayor's policies in this

> area have failed but remember to TFL and the Mayor

> of London every bailout is important.


You think this Mayor?s created all that debt? Really?


I?d be keen to see your evidence that he inherited debt free balanced books, particularly once you take into account that eg the previous Mayor received government support that his successor doesn?t benefit from and Boris clearly had nothing like a coronavirus hit income to deal with

The government support has been reduced agreed, but it was approximately the same amount per year as the fares freeze cost, and as a result the Mayor put more funding into tfl. If he hadn't frozen fares then the phased reduction in government grant wouldn't have made a difference.


Prior to covid 19 hitting travel tfl were already in debt due to fares freeze, falling passenger numbers and other factors that the mayor should have addressed. I would like to see your evidence that the current mayor didn't get a balanced set of books. I'm not aware that he did or didn't but as you have raised the question can you provide evidence?

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • The decision to leave the EU was a poor one, but I'd avoid the term stupid when applied to the masses (the decision was of course stupid) and blame those who willingly misled.  A certain N Farage (pronounced with a hard G rather than the soft G he affected, rather continental eh?) being one of the main culprits. He blames the Tories for not delivering Brexit, and not really clear how Labour are playing this.  But ultimately what sort of Brexit were people voting for?  And ditto what future were people voting for last Thursday?
    • "That’s very insulting! You are basically calling 17 million people that voted to leave the EU ‘thick’. " I'm certainly calling them wrong. And many of those 17 million agree with me now and have expressed regret. Many others were indeed thick, and remain so. You can see them being interviewed all the time. As for insulting, the losing side in that referendum have being called every name under the sun "enemies of the people" etc etc - so spare me the tears about being insulted But for clarity. there is a certain type of individual who even now thinks Brexit was a good idea, tends to side with Trump and holds views about immigrants - and yes I am happy to calll those people thick. - and even worse Jazzer posts a long and sometimes correct post about the failings of modern parties. I myself think labour are woefully underperforming. But equally it has been less than a year after 14 years of mismanagement and despite some significant errors have largely steadied the ship. You only have to speak to other  countries to recognise the improvement there. They have cut NHS waiting times, and the upside of things like NI increases is higher minimum wage - something hard-bitten voters should appreciate. They were accused of being too gloomy when they came in and yet simultaneously people are accusing them of promising the earth and failing to deliver - both of those can't be true at the same time Fact is, this country repeatedly, over 15 years, voted for austerity and self-damaging policies like Brexit despite all warnings - this newish govt now have to pick up the pieces and there are no easy solutions. Voters say "we just want honest politicians" - ok, we have some bad news about the economy and the next few years  - "no no not that kind of honesty!!! - magic some solutions up now!" Anyone who considers voting for Reform because they don't represent existing parties and want "change" is being criminally negligent in ignoring their dog-whistles, their lack of diligence in vetting, their lack of attendance (in Westminster now and in eu parties is guises past) and basically making all of the same mistakes when they pushed for Brexit - basically, not serious people   "cost of things in the shops and utility bills keep on rising, the direct opposite of what they promised." - can we see that promise? I don't recall it? Because whatever voters or govts want, the cost of things is not exactly entirely in their gift. People were warned prices would rise with Brexit and e were told "we don't care - it's a price worth paying!". Turns out that isn' really true now is it - people DO care about the cost of things (and of course there are other factors - covid, trump, tariffs, wars etc.    What the country needs is a serious, mature electorate who take a high level view of priorities and get behind the hard work needed to achieve that. There is zero chance of that happening so we are doomed to repeat failures for years to come, complaining about everything and voting for policies which will make things worse here we have labour 2024 energy manifesto commitments - all of it necessary long term investment - calling for immediate price cuts with no money in the kitty seems unrealistic given all of the economic headwinds   https://www.energy-uk.org.uk/general-election-2024-all-manifesto-energy-pledges/#Labour_Party
    • Regardless of “Blighty” it’s the combination of “we” “R” and “Blighty” we means there is a them  cancerian may or may not recognise a dog whistle.  If he doesn’t, we are trying to point one out.  If he does then they are trying to gaslight us into pretending they are just a lovely fundraising group with no agenda 
    • I’m on Darrell Road and have noticed this recently - your daughters are not alone! It seems to only be at night. Would you agree? High pitched and consistent. I’ve been wondering if it’s a street lamp, or a fox deterrent system.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...