Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Beulah Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> It was a rape.

> And let's not blame the victim eh?

> She had every right to expect to walk home at

> whatever time of night without being attacked by

> total scum like this.

> If it's a "dodgy area" then we should make it safe

> - I don't want any no-go areas in my manor do

> you?



Who has blamed the victim?

As a daily user of Warwick Gardens this is very sobering. I hope they catch the bastard that did this.


As nice as the park is in the day, I cannot imagine walking through it at night. I'm not sure how you could make it completely 'safe' - perhaps lock it up at night.


Where my parents used to live a number of their neighbours got in the habit of leaving their curtains open in the evenings when sat in their living rooms. I like to think it sent a message to any strangers in the area that they could not pass unseen.

I cycle through Warwick Gdns every morning and it's a lovely park.


As Taper says, a lot of hard work has transformed it with new play equipment, the Green Flag award and (previously) the Winding event with live music and food.


I wouldn't advocate walking through ANY park alone at night and certainly WG would be included in this. Again, not sure what more could be done to make it safer aside from locking it up entirely.


My sympathies to the woman concerned and hopefully the police will find the culprit.

I suppose one of the problems with locking it at night is that it would inconvenience a lot of people who walk their dogs when they get home from work. I'd cycle though the park at night, but wouldn't walk through it. The time saved just doesn't seem worth the risk. As the above poster says, walking through any park on your own at night carries inherent risks.

Shutting the park at night would be very unpopular. Southwark tried to do so some years ago and there was a huge protest against.


Better lighting would help. The current lights are not as good as the ones we had (removed a year or so ago because they were rusting). I'm involved with the Friends of WG, for whom this has long been an issue. And in the light of the recent incident, we plan to pursue the issue of safety with Southwark and the local Police. Happy to feed in any views people might have.

taper Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Shutting the park at night would be very

> unpopular. Southwark tried to do so some years

> ago and there was a huge protest against.

>


xxxxxxx


Do you know why there was a protest?


It's common practice to shut parks at night, surely, for obvious reasons - to prevent the kind of incident which sadly has just happened.


When the park next to Sainsbury's on Dog Kennel Hill was not locked at night as it should have been (though I don't think this is a council-run park), there was an incident there as well. Can't remember exactly what, I think it was a mugging. After which they were a bit more conscientious about making sure it was locked.

Warwick Gardens is used a lot as a thoroughfare, so people heading to and from from work via Peckham Rye. Historically, a road (Azenby) ran through it to Lyndhurst Way. When the houses were demolished and a green space created, it was kept open. Not unusual in southwark: Burgess Park is similar although on a bigger scale.


I think the dog walkers were behind the protests about ten years ago. I certainly support keeping it open 24 hours. Southwark is lousy at keeping its parks open during hours when people want to use them. Closing WG would inconvenience a lot of people and force more pedestrians and cyclists onto Lyndhurst Grove which can be a bit of rat run. But more importantly, I think closing it would be a victory for the scumbags who commit crimes like this. Better use, better lighting and people being aware of the risks are the way forward, rather than closing it down for half the day.

taper Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Better use, better lighting and

> people being aware of the risks are the way

> forward, rather than closing it down for half the

> day.


xxxxxxxx


I see your points, although personally there's no way I would walk through an area like that at night, however well lit. Being "aware of the risks" isn't much help if one of the risks happens, is it?


And "closing it down for half the day" is a bit of an exaggeration, surely? Parks are normally open until dusk, which varies in time for month to month.


ETA: I find it slightly irritating - in the Winter particularly when it closes early - when I have to walk the long way round to DHFC (next to Sainsbury's on Dog Kennel Hill) rather than being able to cut through the park.


But I'd rather have to walk a bit further than risk being attacked :(


Obviously in an ideal world this wouldn't be an issue, but sadly in London it is. It doesn't stop me doing what I want - just makes me a bit more careful about how I do it.


ETA: In case of any doubt, I am in no way blaming the person who was attacked in Warwick Gardens, and I hope they catch the bastard who did it soon.


And there are several issues involved here - locking up parks at night is just one of them.

  • 3 weeks later...
My friend was mugged in WG a few years ago... And she was walking home with my other friend (male) so wasn't even alone. Ok - it was 4am, but... Local residents - pls be aware that the closed off, secluded nature of this park makes it easy pickings for those intent on harming others.

For all those who oppose safety improvements to Warwick Parks


I was saddened to hear of this recent attack. My two beautiful girlfriends and I were brutally attacked in this park in August last year around 9pm. One of us suffered a knife wound in the back. I find it hard to type this, but I cant? tell you how upsetting it is, that a year on; no improvements to the parks? safety has been made. The investigation went on for months and during this time there were many discussions over the parks' safety - closing at night, better lighting and security cameras.


Crime prevention, a responsible community and better security could have prevented this appalling crime.

