Jump to content

Peckham Rye Park Consultation - Redevelopment of Bowling Green


AylwardS

Recommended Posts

?The Green should be retained for croquet/bowls or other lawn games. The Pavilion could be hired for suitable uses.

There is not a need any more ?fun entertainment?. There will be very few quiet areas left.


The Park cannot sustain an increase of footfall which more ?fun entertainment? will bring. The Sexby Garden and the Japanese Garden have already been damaged by use as playgrounds.


The Friends of Peckham Rye Park website www.peckhamryepark.org has more comments.?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Other large sectionS of the park are given over for recreational use by children, parents and younger people: football, other sports, adventure playground, large children?s playground and you?d begrudge one tiny area being set aside for those, probably older, who want something more sedate?


Your provocative use of language indicates you are trolling again but just in case you are really serious then think again.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I suspect crazy golf is a preferred option because this an be outsourced to generate maximum income for the council for minimum outlay and effort.


Tennis courts, petanque courts, bowling greens etc don't generate much income and a third party operator isn't going to rent the space from the council in exchange for trying to turn a profit on them.


On that note the adventure playground should be offered to the company running "Go Ape" in Battersea Park.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Go Ape are very good at what they do and that might not be a bad idea.


Crazy golf could work but no-one is going to do that in the winter when it is cold and wet. So I think it could be a seasonal use and the equipment can be stored in winter. There are a wide range of lawn games that could be tried out at other times of the year. And there is also no reason why it couldn't be different things on different days either, attracting a variety of groups and clubs using the facility. So if a bowls team wanted to say use it on Tuesday afternoon, they could. Crazy golf could come out at the weekends etc.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

Unfortunately there are no longer any bowling clubs who will take on the use of the site. The Friends of Peckham Rye Park (I am a committee member) have tried to find alternative uses for it, and are still trying. But a bowling green is expensive to maintain ( the grass needs special care). The park is a Heritage site, so whatever happens there needs to be appropriate for the status of the park. And Southwark want revenue from unused resources ( they say that area of the park costs more than ?5000 a year to maintain).


But the consultation is to seek views for what would be acceptable so please get involved!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Lollipop Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Unfortunately there are no longer any bowling

> clubs who will take on the use of the site. The

> Friends of Peckham Rye Park (I am a committee

> member) have tried to find alternative uses for

> it, and are still trying. But a bowling green is

> expensive to maintain ( the grass needs special

> care). The park is a Heritage site, so whatever

> happens there needs to be appropriate for the

> status of the park. And Southwark want revenue

> from unused resources ( they say that area of the

> park costs more than ?5000 a year to maintain).

>

> But the consultation is to seek views for what

> would be acceptable so please get involved!


I'm glad you have highlighted this! In Southwark this costs around ?5,000 a year in rates alone!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Can someone please explain who "one Dulwich" are?
    • We are actually referred to as "Supporters"...2,100 of us across Dulwich...read and weep! 😉   https://www.onedulwich.uk/supporters   Got it, the one where 64% of respondents in the consultation area said they wanted the measures "returned to their original state". Is that the one you claim had a yes/no response question?   Well I suggest you read up on it as it is an important part of the story of utter mismangement by the councils and this is why so many of us can't work out who is pulling the council's strings on this one because surely you can agree that if the emergency services were knocking on your door for months and months telling you the blocks in the roads were delayihg response times and putting lives at risk you'd do something about it? Pretty negligent not to do so don't you think - if I was a councillor it would not sit well with me?   Careful it could be a Mrs, Miss or Mx One.....   Of course you don't that's because you have strong opinions but hate being asked for detail to.back-up those opinions (especially when it doesn't serve their narrative) and exposes the flaws in your arguments! 😉  As so many of the pro-LTN lobby find to their cost the devil is always in the detail.....
    • Really?  I'm sorry to hear that. What did you order? 
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...