Jump to content

Recommended Posts

  • 3 weeks later...

Caught the final version in 4OD last night - not the same watching it on your computer. Thought it ended very interestingly with a sting in the tail; there were some holes but I'll leave it there.


And surely it should be left there, with the audience wondering and questioning. Please tell me that they are not serious about further series.

csaddleton Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Damages 4 is amazing and damages 5 is out in the

> US now - I cannot wait for this !!!



I have enjoyed all of Damages, but I still think the first 2 seasons were easily the strongest.


I've now done season 1 of Homeland, and thought it was pretty good. Half way through season 2, and after a promising start, I am starting to worry it's going to get shit.

  • 6 months later...
  • 2 months later...

Peter Quinn has instantly been promoted to favourite character.

Saul, who previously held it, has slipped a few positions, but I suspect he has a plan.


Carrie, understandably upset,though seemingly unable to spot the bleedin' obvious that she brought it on herself, is about as annoying as can be.


Although winner of most pointlessly annoying plotline of all time defeinitely goes to the tedium that is Brodie's family sans Brodie. I mean they were barely worth the effort before that though at least they had critical roles in the first series. But why oh why Mr Took, are they still here?!?!?!?

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Both notoriously “lovely” people to spend any time with or worse, serve 
    • No, just no.  Zero tolerance does not mean we expect zero crime but that we do not accept a standard level as normal and unavoidable. For those who have suffered such “minor” crimes, myself included having had my house broken into,  it is clear from the lack of action that they are considered “acceptable”’. Once small crimes become known to be ignored, it changes where and how we live.     
    • Lloyd Weber and Cilla Black were supposed to leave when Blair got in, but didn't
    • You can't have zero tolerance unless you live in a fascist/police state.  Sadly it is something you have to accept in a democracy.  There has always been crime, even in North Korea, the Soviet bloc, Nazi Germany, Cambodia under the Khmer Rouge etc.   The discussion point is how big a police force we need and capabilities, punishment, and building communities.  And how much we are prepared to pay in extra taxation. Even in the good (economic) times there is crime.  And crime under both Labour and Tory governments. I do not accept that phone thefts and parcel thefts are just statistics.  Police have to prioritise what they do, we might not agree with it.  And most criminals are multi-tasking, moving to where the best return is considering the risk of being caught. And there has to be a market, someone somewhere needs to buy a stolen product (I never buy off Gumtree). A starting point would be to decriminalise all illegal drugs, but that is definitely for a separate Lounge conversation, interesting discussion paper here: https://kar.kent.ac.uk/105520/1/A. Stevens - In defence of the decriminalisation of drug possession in the uk - PPDF.pdf Did you watch any of the series of Peaky Blinders?  This was a very popular series that glorified gang crime and violence.  Funny (ironic) that may enjoy films and TV that does this.  Although only the first series had any historical accuracy in it,  Criminal gangs were around before and ever since.    
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...