It's a difficult one to address. Many attacks are often just a case of 'wrong place, wrong time' and we don't want to live our lives thinking 'what if'. Having said that though, the people that carry out these kinds of crimes are always going to look for locations that suit them, ie isolated and dark. Better lighting would definitely help (to deter both the criminal and to better allow those using the pask to assess danger) and given how small Warwick Gardens is, might be feasible.

> I heard they have caught the guy who raped this poor girl. Does anyone have any confirmation?


If anyone has been arrested, the case is sub judice, and any comment about a person concerned, if likely to be prejudicial to the trial process, might be deemed a punishable contempt of court. The proper thing is not to speculate in public, and to leave the decision about anyone's guilt to a jury.


And then there's the question of potential libel ... Another good reason for a little self control.

Just for confirmation - the process is as follows:-


An individual may be arrested - (this does not mean that they have been charged for any offence. An 'arrest' ensures that all interrogation is conducted under the rules of PACE and allows any subsequent statement to be used in evidence).

An Individual may be charged

An individual may be brought to trial

An individual may be found guilty - and only at this stage is that individual 'the guy who raped the girl'

  • 5 months later...

The rapist has now been sentenced.


http://crimeandjustice.co.uk/2013/04/24/rapist-jailed-peckham/


And those of you who use it will know new lights have now gone in and improved visibility on the path a lot. To my knowledge there have been no attacks in WG recently.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • So top of Lane. Local Sainsbury, middle Co Op and M and S and bottom Tesco Express…..now everyone should be happy except those that want a Waitrose as well…0h and  don’t forget M and S near ED Station….
    • Direct link to joint statement : https://thehaguegroup.org/meetings-bogota-en/?link_id=2&can_id=2d0a0048aad3d4915e3e761ac87ffe47&source=email-pi-briefing-no-26-the-bogota-breakthrough&email_referrer=email_2819587&email_subject=pi-briefing-no-26-the-bogot_-breakthrough&&   No. 26 | The Bogotá Breakthrough “The era of impunity is over.” That was the message from Bogotá, Colombia, where governments from across the Global South and beyond took the most ambitious coordinated action since Israel’s genocidal assault on Gaza began 21 months ago. Convened by The Hague Group and co-chaired by the governments of Colombia and South Africa, the Emergency Conference on Palestine brought together 30 states for two days of intensive deliberation — and emerged with a concrete, coordinated six-point plan to restrain Israel’s war machine and uphold international law. States took up the call from their host, Colombian President and Progressive International Council Member Gustavo Petro, who had urged them to be “protagonists together.” Twelve governments signed onto the measures immediately. The rest now have a deadline: 20 September 2025, on the eve of the United Nations General Assembly. The unprecedented six measures commit states to:     Prevent military and dual use exports to Israel.     Refuse Israeli weapons transfers at their ports.     Prevent vessels carrying weapons to Israel under their national flags.     Review all public contracts to prevent public institutions and funds from supporting Israel’s illegal occupation.     Pursue justice for international crimes.     Support universal jurisdiction to hold perpetrators accountable. “We came to Bogotá to make history — and we did,” said Colombian President Gustavo Petro. “Together, we have begun the work of ending the era of impunity. These measures show that we will no longer allow international law to be treated as optional, or Palestinian life as disposable.” The measures are not symbolic. They are grounded in binding obligations under international law — including the International Court of Justice’s July 2024 advisory opinion declaring Israel’s occupation unlawful, and September 2024’s UN General Assembly Resolution ES-10/24, which gave states a 12-month deadline to act. UN Special Rapporteur on the situation of human rights in the occupied Palestinian territory Francesca Albanese called them “a momentous step forward.” “The Hague Group was born to advance international law in an era of impunity,” said South Africa’s Foreign Minister, Ronald Lamola. “The measures adopted in Bogotá show that we are serious — and that coordinated state action is possible.” The response from Washington was swift — and revealing. In a threatening statement to journalists, a US State Department spokesperson accused The Hague Group of “seeking to isolate Israel” and warned that the US would “aggressively defend our interests, our military, and our allies, including Israel, from such coordinated legal and diplomatic” actions. But instead of deterring action, the threats have only clarified the stakes. In Bogotá, states did not flinch. They acted — and they invite the world to join them. The deadline for further states to take up the measures is now two months away. And with it, the pressure is mounting for governments across the world — from Brazil to Ireland, Chile to Spain — to match words with action. As Albanese said, “the clock is now ticking for states — from Europe to the Arab world and beyond — to join them.” This is not a moment to observe. It is a moment to act. Share the Joint Statement from Bogotá and popularise the six measures. Write to your elected representative and your government and demand they sign on before 20 September. History was made in Bogotá. Now, it’s up to all of us to ensure it becomes reality, that Palestinian life is not disposable and international law is not optional. The era of impunity is coming to an end. Palestine is not alone. In solidarity, The Progressive International Secretariat  
    • Most countries charge for entry to museums and galleries, often a different rate for locals (tax payers) and foreign nationals. The National Gallery could do this, also places like the Museums in South Kensington, the British Library and other tax-funded institutions. Many cities abroad add a tourist tax to hotel bills. It means tourists help pay for public services.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...