Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Inflation isn't supposed to be kept down, or there is no incentive to trade - it needs to be usually around 2% - 3%.


Whether Mervyn King is impacted by this will depend upon what index his pension is linked to. If his pension is linked to the retail price index the he won't be bothered by changes in inflation as his pension will always have the same purchasing power. Hence he wouldn't have an interest in either high or low inflation.

Its doesnt follow that the BoE has to keep inflation low - its a bit more complex than that, as is any discussion of the various machinations of how/ what kind of inflation is benchmarked - this is another discussion entirely I think though, given the political uses of any inflation rate produced and the publics understandable linear thinking of high vs Low inflation.


Blates the next question is whether the BoE slots into and is classified as part the normal civil service pension structure - and on this, I have no idea.


Given Merv is on a decent wedge and will invariably find himself a few nice directorships afterwards, maybe its not exactly going to kill him whether his monthly incomings are RPI or CPI linked

For some civil servants avg. lifetime earnings are indexed pre-retirement as part of the civil service pension. However, Dulwich Girl, the point people are trying to make is that linking a stream of cash flows to inflation at best protects you from the impact of inflation but you cannot gain anything in real terms. Mervin King therefore is not incentivised to generate high inflation. Unless you are suggesting he is trying to arbitrage CPI vs RPI or something...

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • The local councillor in question took home £50,172.71 in allowances and expenses in 23/24 on top of his full time salary as a teacher (which includes several weeks paid holiday). https://www.southwark.gov.uk/sites/default/files/2024-12/Member allowances 2023-24 - individual figures.pdf   I'm sure many hard working people at Sainsbury's would be delighted to make quite so much money.
    • Did anything actually crash into a pedestrian? Hope they are ok if so.
    • I don't care particularly for McAsh, the Greens or their drugs policy, but this "Greens will feed your children crack at school" stuff from the Daily Mail is just hysterical nonsense. Labour should be ashamed for seeding it - and the Mail doesn't know any better. Meanwhile, I can't remember the exact Tweet I saw recently but it was something like "some people who believe all politicians are out to enrich themselves only say that because they can't imagine serving their community for its own sake". The idea that serving as a local councillor (including dealing with the public, internal party politics - which is always the most vicious where the stakes are lowest, and plenty of unpaid prep work) is a great pathway for careerists and moneygrabbers is utter shite. On a per hour basis you'd be far better off working at Sainsbos.
    • That’s awful - I really hope no one is seriously injured. It might be worth updating the title so it clearly reflects what happened: a driver crashed into a pedestrian. The way we describe collisions matters, because it shapes how people understand responsibility and risk. If a cyclist hit someone, it would sound odd to say “bike hit pedestrian” without mentioning the rider - yet when cars are involved, the driver often disappears from the wording. Using accurate language isn’t about blaming anyone before the facts are known; it’s simply about recognising that vehicles don’t act on their own. Drivers have agency, and it would be helpful if the wording reflected that.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...